• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cricket

Ferret

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2009
Messages
4,131
It just needs one good ball from England...

----

It wouldn't be right if the Test didn't end in controversy. But it has and England have won thanks to Erasmus deciding that there was an edge behind but personally, whilst I'm not complaining, I'm not convinced there was enough there to overrule the on-field umpire.

Nonsense I'm afraid. I was convinced when I watched it live, and the audible noise as the ball passed the bat could not have been anything else other than leather on willow - the bat was miles from the body, pads or anything else. Correct decision made for once! Oh, and although it's after the event, snicko subsequently provemd Haddin hit it.

Wonderful Test match despite the Agar/Trott/Broad controversies. Who knows, if it wasn't for the shocking Agar decision, this Test would not have been so close. And, one suspects Australia may have won were it not for Aleem Dar's howler with Broad. Roll on Thirsday...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

flymo

Established Member
Joined
22 May 2007
Messages
1,552
Location
Geordie back from exile.
Well if all 5 tests are as dramatic as that one then I'm going to need another set of fingernails to nibble on. It seems somewhat fitting that the last man out was an overturned umpire call, it just seems rather fitting with the experiences of the previous 4 days.

The use of the review system it seems is critical to the outcome of the game, both reviews need to be used wisely.

Ah well, onwards to Lords on Thursday, should be a belter.
 
Last edited:

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,067
Location
Redcar
Nonsense I'm afraid. I was convinced when I watched it live, and the audible noise as the ball passed the bat could not have been anything else other than leather on willow - the bat was miles from the body, pads or anything else. Correct decision made for once! Oh, and although it's after the event, snicko subsequently provemd Haddin hit it.

Having watched it again I agree, especially once we got Snicko's view.
 

Ferret

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2009
Messages
4,131
Having watched it again I agree, especially once we got Snicko's view.

I'm amazed they haven't sought to speed up the snicko so that the 3rd umpire can use that too.

The Beeb pointed out that Haddin looked guilty, as though he'd nicked it. He looked gutted!
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,386
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Looks as if this heatwave is here for some time, so how the next venues' square reacts will be interesting. If the hot dry weather keeps up like this, it will be like playing at the WACA...:cry:



--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
******************************************************************************************

Some amazing bowling figues by the vintage all-rounder, Shahid Afridi, for Pakistan against the West Indies in a 50 over ODI match.

9 overs -3 maidens - 12 runs - 7 wickets :shock:
 
Last edited:

Arglwydd Golau

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2011
Messages
1,448
I'm amazed they haven't sought to speed up the snicko so that the 3rd umpire can use that too.

The Beeb pointed out that Haddin looked guilty, as though he'd nicked it. He looked gutted!

Just a further point on this - Haddin now says that he knew he nicked it, waiting for umpire's decision, as he had a right to (just like Broad). There has been far too much talk in the media and much grumbling from older players about 'walking', but I remember similar in the 1960's when I was a young lad....I don't really think that there was such a golden age of honesty, but of course nowadays with endless close-ups if you look guilty you will be found out!
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,386
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Wonderful Test match despite the Agar/Trott/Broad controversies. Who knows, if it wasn't for the shocking Agar decision, this Test would not have been so close. And, one suspects Australia may have won were it not for Aleem Dar's howler with Broad. Roll on Thirsday...

In the cricketing equivalent of "locking the stable door once the horse has bolted", the ICC have made a statement to the effect that Marais Erasmus had incorrectly given Jonathon Trott out lbw using DRS, in the first Test Match.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
*********************************************************************************************

The square must be much to the liking of the batsmen at Old Trafford in this heatwave, as Glamorgan had amassed 474 before their final wicket fell, to which Lancashire have responded with a score of 567 all out by lunch on day four of the match.

It does not always rain at Old Trafford during matches..:D
 
Last edited:

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
Terrible start in the second test with both Cook, Pietersen and Root out with only 28 on the board.

Yet again our top batsmen fail to deliver.
 
Last edited:

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,067
Location
Redcar
I see that Finn was replaced by Bresnan for the second Test Match. Experience preferred to age ?

Should have gone for Onions, he likes bowling at Lords.

80-3 at Lunch, not brilliant but still a while to go before I reach the hair pulling stage.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
289-7 at the close of play, Australia have the edge with today being such a perfect pitch for batting we shouldn't have shed wickets like we have.
 

furryfeet

Member
Joined
17 Apr 2008
Messages
449
I'm amazed they haven't sought to speed up the snicko so that the 3rd umpire can use that too.

The Beeb pointed out that Haddin looked guilty, as though he'd nicked it. He looked gutted!

there are moves afoot to get the snicko available within 5 seconds, but no definitive timescale has yet been put ....
 

Arglwydd Golau

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2011
Messages
1,448
We shouldn't have lost so many wickets to the very very part-time spin of Steve Smith, quite embarrassing!

Just one of those things, I suppose (tho' the ball that got Bell was a good one), odd that in Australia last time his bowling seemed to have been treated by the English batsmen as a bit of a joke.
England need to get up to at least 350, I would suggest, but if Ryan Harris puts on his snarly face and with the new ball they might be lucky to reach 300.
Test cricket!
 

Searle

Established Member
Joined
4 May 2012
Messages
1,580
Location
Ladbroke Grove
We shouldn't have lost so many wickets to the very very part-time spin of Steve Smith, quite embarrassing!

He seemed to be getting a lot of revs on the ball though! I like Steve Smith, mainly for his outstanding fielding. The C&B was quite impressive :D

Hoping for another stand from the tailenders tomorrow morning though. Not sure how hopeful I am though with the new ball about to come in.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
At the start of the game they said on Sky that it was at least a 450 run pitch, I think we''ll be lucky to get within 100 of that.
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
6,149
Location
Lancashire
Lets hope "The Burnley Express" (Jimmy Anderson) can make an impressive start with the New Ball. I expect Broad will be his opening partner?
 

Arglwydd Golau

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2011
Messages
1,448
At the start of the game they said on Sky that it was at least a 450 run pitch, I think we''ll be lucky to get within 100 of that.

Well, they reached 361 due to a typical Broad/Swann partnership! Much better than I expected after the first ball of the day....the key now has to be the first few overs with the new ball.
At 27/3, England would have settled for 361.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
Well, they reached 361 due to a typical Broad/Swann partnership! Much better than I expected after the first ball of the day....the key now has to be the first few overs with the new ball.
At 27/3, England would have settled for 361.

I think we'll know if 361 is a reasonable score by Saturday.
 

Cab2Cab

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2013
Messages
180
I see Erasmoose got another umpiring decision wrong again........but i'm not complaining this time :D...............and trott has just dropped a catch.:oops:
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,067
Location
Redcar
Good stuff so far and a bit better than I'd had in mind at the close last night (I was thinking England all out 330ish and Australia all out 250ish). Still we've got to get through Agar yet, I'd rather he didn't come out of perform more heroics!
 

Top