Would the first indication for the driver that something's wrong be something like a power supply loss alarm on the TMS?
Would the first indication for the driver that something's wrong be something like a power supply loss alarm on the TMS?
350376 according to the updates - assuming they are correct!
- I am led to believe the unit number on disgraced 350 is 350370
I'm surprised how far ahead of the pantograph the sparks seemed to be, also that the unit seemed to coast to a stand rather than stopping quickly.Apart from the shower of sparks, the VCB lamp will illuminate and an ADD alert will come up on the TMS screen on a red background. The Line light will also go out.
Why "disgraced"? Could be - indeed, more likely to be - NR's overhead or an object in/on the overhead.
- I am led to believe the unit number on disgraced 350 is 350370
Why "disgraced"? Could be - indeed, more likely to be - NR's overhead or an object in/on the overhead.
Why "disgraced"? Could be - indeed, more likely to be - NR's overhead or an object in/on the overhead.
Any update on this? It was sorted quite quickly, as there seemed to be no delays after the middle of the morning after.Seems to be flagged as an "I" code .....Infrastructure fault. This could change of course.
I'm surprised how far ahead of the pantograph the sparks seemed to be, also that the unit seemed to coast to a stand rather than stopping quickly.
Not quite sorted - electric trains still don't have access to Platform 11 from the north end.Any update on this? It was sorted quite quickly, as there seemed to be no delays after the middle of the morning after.
The sparks may not have come from the pantograph. It may have been a cable hanging which struck the front of the train then got tangled in the pantograph. Or it may have just been a camera illusion.
Train involved was 1F53 1736 Birmingham New Street - Liverpool Lime Street, and it was caught on camera (by railcam.uk)
Not quite sorted - electric trains still don't have access to Platform 11 from the north end.