• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Could the Railways Work Like Airlines?

Status
Not open for further replies.

whhistle

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
Not on the whole but I wonder if A to B (no stopping elsewhere) could work for places like Edinburgh to London.
Forgetting pathing (as they would be additional services, not replacements) and suitable stock for a moment; it would probably be advance booking only.
Sounds a bit like Richard Branson but if you can fill a train at Edinburgh for London, why bother to stop elsewhere?

Or are people transfixed on flying those distances?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,237
Location
Yorkshire
... if you can fill a train at Edinburgh for London...
You could fill a short train, yes.

So in theory, given unlimited platform availability at Waverley and King's Cross and unlimited pathing availability at all intermediate points, your idea could happen.

But, as we don't have those things, it isn't a sensible thing to do.

As it is, arguably the railway already acts as an airline where practicable/sensible, e.g. Yorkshire to London non-stop with prices that require all leisure passengers to book in advance.
Or are people transfixed on flying those distances?
Plenty of people do travel by train between Edinburgh and London.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,613
Location
Nottingham
Planes used on domestic flights have no more than 200 seats whereas intercity trains have 500 or more. Larger planes are available but have longer loading times and the number of passengers is better matched to a small plane flying more often.

For a plane to make an intermediate stop costs an hour or more when taxiiing and un/loading of people and baggage is taken into account. Stopping a train intermediately costs a few minutes.

If a plane lands, it doesn't impede other planes continuing their journeys. A train making a stop will impede other non-stopping trains, unless the station in question has through tracks for overtaking.

For all these reasons trains tend to be large and make several stops on their journeys, planes are smaller and overwhelmingly point-to-point.
 

sprunt

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
1,631
Isn't there a prospective open access company planning to do exactly this? I'm sure I've seen it discussed on here.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Isn't there a prospective open access company planning to do exactly this? I'm sure I've seen it discussed on here.

The FirstGroup proposal isn't non stop.

In reality it's more of "why don't planes stop", and the answer is because it takes so much time to do so. There are actually a small number of them that do, though.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
The FirstGroup proposal isn't non stop.

In reality it's more of "why don't planes stop", and the answer is because it takes so much time to do so. There are actually a small number of them that do, though.

"Gate 9 for the oh-nine thirty Britsh Airways service to Edinburgh Turnhouse. Calling at Birmingham Elmdon, Manchester Ringway, Leeds Bradford Yeadon, Newcastle and Edinburgh Turnhouse. Due to arrive Edinburgh at seventeen forty-five."
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,676
The time penalty for calling at some stations is relatively small, eg at York, Newcastle, Preston and Carlisle a non stop train saves only 3 minutes compared to one that calls because the linespeed is so low. For the sake of (say) 3 minutes on a 4hr+ journey, it offers the potential of picking up much more revenue. There’s also the matter of driving time and crew hours.
 

tasky

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2018
Messages
384
Isn't this to an extent what some HS2 services are going to do? High-demand city pairs
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,613
Location
Nottingham
Isn't this to an extent what some HS2 services are going to do? High-demand city pairs
Yes to quite a large extent. Obviously only possible for the largest city pairs that can sustain several trains per hour each with 500 or more seats so basically London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds. Other trains serve multiple smaller cities.
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
7,552
Location
Torbay
Isn't this to an extent what some HS2 services are going to do? High-demand city pairs

To an extent yes as others have said, but remember also that all HS2 services are planned to stop at Old Oak Common, about 5 miles from Euston. That'll be like a BA jet leaving terminal 5, then taxiiing down to the east end of the runway and calling at another gate situated in the maintenance complex near Hatton Cross before taking off!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
To an extent yes as others have said, but remember also that all HS2 services are planned to stop at Old Oak Common, about 5 miles from Euston. That'll be like a BA jet leaving terminal 5, then taxiiing down to the east end of the runway and calling at another gate situated in the maintenance complex near Hatton Cross before taking off!

Those who have ever taken off from or landed on the Polderbaan "at" Schiphol (pretty much in Hoofddorp) may well consider this a good idea!
 

Highlandspring

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2017
Messages
2,777
I once flew from Aberdeen to Stansted on an AirUK (remember them?) BAe 146 with an intermediate passenger stop at Newcastle.
 

EssexGonzo

Member
Joined
9 May 2012
Messages
637
And we can't ignore pricing. Maybe its a perception, but I always seem to think that if I book a little in advance and avoid peak times, Easyjet will always beat LNER/VTWC to Scotland price-wise.

Nor can we ignore perceived prestige / status that some business people attach to flying. Many get on a train to go to work every day. So when they fly somewhere they feel "special" and like to tell their colleagues/mates/family/anyone who will listen that they're doing so. It's a strange observation given that short haul flying is a pain in the butt but I've worked among many of these people.
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,900
I once flew from Aberdeen to Stansted on an AirUK (remember them?) BAe 146 with an intermediate passenger stop at Newcastle.
Flew from Canada to Heathrow years ago but found out the plane was stopping at Prestwick en route. Managed to change things to get off there. Bet you couldn't do that these days with increased security etc.!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Flew from Canada to Heathrow years ago but found out the plane was stopping at Prestwick en route. Managed to change things to get off there. Bet you couldn't do that these days with increased security etc.!

If it was a revenue stop I don't see why not, but I imagine it'd cost you.

Not a lot to stop you if you only had hand luggage anyway.
 

TRAX

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2015
Messages
1,811
Location
France
If it was a revenue stop I don't see why not

Because of the threat that a terrorist could plant a bomb on a plane in his hold luggage, then leave the plane with the luggage still on board when it takes off again. This modus operandi has happened before.
 

d9009alycidon

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2011
Messages
981
Location
Eaglesham
I am travelling from Glasgow to Croydon next week and it actually worked out cheaper than air for once, one expense that swung it was the £55 charge for parking for three days at Glasgow Airport, being over 60 I can travel from home to Glasgow Central in the bus for nothing!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Because of the threat that a terrorist could plant a bomb on a plane in his hold luggage, then leave the plane with the luggage still on board when it takes off again. This modus operandi has happened before.

The "it'll cost you" implied that you asked permission to do so and paid any change in fare. So your luggage would be unloaded in the correct place.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I am travelling from Glasgow to Croydon next week and it actually worked out cheaper than air for once, one expense that swung it was the £55 charge for parking for three days at Glasgow Airport, being over 60 I can travel from home to Glasgow Central in the bus for nothing!

Can't you also go on the bus to Glasgow Airport for nothing?
 

d9009alycidon

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2011
Messages
981
Location
Eaglesham
Can't you also go on the bus to Glasgow Airport for nothing?

I would need to get into the city centre then take the service bus to the airport, the concession card is not valid on the express. Besides, I want to take the train! I haven't done the full length of the WCML since the 1980s and it is a first class ticket so complementary munchies, coffee and drinks - you have to pay for that on BA now!
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,676
Nor can we ignore perceived prestige / status that some business people attach to flying. Many get on a train to go to work every day. So when they fly somewhere they feel "special" and like to tell their colleagues/mates/family/anyone who will listen that they're doing so. It's a strange observation given that short haul flying is a pain in the butt but I've worked among many of these people.

I think the prestige of flying, especially domestically, is much diminished compared to even 10 years ago. Partly because it is so easy to do now, and so cheap.

Indeed I would argue that for longer distance trips, eg London - Scotland, there is a prestige on catching the train. It is unquestionably a more comfortable environment, and usually more expensive. But saying “oh I got the train” will show that you are prepared to pay more for that comfort, compared to being wedged into a A319.
 

B&I

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2017
Messages
2,484
Funny how railways operating point to point like airlines is a ludicrous idea on the conventional network, but when something similar is proposed via HS2 it becomes An Unquestionnably Good Thing
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
7,552
Location
Torbay
Funny how railways operating point to point like airlines is a ludicrous idea on the conventional network, but when something similar is proposed via HS2 it becomes An Unquestionnably Good Thing
I don't really understand your point given that 1. all HS2 trains are all intended to stop at OOC and 2. A fair number of services will call at Birmingham Interchange, East Midlands Hub or Crewe en-route to other destinations. The core trunk network is designed for such a pattern, to get the best out of the train performance at maximum capacity with a simple twin track layout.
 

Indigo Soup

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2018
Messages
1,485
Because of the threat that a terrorist could plant a bomb on a plane in his hold luggage, then leave the plane with the luggage still on board when it takes off again. This modus operandi has happened before.
I've never quite understood how this is supposed to work - one would have thought that the bomb would have been intercepted by the security checks at the airport. Especially in the current environment where continued survival of the terrorist is optional!

There are, I believe, flights from London City to New York that stop for fuel at Shannon, but return non-stop. With enough fuel on to cross the Atlantic, they end up in the Thames or Canary Wharf.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,613
Location
Nottingham
Also the hold luggage checked in by someone leaving the flight at an intermediate stop would also be removed at that stop. So that would only work if they managed to leave the flight before their intended destination, without this being noticed.

There have been cases of someone planting a bomb in the cabin then leaving the flight at an intermediate stop, for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_Airlines_Flight_434
The bombing was a part of the unsuccessful Bojinka terrorist attacks. The Boeing 747 (tail number EI-BWF) was flying the second leg of a route from Ninoy Aquino International Airport (formerly Manila International Airport), Pasay City in the Philippines, to Narita International Airport, in Tokyo, Japan, with a stop at Mactan–Cebu International Airport, Cebu, in the Philippines. After the bomb detonated, 57-year-old veteran pilot Captain Eduardo "Ed" Reyes was able to land the aircraft, saving it and the remaining passengers and crew.[1]

Authorities later discovered that Ramzi Yousef, a passenger on the aircraft's prior flight leg, had placed the explosive.
Aircraft bombings have become rare in recent years. I think this is down to better security, as there are still plenty of people out there who would want to bomb an aircaft.
 

big all

On Moderation
Joined
23 Sep 2018
Messages
876
Location
redhill
I think the prestige of flying, especially domestically, is much diminished compared to even 10 years ago. Partly because it is so easy to do now, and so cheap.

Indeed I would argue that for longer distance trips, eg London - Scotland, there is a prestige on catching the train. It is unquestionably a more comfortable environment, and usually more expensive. But saying “oh I got the train” will show that you are prepared to pay more for that comfort, compared to being wedged into a A319.
prestige dosnt exist unless what other people think bothers you :D
do what you want to and iff your fair honest and considerate to others what they think is there problem
i have never lived my life for other people and never will;)
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,613
Location
Nottingham
Perhaps a slightly different way of putting it might be that many people used to look forward to a flight as a rare experience that would be fairly comfortable and where they would be pampered with "free" drinks and meal etc (included in the price but if on business the employer was paying anyway). That's still partly true for long haul but the advent of low-cost airlines (and the attempts by the established airlines to compete) means short-haul flying is now much less rare, but many people see it as a humiliation to be endured rather than any sort of luxury.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top