Western 52
Established Member
Yes I think you can lock a train into Llandrindod siding. They do that with the Royal Welsh Show train each July.
I expect the only thing keeping it going is the political cost of closing it! That is why I wonder how big an infrastructure failure would need to be to just give up on it.Closing it would be costly. The Welsh Govt would need to find a way to blame central Govt, and vice-versa, and just ignore those ruralcommunconstituencies.
Is there that much tourist potential? Both ends are a bit remote, trains are tiny and low quality, scenery is good but not spectacular.More passengers:
- low catchment area population
- high tourism potential
I can't see how you make it cheaper. Stock is as cheap as it gets, staffing is minimal (single bod operation would mean driver collecting fares which would make it far slower, and its pretty remote to only have one staff member on board)Less cost:
Chicken and egg..Is there that much tourist potential? Both ends are a bit remote, trains are tiny and low quality, scenery is good but not spectacular.
Exactly...I can't see how you make it cheaper. Stock is as cheap as it gets, staffing is minimal (single bod operation would mean driver collecting fares which would make it far slower, and its pretty remote to only have one staff member on board)
Well, you wouldn't build or run a railway at all.What would you do if starting from nothing. What railway would you run?
Would be interesting if there was a referendum of the good folk of Shropshire, Powys and Carmarthenshire to see if they would rather keep the line open north of say Ammanford or turn the route into a tourist-oriented cycleway and spend the £Xm per year subsidy on a heavily discounted quality half hourly bus service instead (and still have plenty of change).Well, you wouldn't build or run a railway at all.
As noted earlier in the thread it's only there at all because transporting coal was once a lucrative business and it's only still there because the politicians are too frightened to close it.
There are a number of small towns along the line, including Knighton, Llandrindod Wells, Llanwrtyd Wells, Llandovery and Llandeilo, which are nice interesting places to visit. With the perhaps the exception of Llandrindod none of them are really large enough to need more than a couple of hours to explore them. Therefore it would be good if the timetable allowed visitors to visit more than one of these locations during a days visit. The huge gap without a train in the afternoon does not really work for anyone wanting to visit these towns.In planning my second attempt (in a clockwise direction) it soon became clear that the timetable did not allow me to stop off at two places where I could stay for a couple of hours/pints before continuing - Llandrindod and Knighton perhaps? So in the end, I travelled straight through from Swansea to Church Stretton where I stopped for a beer break, then down to Ludlow for a longer break.
In my view, the potential of the line for leisure travel would be much enhanced if there was a 2-hourly service frequency, journey times were reduced to the 1981 timings mentioned up-thread, and if the wretched lineside vegetation could be cut back (at least on the scenic sections of the line) to allow the views to actually be enjoyed.
However, from the discussion above, it seems that sadly, these things are exceedingly unlikely to happen.
I suspect the turnout would reflect the numbers using cycleways or public transport and be very low.Would be interesting if there was a referendum of the good folk of Shropshire, Powys and Carmarthenshire to see if they would rather keep the line open north of say Ammanford or turn the route into a tourist-oriented cycleway and spend the £Xm per year subsidy on a heavily discounted quality half hourly bus service instead (and still have plenty of change).
I suspect the turnout would reflect the numbers using cycleways or public transport and be very low.
The roads are terrible. Mind you, if they closed the railway, they could use the track bed for a Builth Wells by-pass for the A483 (but not the A470).Would be interesting if there was a referendum of the good folk of Shropshire, Powys and Carmarthenshire to see if they would rather keep the line open north of say Ammanford or turn the route into a tourist-oriented cycleway and spend the £Xm per year subsidy on a heavily discounted quality half hourly bus service instead (and still have plenty of change).
Llandeilo has Newton House (NT) and Dinefwr Castle within walking distance fo the station. It would be good if a local ran a mini bus up to Carreg Cennen Castle which is about 4 miles SE of the town. Llandeilo is spoilt by having the A483 going through the main street - as is Builth Wells. Goodness knows why the Welsh Government have been against these places having by-passes?There are a number of small towns along the line, including Knighton, Llandrindod Wells, Llanwrtyd Wells, Llandovery and Llandeilo, which are nice interesting places to visit. With the perhaps the exception of Llandrindod none of them are really large enough to need more than a couple of hours to explore them. Therefore it would be good if the timetable allowed visitors to visit more than one of these locations during a days visit. The huge gap without a train in the afternoon does not really work for anyone wanting to visit these towns.
A few years ago I did a day trip along most of the line starting from Crewe and decided to make my destination Llandeilo. At that time the timetable allowed me just over 2 hours in Llandeilo which was good. Even then the afternoon gap in the timetable did not make it practical to stop off at one of the other towns on the return journey. Instead I stopped off at Church Stretton which has a more frequent timetable to complete my return journey. The current timetable is even less convenient for day visits than the one a few years ago with an even longer afternoon gap in the timetable.
I was thinking more about earthworks, considering how many have been failing across the country in recent years. I believe the line goes through some quite bumpy land so I assume it has some pretty significant cuttings and embankments.Over the years , money has been spent on viaducts and tunnels - so they can probably go on for ever. I don't think a 15x does much track damage and the tonnage passing over the route is low , so track renewals are containable.
I recall being told that the line enjoyed dedicated and local PW staff who knew it intimately , so simple jobs like sleeper changing on a need to basis was done. Keeping costs down such that unit costs were low. Almost a paragon of cost effective route management.
At the end of the day it would be lovely to have a 2 hourly service on the HOWL. However with the population of much of the line and therefore usage being very low its hard to imagine any investment in this would be possible. As well as an addition passing loop there were be more costs such as train crew and more trains . I think it does have to be a compromise.
Id guess the majority of people who use the line are locals either going to Shrewsbury or Llanelli/Swansea or Llandod as their nearest town or city. But there is still a massive potential for people who dont use the line to use it for tourism. Also some people do use it end to end for leisure purposes and not just enthusiasts.
Whilst at Swansea this afternoon i noticed a 150 sat at platform 1 which I assume had formed an earlier HOWL service. Also another HOWL service was arriving into platform 4. Im not sure what the arrangements are for moving these units, I guessing 1 of them forms the evening HOWL service but what about the other one. Everything else on paper is booked for a 197 now (apart from the daily MK4 service). There does seem to be a lot of units sat around in Swansea doing nothing quite a few hours. Its a real shame some short joruneys even as far as Ammanford couldnt happen. It would boost use of the southern end of the line for sure.
Define ’massive’, and why do you think this?But there is still a massive potential for people who dont use the line to use it for tourism
I see your point. I just think the likes of Llandovery, Llanwrtyd and Llandod could see bigger numbers of people visiting as tourists with a more frequent service. Perhaps massive was the wrong word to use.Define ’massive’, and why do you think this?
It’s not really on the tourist trail, neither end is touristy, and doesn’t really have ‘brand awareness’. Apart from rail enthusiasts have you heard anyone talking about the area as a ‘must visit’? It’s very pleasant but is it ‘wow, looks spectacular - we must base a holiday around it!’.
Is there any evidence rail tour operators think there is a big market - that would be an indicator.
And do TfW really want a tourist market for the line - the trains are tiny so they would risk overloads in the summer which the year round market can’t sustain more stock for.
Llanwrtyd also has the A483 through the middle, while Llandovery has the A40 going down the main street despite its being too narrow for two cars to pass outside the Castle Hotel.Llandeilo is spoilt by having the A483 going through the main street - as is Builth Wells. Goodness knows why the Welsh Government have been against these places having by-passes?
I do wonder whether those suggesting towns like this as tourist centres have actually visited them and actually spent any time in them!I see your point. I just think the likes of Llandovery, Llanwrtyd and Llandod could see bigger numbers of people visiting as tourists with a more frequent service. Perhaps massive was the wrong word to use.
Whilst none of them are hugely exciting places I do very much enjoy my (not very frequent due to the poor service) trips on the HOWL to visit these places.
I would agree that some of the roads do cause problems at some times, especially in Llandeilo. A bypass has been looked at but the route was deemed to possibly cause a flooding problem on a known flood risk river. From experience a lot of people now just head on down the A40 to Carmarthen and join the A48 to head to Swansea.Llanwrtyd also has the A483 through the middle, while Llandovery has the A40 going down the main street despite its being too narrow for two cars to pass outside the Castle Hotel.
They're all pleasant little towns and do get some tourist trade, but very little of that comes by train. Whether a better service would encourage sufficiently more to justify the extra cost is moot, but presumably the evidence of the fifth daily train for the last two years is that it didn't.
Yes all pleasant towns to visit but not overly special. Most tourists would probably enjoy being on the line iteself rather than want to visit any of the places. I know myself the incentive for going on the HOWL line is more to ride the trains and experience the line rather than want to visit any place in particular. I would guess the poor service is why most tourists to these places go by car/ bus rather than train.Llanwrtyd also has the A483 through the middle, while Llandovery has the A40 going down the main street despite its being too narrow for two cars to pass outside the Castle Hotel.
They're all pleasant little towns and do get some tourist trade, but very little of that comes by train. Whether a better service would encourage sufficiently more to justify the extra cost is moot, but presumably the evidence of the fifth daily train for the last two years is that it didn't.
I have visited Llandovery and Llandod once each and Llanwrtyd a few times but never been to Llandeilo surprisingly. Of the smaller stops ive only been to Garth but want to do Cynghordy and Sugar Loaf at some point.I do wonder whether those suggesting towns like this as tourist centres have actually visited them and actually spent any time in them!
Llandeilo: Too far from the station. I actually like Llandeilo but I go by car, but car parking can be problematical.
Llandovery: Lots of pubs and a few good cafes. A few craft type shops. A ruined castle with a stainless steel statue in front of it. A bowls and croquet club. A private school. Motorbikes on a weekend. Good car parking.
Llanwrtyd Wells: Quite a walk from the station. A couple of fairly basic pubs and cafes. A craft type shop. Some mad events at various times of the year. Poor parking.
Llandrindod: Probably the best of the towns with some good pubs and cafes. Some decent shops. The Rock Park. The Springs. Quite a decent town museum. Good parking.
2210 FSX/2222 FO Cardiff - Crewe & 2220 Crewe - Cardiff are booked 2 x 153. There are ECS movements Shrewsbury - Crewe late at night and return early in the morning, plus the aforementioned Crewe - Shrewsbury locals, that keep the sets rotated for now. The Cardiff services may well end in future; I don't believe there are plans for Cardiff drivers to maintain 153 competency in the long term.I have a question about how sets are now moved to Swansea/Carmarthen for the HOWL services. In the past there were booked workings for Sprinters from Cardiff to Swansea/West Wales as not just HOWL but other services in the West were booked for Sprinters. Now is it simply a few ECS movements from Canton to get them to where they need to be. In the North to get them to Crewe they interwork with the Crewe stopper so not such a problem to swap sets over. I dont know whether its still the case with the new timetable but there used to be a booked working on Fridays evenings in the last timetable from Cardiff-Crewe to get a set to Crewe.
Thanks for your reply. Yes I imagine maintenance will be done at just Crewe once they stop being used on local journeys around Cardiff.2210 FSX/2222 FO Cardiff - Crewe & 2220 Crewe - Cardiff are booked 2 x 153. There are ECS movements Shrewsbury - Crewe late at night and return early in the morning, plus the aforementioned Crewe - Shrewsbury locals, that keep the sets rotated for now. The Cardiff services may well end in future; I don't believe there are plans for Cardiff drivers to maintain 153 competency in the long term.
As growing the Central Wales passenger traffic hasn't been achieved by any of the fine array of highly skilled railway folk and privateers who have stewarded it from John Davies in BR days onwards, you have to suspect it just isn't possible.
JD even experimented with at least one summer of the SO Manchester to Tenby running via the Central Wales line circa 1989, albeit with a pair of 150s.
Probably the 230s or 765s. In the short term they can draw more power from the batteries than the diesel engines can produce.Not going to happen, but given the huge number of stops on this route, would the provision of trains with better acceleration than a class 153 facilitate reduced journey times and/or an improved timetable?
Which trains in the TfW fleet actually have the best 0-60 time?
This is the type of point I was going to raise, the power of the right promotion is incredibly strong. It seems unlikely that this route will ever make much from commuting or shopping trips, but the leisure market could have a lot of potential. I do wonder whether there isn't scope to improve the promotion of this route. A story associating some of the stations or other easily accessible locations along the route with famous people would almost guarantee hordes of visitors. Maybe someone from the cast of Gavin and Stacey could pay a visit, or perhaps one of them might even have a relative associated with somewhere along the route? The famous man of the moment is Luke Littler - not an obvious connection but who knows? And just imagine if someone with the fame of Taylor Swift had a connection? All clutching at straws of course, but I do wonder if any stone has been left unturned?If only the producers of the Harry Potter films had chosen to use the Central Wales line instead of the West Highland, it could have been a different story tourism-wise! Very photogenic viaduct at Knucklas (also Cynghordy). There would probably be a daily summer steam service from Shrewsbury to Llandod!