So while I was wandering around London the other day I paid a visit to St Pancras International just because I enjoy admiring the station. But one thing I didn't admire was seeing a large line of people waiting for the check-in to open for a Eurostar departure about 90 minutes later. Given that the station has practically reached capacity, and seeing as the biggest obstacle to new services along HS1 lies with capacity at St Pancras as well as the appropriate facilities at other European destinations, it seems like a very inefficient way of operating a rail service by treating it like an airport, especially if one of the advantages of trains is (in most cases) the ability to turn up at shorter notice than you would at an airport.
So with capacity at St Pancras restricting potential new services from London to Mainland Europe partly caused by the long check-in times and security checks, could Eurostar and other potential international operators operate with fewer checks to help reduce waiting and check-in times? Obviously since we're not in the Schengen zone we probably won't be treating it like regular train travel, but could we not simply have passengers turn up and scan their tickets and passports before being allowed to board the train instead of being checked in 45-90 minutes before departure, going through security checks, and then left waiting in a small lounge before finally being allowed to board the train?
I admittedly don't know too much about the ins-and-outs of border customs, but seeing as HS1 and Channel Tunnel capacity is underutilised, and with climate change pushing us to consider use more greener ways of travel, should we not be trying to encourage the use of high-speed rail wherever possible instead of treating it like an airport? It also might open up more possible destinations because it'll be much easier to set up ticket and passport scanning machines instead of a whole facility for security and check-in and waiting areas. But even if that wouldn't work, could there not be better and more efficient means of operating an international rail service, or is this truly the best we can do with what we have right now?
So with capacity at St Pancras restricting potential new services from London to Mainland Europe partly caused by the long check-in times and security checks, could Eurostar and other potential international operators operate with fewer checks to help reduce waiting and check-in times? Obviously since we're not in the Schengen zone we probably won't be treating it like regular train travel, but could we not simply have passengers turn up and scan their tickets and passports before being allowed to board the train instead of being checked in 45-90 minutes before departure, going through security checks, and then left waiting in a small lounge before finally being allowed to board the train?
I admittedly don't know too much about the ins-and-outs of border customs, but seeing as HS1 and Channel Tunnel capacity is underutilised, and with climate change pushing us to consider use more greener ways of travel, should we not be trying to encourage the use of high-speed rail wherever possible instead of treating it like an airport? It also might open up more possible destinations because it'll be much easier to set up ticket and passport scanning machines instead of a whole facility for security and check-in and waiting areas. But even if that wouldn't work, could there not be better and more efficient means of operating an international rail service, or is this truly the best we can do with what we have right now?