But is it practical - or even possible - to count the number of passengers who could be affected, on anything up to half a dozen trains, to find the utilitarian solution? Especially in the time available
Sometimes it would be pretty straightforward, other times less so.
I was going to mention this. Myself and a friend were heading to the Windermere Airshow last year but the service was 10 minutes late into Preston and lost further time at Lancaster. We must have 'missed' the TPE at Oxenholme by 12 minutes but they held it, which is just as well given the amount of people who got off the Virgin service there heading for Windermere.
This would have been a more straight forward occasion! I would guess the number of travellers for Windermere far exceeded those already on the branch train, and there was sufficient turn round time and slakc toe nsure that the return service from Windermere could leave at the right time.
I've known of a connecting service to wait a good 45mins-1 hour before now, might have something to do with one of the arriva directors wanting it mind...
Is this one of those lovely railway urban myths?!
I'm sure they can, and some may do, but I've seen a taxi bill for over £750 before, but the people in the taxi could have been told to get a train 1/3 of the way there then a taxi, and would have been happy in a hotel, and travel the next day, which would have cost a lot less.
I'm not saying that the system is perfect, or that there's not money that can be saved! I suspect that there are quite a few occasions where a train and taxi combination would be cheaper!