Classes not involved in accident's

[P156KWJ]

dont know if anybody has said this but what about 150's

there have been a few minor depot collisions, a recent one being a 150/2 after having an arguement with a 144. (Quote from driver9000, ask him for details)

 

[O L Leigh]

There have been two Cl150/2 vehicles scrapped because of accident damage following seperate heavy collisions with road vehicles on crossings (I think). This was way back in the 1980's and BR ordered up an extra Cl158 to cover for the loss. Not sure of the unit and vehicle numbers, but someone will know.

Before anyone nominates Cl317's, there was a Cl317 vehicle written off at Cricklewood when new. Someone got a bit enthusiastic with a Peak with "hilarious consequences". Click and, er, click.

BREL York just knocked up a new one and no-one was any the wiser.

O L Leigh

 

[P156KWJ]

class 185s?

class 156s have had rather bad luck hock: http://members.madasafish.com/~dysgraphyk/156/class156_mishaps.htm

 

[1D53]

185's were in an Crossing accident at Barrow and 110 was derailed in Ardwick and had to go back to Germany to repair.

 

[FusionRail]

An alumicart hasnt had an accident :razz:

 

[EE Type 3]

An alumicart hasnt had an accident :razz:

Just wait for the flood of posts from everyone proving you wrong

 

[hairyhandedfool]

class 185s?

class 156s have had rather bad luck hock: http://members.madasafish.com/~dysgraphyk/156/class156_mishaps.htm

That'll be the 156 that was hit at 3mph by a 56 with loaded HAAs then.

 

[FusionRail]

I just shot myself in the foot there as I found it in pieces