• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 810 for East Midlands Railway Construction/Introduction Updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

liamf656

Established Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
1,733
Location
Derby
Current plan is September time. There are 4 '810-ready' diagrams which can be made Class 810 operated whenever they are ready.

The full rollout will be complete by December 2026
Have you got a source for this info? Even if it's true I don't actually see them in service that soon
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,387
There was a bit in the Rail magazine from two weeks ago about it. I'll see if I can take a photo later.
I take what RAIL magazine print with a pinch of salt.
I believe that article mentions 10 car testing complete, or nearly complete? (Can’t remember the wording), however 10 car testing has not even commenced yet.

In the article they quote unit numbers in testing phase and routine testing, but repeat unit numbers , there is no accuracy or fact checking with what they write.
Also they state units up to 810021 are in assembly, but then say vehicles from 027 are involved in climate chamber testing. Nothing makes sense in the article.
 

tram21

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
1,341
Location
Nottingham
I take what RAIL magazine print with a pinch of salt.
I believe that article mentions 10 car testing complete, or nearly complete? (Can’t remember the wording), however 10 car testing has not even commenced yet.

In the article they quote unit numbers in testing phase and routine testing, but repeat unit numbers , there is no accuracy or fact checking with what they write.
Also they state units up to 810021 are in assembly, but then say vehicles from 027 are involved in climate chamber testing. Nothing makes sense in the article.
I do tend to agree. I had heard the September/ Autumn date elsewhere too, but we'll see if it happens. At this point we can just hope testing continues to go well, and hopefully we'll be able to ride them soon.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,224
Location
West Wiltshire
Current plan is September time. There are 4 '810-ready' diagrams which can be made Class 810 operated whenever they are ready.

The full rollout will be complete by December 2026
I will believe it when they enter service.

The order was placed in July 2019, so that will be over 6 years (and at time of ordering were due to enter service in 2022), so running 3-4 years late

 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,816
Location
SW London
It's not just the seats that are not well maintained ...
Had a trip on a 222 to Sheffield and back last week. It seemed to be very well maintained (apart from one toilet out of order). Certainly nothing wrong with the seats.

How can they be so much better than the Voyagers, which are basically the same body and underfloor?
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Had a trip on a 222 to Sheffield and back last week. It seemed to be very well maintained (apart from one toilet out of order). Certainly nothing wrong with the seats.

How can they be so much better than the Voyagers, which are basically the same body and underfloor?

They’re a later evolution of the design, albeit I think the Voyagers are also fairly bombproof mechanically?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Current plan is September time. There are 4 '810-ready' diagrams which can be made Class 810 operated whenever they are ready.

The full rollout will be complete by December 2026

That certainly isn’t anything that’s been announced internally. Training is expected to commence this year.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I take what RAIL magazine print with a pinch of salt.
I believe that article mentions 10 car testing complete, or nearly complete? (Can’t remember the wording), however 10 car testing has not even commenced yet.

In the article they quote unit numbers in testing phase and routine testing, but repeat unit numbers , there is no accuracy or fact checking with what they write.
Also they state units up to 810021 are in assembly, but then say vehicles from 027 are involved in climate chamber testing. Nothing makes sense in the article.

Rather poor and lazy journalism really.
 
Last edited:

tram21

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
1,341
Location
Nottingham
That certainly isn’t anything that’s been announced internally. Training is expected to commence this year.
Ah okay my apologies. That's what I had understood from an internal source but I may have been mistaken. Let's hope for at least one diagram before the end of the year!
 

Discuss223

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2024
Messages
375
Location
Rowsley
I will believe it when they enter service.

The order was placed in July 2019, so that will be over 6 years (and at time of ordering were due to enter service in 2022), so running 3-4 years late

If I recall correctly, the Class 222, predecessors of 810s were ordered in 2002 and delivered in to service by late 2004, just two and a half years later. This goes to highlight how humorously lengthy the introduction of Auroras is turning out to be.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Ah okay my apologies. That's what I had understood from an internal source but I may have been mistaken.

No worries - there are always rumours! It has been stated internally that diagrams are going to be remaining roughly as they now are until they 810s are introduced. They’ve been fairly tight lipped about specific dates, probably rightly, because it keeps slipping. The article mentioned above is miles off and mostly nonsense.

Let's hope for at least one diagram before the end of the year!

Absolutely mate. Training should be well under way by the end of the year, so entry into service in 2026 seems feasible, based on a “finger in the air”.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Beginning to wonder now if they've been following the SWR guide to introducing new traction...

The stock is still being built and tested - very much not the same situation as SWR where most of the 701 fleet was physically built and handed over years ago!
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,387
Beginning to wonder now if they've been following the SWR guide to introducing new traction...
Don’t think we can blame EMR for this, from my sources from both Hitachi and EMR, the blame (99%) lays firmly with Hitachi.

Poor project management, poor workmanship on the unit.

EMR are just as bewildered as the rest of us regards these units.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,470
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
The stock is still being built and tested - very much not the same situation as SWR where most of the 701 fleet was physically built and handed over years ago!
Don’t think we can blame EMR for this, from my sources from both Hitachi and EMR, the blame (99%) lays firmly with Hitachi.

Poor project management, poor workmanship on the unit.

EMR are just as bewildered as the rest of us regards these units.
Thanks to you both, I am both better informed and humbled.
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,515
I will believe it when they enter service.

The order was placed in July 2019, so that will be over 6 years (and at time of ordering were due to enter service in 2022), so running 3-4 years late
Indeed, for whatever reasons it’s a great shame such a sizeable part of the industry has totally lost the plot on introducing new stock in reasonable timescales post Covid.
 
Last edited:

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Don’t think we can blame EMR for this, from my sources from both Hitachi and EMR, the blame (99%) lays firmly with Hitachi.

Poor project management, poor workmanship on the unit.

EMR are just as bewildered as the rest of us regards these units.

Covid is still trotted out, but that’s wearing a bit thin when the start of the pandemic is coming up to five years ago now, hard to believe as that is.
 
Last edited:

liamf656

Established Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
1,733
Location
Derby
Covid is still trotted out, but that’s wearing a bit thin when the start of the pandemic is coming up to five years ago now, hard to believe as that is.
How long was production affected by Covid, directly? Because I think even if the demic had never happened we'd still be waiting a long time for these trains!

Had a trip on a 222 to Sheffield and back last week. It seemed to be very well maintained (apart from one toilet out of order). Certainly nothing wrong with the seats.

How can they be so much better than the Voyagers, which are basically the same body and underfloor?
Bombardier had learned from the Voyagers and tweaked the bits that were less than average when building the 222s. The lack of tilt in the Meridians is also a bonus as it meant they didn't need to narrow the body making it feel airy. The recent reupholstering in standard class is also well received.

Unfortunately a few let downs are the ongoing issues with the TMS/reservations, WiFi, the toilets and the high usage of tape holding things together. I'd imagine it is difficult though given that the loss of the 180s has stretched the fleet very thinly. Hopefully the 222s get a good refurbishment post-EMR and become amazing units again
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,224
Location
West Wiltshire
How long was production affected by Covid, directly? Because I think even if the demic had never happened we'd still be waiting a long time for these trains!
The covid restrictions were reintroduced by area, so there is no exact duration, but 13-16 months is the usually accepted as cumulative disruption period.

Being generous anyone claiming a delay of over 18 months is solely due to covid is not being 100% honest.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,795
Location
Somewhere, not in London
One does also need to consider the changes brought in by the EU-Exit Regulations and transitioning from TSI to NTSN regulations and this being one of the first 'new' fleets since then.

Also the significant challenges of the many, many technical changes and wish list for this fleet when compared with running off some more of the same.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,292
How long was production affected by Covid, directly? Because I think even if the demic had never happened we'd still be waiting a long time for these trains!


Bombardier had learned from the Voyagers and tweaked the bits that were less than average when building the 222s. The lack of tilt in the Meridians is also a bonus as it meant they didn't need to narrow the body making it feel airy. The recent reupholstering in standard class is also well received.

Unfortunately a few let downs are the ongoing issues with the TMS/reservations, WiFi, the toilets and the high usage of tape holding things together. I'd imagine it is difficult though given that the loss of the 180s has stretched the fleet very thinly. Hopefully the 222s get a good refurbishment post-EMR and become amazing units again
Do the 222s not still use a tapered bodyshell? I thought they did
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
3,991
Location
Northampton
As far as I’m aware, and given that they are intensively used, Etches Park is doing the best they can for the 222s.

Had a trip on a 222 to Sheffield and back last week. It seemed to be very well maintained (apart from one toilet out of order). Certainly nothing wrong with the seats.

How can they be so much better than the Voyagers, which are basically the same body and underfloor?

It's the attention to detail that I had in mind, summed up by

/snip/

Unfortunately a few let downs are the ongoing issues with the TMS/reservations, WiFi, the toilets and the high usage of tape holding things together. I'd imagine it is difficult though given that the loss of the 180s has stretched the fleet very thinly. Hopefully the 222s get a good refurbishment post-EMR and become amazing units again

The impression is created that once something's broken that's that; for instance, when a lavatory soap dispenser is broken it seems that, rather than repair it, there's just a supply of soap bottles, and when the vestibule door buttons don't work there's a (printed, house colours) label attached advising to use the foot stud.

It may be that expenditure on maintenance is very restricted because the trains only have a short-term future with EMR but there's a problem with that; before being returned to the lessees all these defects will have to be repaired anyway. For instance, the problem with vestibule door buttons is said to be that they are obsolete implying not longer made but that will have presumably have to be resolved before the trains are returned.

On the other hand, station staff and on-board people that I encounter are among the friendliest and most helpful anywhere on the network. That's why the tatty toilets, non-working doors - and seemingly always dirty windows - are such a disappointment.
 

tram21

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
1,341
Location
Nottingham
On the other hand, station staff and on-board people that I encounter are among the friendliest and most helpful anywhere on the network.
Completely agree, its the main reason I enjoy travelling with EMR because the onboard staff are always amazing
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
6,194
It may be that expenditure on maintenance is very restricted because the trains only have a short-term future with EMR but there's a problem with that; before being returned to the lessees all these defects will have to be repaired anyway. For instance, the problem with vestibule door buttons is said to be that they are obsolete implying not longer made but that will have presumably have to be resolved before the trains are returned.
The buttons look pretty similar to hundreds of other door buttons used on many different types of unit. Even if they are obsolete, precuring a different type shouldn't be that hard. As you say, all the defects will need sorting before the units are handed back, so they might as well get on with it now. They are very tightly diagrammed. I did have the diagrams but I have mislaid them. I think it is 24 diagrams for 27 units.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,470
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
As you say, all the defects will need sorting before the units are handed back, so they might as well get on with it now. They are very tightly diagrammed. I did have the diagrams but I have mislaid them. I think it is 24 diagrams for 27 units.
Of course it could be with that high level of availability that they can't do anything other than routine maintenance. Might the Rosco get them back as is and get Widnes (or somewhere) to rectify faults, then invoice EMR?
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,195
Of course it could be with that high level of availability that they can't do anything other than routine maintenance. Might the Rosco get them back as is and get Widnes (or somewhere) to rectify faults, then invoice EMR?
Yes that’s spot on. Unplanned maintenance is undertaken at Central Rivers due to limited capacity at Etches Park, but this results in more units than normal being out of traffic. I’m not sure what arrangements will be made wrt handback.
 

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
15,337
Yes that’s spot on. Unplanned maintenance is undertaken at Central Rivers due to limited capacity at Etches Park, but this results in more units than normal being out of traffic. I’m not sure what arrangements will be made wrt handback.
You would think (hope?) that at handback they would go for a proper mid life refurb before heading to a new operator so in reality what would be the point in fixing relatively minor trim and button type issues that absolutely create a very poor impression for the current passenger, but would go in the scrap bin when any proper refurb work go underway.

Tho I admit this is to assume that DfT would think the passengers paying their ever increasing fares actually deserve properly maintained and smart trains to travel in...both now and when moved to a new user where there capacity is no doubt desperately needed.
 

Top