• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 707 - SWT: Introduction into service

Status
Not open for further replies.

700007

Established Member
Joined
6 May 2017
Messages
1,272
Location
Near a bunch of sheds that aren't 66s.
Yup, a disappointed me is at Clapham Junction knowing it has been cancelled. Several members of staff are saying they will attempt to try run the train next week, but failing that, it will be September instead at SWR. They will not run during the duration of the Waterloo works.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

simple simon

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
728
Location
Suburban London
707s are booked to run their first passenger service on Friday. Although there's a caveat on the schedule that says should the passenger workings be cancelled at short notice regular 5Q test trips run instead...

1Z31 0913 CLJ to RDG
2Z32 1052 RDG to SNS
2Z33 1158 SNS to RDG
2Z34 1252 RDG to SNS
2Z35 1428 SNS to RDG
2Z37 1522 RDG to SNS

Let's see if they run...

Is it remotely likely that these journeys will carry passengers next week?

Simon (with camcorder in mind!)
 

Monty

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2012
Messages
2,370
Does anyone know the calling pattern for the 0913 Clapham Junction to Reading? RTT still hasn't got it logged in, I imagine Richmond, Twickenham, Feltham, Staines, Egham, Virginia Water, Sunningdale and all stations to Reading?

Wandsworth Town, Putney, Barnes, Ascot, Wokingham & Reading.
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,386
SWT have tweeted 'late Autumn' for entry into service, sounds like November to me.

Indeed, it was I who asked them. Seems they are still having software issues according to the Siemens guy I spoke to last week at Reading.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
And rather embarrassingly, the 345 has beaten it into service, despite the testing of the 707 being described as well underway whilst the first 345 was only just heading for Old Dalby*, whilst Siemens were introducing what was fundamentally just a 700 clone, whilst the 345 was a whole new family of trains (the extent to which this is true is something that can be argued about however!)

*Admittedly, the 345 had been on the Derby test track since May, but equally the first 707 will have also been running around long before heading to Wildenrath
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
At least one, looked like two 707s, on New Cross Gate Depot today as per earlier suggestion

What colour were they painted? I could understand a 700 being parked there, but can't see why a 707 would be parked there
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,386
At least one, looked like two 707s, on New Cross Gate Depot today as per earlier suggestion

I wouldn't mind a bet on this being the likely suspect. Departed last night, arrived early hours. Can't see any other reason for a move from wim.pk.
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,386
That'll be 001 and 002 then. I wonder if they're looking to see if any of the software issues are present on AC as well as on DC.?

Edit: just passed them a minute ago, still in same place.
 
Last edited:

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,176
Actually, I've just realised this, NXG is the three-letter code for the station. Depot codes are two letters, for New Cross Gate TMD this is NG.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,607
Location
Croydon
Rash guess but maybe Siemens or the ROSCO want a second opinion on the 707s from someone other than SWT. They are the Pantograph fitted ones but perhaps some testing on a line with newer third rail (out of New Cross depot onto the ELL) was thought representative.
 
Last edited:

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,386
What could happen if they don't soon get sorted out? Does the receiving leasing company have the right to retract the whole order if they're not up to scratch within a certain time frame?
 

CosherB

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2007
Messages
3,041
Location
Northwich
What could happen if they don't soon get sorted out? Does the receiving leasing company have the right to retract the whole order if they're not up to scratch within a certain time frame?

Who knows, depends what was in the purchasing contract. More likely to be along the lines of liquidated damages before the likes of outright rejection is considered.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,607
Location
Croydon
What could happen if they don't soon get sorted out? Does the receiving leasing company have the right to retract the whole order if they're not up to scratch within a certain time frame?

I think until they accept one into service it is not the ROSCOs problem. I imagine Siemens' field engineer resources are focused on the getting the 700s into service and keeping them going. So perhaps the 707s are relatively neglected ?.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,270
Rash guess but maybe Siemens or the ROSCO want a second opinion on the 707s from someone other than SWT. They are the Pantograph fitted ones but perhaps some testing on a line with newer third rail (out of New Cross depot onto the ELL) was thought representative.

Perhaps they just wanted to do some planned maintenance on the 25 kV systems as it fell due, and the facility at NX depot was available at the right time? There's a risk of overcomplicating matters.

Presumably if they'd done any hypothetical third rail testing on the ELL we'd have heard about the movements by now?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top