• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 701 'Aventra' trains for South Western Railway: progress updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JulienD

Member
Joined
21 Dec 2025
Messages
46
Location
Slough
701001 - In Passenger Service (2 Mar 26)
701002 - Training duties
701003 - Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane
701004 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701005 - In Passenger Service (27 Aug 25)
701006 - In Passenger Service (6 Mar 26)
701007 - In Passenger Service (24 Feb 26)
701008 - In Passenger Service (31 Mar 26)
701009 - In Passenger Service (17 Oct 25)
701010 - In Passenger Service (22 Dec 25)
701011 - In Passenger Service (26 Feb 26)
701012 - In Passenger Service (21 Jul 25)
701013 - In Passenger Service (28 Jul 25)

701014 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701015 - Training duties
701016 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701017 - In Passenger Service (25 Nov 24)
701018 - In Passenger Service (6 Jul 25)
701019 - In Passenger Service (18 Apr 26)
701020 - In Passenger Service (8 Oct 25)
701021 - In Passenger Service (15 Sep 25)
701022 - In Passenger Service (9 Feb 26)
701023 - In Passenger Service (7 Apr 26)

701024 - Training duties
701025 - In Passenger Service (24 Jun 25)
701026 - In Passenger Service (3 Nov 25)

701027 - Stored at Eastleigh
701028 - Training duties
701029 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701030 - In Passenger Service (9 Dec 25)
701031 - In Passenger Service (28 Oct 24)

701032 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701033 - In Passenger Service (26 Nov 25)
701034 - In Passenger Service (18 Mar 25)
701035 - In Passenger Service (28 May 25)
701036 - In Passenger Service (7 Mar 25)
701037 - In Passenger Service (9 Jan 24)
701038 - In Passenger Service (5 Feb 26)
701039 - In Passenger Service (10 Jan 24)

701040 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701041 - In Passenger Service (17 Jun 25)
701042 - In Passenger Service (21 May 25)
701043 - In Passenger Service (16 Jan 24)
701044 - In Passenger Service (5 Feb 25)
701045 - In Passenger Service (10 Apr 26)
701046 - In Passenger Service (17 Mar 25)
701047 - In Passenger Service (31 Dec 25)
701048 - In Passenger Service (8 Nov 25j
701049 - In Passenger Service (20 Mar 26)
701050 - In Passenger Service (17 Nov 25)
701051 - In Passenger Service (14 Jul 25)
701052 - In Passenger Service (23 Dec 25)
701053 - In Passenger Service (26 Aug 25)
701054 - In Passenger Service (3 Jan 26)
701055 - In Passenger Service (6 May 26)
701056 - In Passenger Service (8 Sep 25)
701057 - In Passenger Service (13 Aug 25)
701058 - In Passenger Service (11 Aug 25)
701059 - In Passenger Service (5 Dec 25)
701060 - In Passenger Service (1 Nov 25)


In Passenger Service: 48/60
Training duties: 4/60 (028 briefly served passengers before training duties)

SWR preparing for passenger service: 6/60
Stored at Eastleigh: 1/60
Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane: 1/60



701501 - Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane
701502 - Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane

701503 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701504 - SWR preparing for passenger service

701505 - Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane
701506 - Stored at Bicester
701507 - Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane
701508 - Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane

701509 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701510 - SWR preparing for passenger service

701511 - Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane
701512 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701513 - Stored at Bicester
701514 - Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane
701515 - Stored at Bicester
701516 - Stored at Bicester

701517 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701518 - Stored at Bicester
701519 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701520 - SWR preparing for passenger service

701521 - Stored at Bicester
701522 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701523 - Stored at Bicester
701524 - Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane
701525 - Stored at Bicester
701526 - Stored at Bicester
701527 - Stored at Bicester

701528 - SWR preparing for passenger service
701529 - SWR preparing for passenger service

701530 - Stored at Bicester

In Passenger Service: 0/30
SWR preparing for passenger service: 11/30
Stored at Derby Litchurch Lane: 8/30
Stored at Bicester 11/30
The 701527 and 701521 are getting driven to Wimbledon Park Depot Sidings as I speak on the https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K65802/2026-05-14/detailed
5Q87 1030 Bicester Mod Gbrf to Wimbledon Park Depot Sdgs !
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,472
No allocation today, so maybe tomorrow?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

701015 was running on a 5Txx headcode today, wonder if it'll come out to play in passenger service soon
There are only four units on the book which are currently passed for training but not yet passed for passenger service and 028 has been a long-term training unit so the other three are all not too far away from introduction into service I would say.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Many thanks. How long until these four units are released from training duties and made available for service? I assume the conversion courses are nearly complete now and that would release a couple at least?
From memory I think the required work can be done in two days if unit is urgently required for service, but don't quote me on that. 024 has been a static training unit in addition to 028. I'm not a training buff so don't know that side of matters much. I thought most of the depots are trained now so can't have many people left.
 
Last edited:

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,910
Location
London
No allocation today, so maybe tomorrow?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

701015 was running on a 5Txx headcode today, wonder if it'll come out to play in passenger service soon
Cet road testing at Feltham. 16 just left as 5Q22 from Waterloo P18
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,278
Location
West Wiltshire
701032 allocated to 2D05 0610 London Waterloo to Guildford this morning, don't think it's been in service previously:


Thank you, so that takes it to 49 units in service

With new timetable next week, how many diagrams are there, are they releasing more 450s for strengthening mainline workings.

Obviously still long way short of the diagramming planned when they were ordered 9 years ago which was nearer 67 daily diagrams
 

swr444

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2008
Messages
1,020
Location
London
Thank you, so that takes it to 49 units in service

With new timetable next week, how many diagrams are there, are they releasing more 450s for strengthening mainline workings.

Obviously still long way short of the diagramming planned when they were ordered 9 years ago which was nearer 67 daily diagrams
You’ll find more 450s on the Weybridge next week
 

Meglos

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2020
Messages
196
Location
london
701032 allocated to 2D05 0610 London Waterloo to Guildford this morning, don't think it's been in service previously:

And on it's 3rd ever service the 08:40 WAT-CSS (2D05) one of the toilets was already out of service!
 

Siemens Staines

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
1,552
Thanks. Seems like more focus on getting the 458/4s retired if Weybridge is getting 450s

From a cursory glance it looks like more inbound Reading trains then work to Weybridge, and conversely a lot of inbound Weybridge trains then work to Reading. Therefore many of the Windsor line diagrams are going to be quite different to now irrespective of traction type. I do not know for certain, but I presume this is as a consequence of the timetable change that results in Reading trains departing earlier so that they can call at Vauxhall.
 

Phillipimo

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2013
Messages
237
Location
Portsmouth
From a cursory glance it looks like more inbound Reading trains then work to Weybridge, and conversely a lot of inbound Weybridge trains then work to Reading. Therefore many of the Windsor line diagrams are going to be quite different to now irrespective of traction type. I do not know for certain, but I presume this is as a consequence of the timetable change that results in Reading trains departing earlier so that they can call at Vauxhall.
Yes it looks like the interworking evens out the turnaround times at Waterloo, otherwise Reading trains would only have 13 mins and Weybridge trains 25 mins. Now it's 21 mins for Weybridge forming Reading and 17 mins for Reading forming Weybridge.
 

JCO1406

Member
Joined
28 May 2024
Messages
192
Location
London
Is there a rough number of how many 701 diagrams for next week? I think there are around 42/43 diagrams currently.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,892
Yes it looks like the interworking evens out the turnaround times at Waterloo, otherwise Reading trains would only have 13 mins and Weybridge trains 25 mins. Now it's 21 mins for Weybridge forming Reading and 17 mins for Reading forming Weybridge.
That would explain it. Yet another slowdown on the Reading line. :rolleyes:
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
6,199
Yes it looks like the interworking evens out the turnaround times at Waterloo, otherwise Reading trains would only have 13 mins and Weybridge trains 25 mins. Now it's 21 mins for Weybridge forming Reading and 17 mins for Reading forming Weybridge.
Is 13 minutes not enough? I firmly believe that going back to seven self contained diagrams to Reading would improve performance. They seem to be going the wrong way.
 

mansonlo49

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2023
Messages
1,019
Location
uk
701032 allocated to 2D05 0610 London Waterloo to Guildford this morning, don't think it's been in service previously:

Finally in service, just 040 left then the second half would be in service
 

Ian Hardy

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
462
Is 13 minutes not enough? I firmly believe that going back to seven self contained diagrams to Reading would improve performance. They seem to be going the wrong way.
If everything is running on time then yes, but before 07:30 the Weybridge to Waterloo services run 4 minutes in front of the Reading services from Virginia Water to Feltham Junction. The Weybridge services are usually 1 or 2 minutes late at Staines and then stop at Ashford which the Readings don't so they will eat into those 13 minutes. After 07:30 the Weybridge services sit at Virginia Water for 9 minutes and then invaribly follow a late Reading service but with a 25 layover at Waterloo the effects are not so much of a problem.
 

Big Jumby 74

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2022
Messages
2,254
Location
UK
Is 13 minutes not enough?
It should be. It was substantially less in BR/SWT days, but since then passenger numbers have soared combined with other reliability issues, so am guessing there is felt a need to add extra resilience in to the overall plan?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,892
It should be. It was substantially less in BR/SWT days, but since then passenger numbers have soared combined with other reliability issues, so am guessing there is felt a need to add extra resilience in to the overall plan?
The alternative would have been to leave the service pattern as it was and not slow the Reading service yet again.
 

London Trains

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2017
Messages
1,238
Is 13 minutes not enough? I firmly believe that going back to seven self contained diagrams to Reading would improve performance. They seem to be going the wrong way.
I do hope the timetable refresh next year can massively reduce the amount of interworking across different routes and try to make as many routes as possible self-contained, as the current situation is a bit of a mess and makes recovering from disruption extremely difficult.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,910
Location
London
There’s some readings going to 701 and some weybridges going 450. I don’t have time to go through and type them out sorry.
Yikes, 450s are inadequate for weybridges, surprised they didnt fling them on the Readings as they can actually keep cloae to time on those on average :{
 

Top