701 028Could we have an update please on which sets have now been in public service (or a reference to an older but still current post)?
And 701017701 028
701 031
701 036
701 037
701 039
701 043
You're correct, I'm sure my Middleton press Wimbledon to Epsom book mentions Worcester Park had non stop trains to Waterloo which took about 17 minutes back in the steam age, so similar to the Surbiton to Waterloo non stop trains now.I am convinced it now takes longer to get from Worcester Park to Waterloo than it did in the steam era. I was in Orpington the other day and took a nonstop train to London Bridge which took 15 minutes. You can double that on SWR for a much shorter distance.
Could we have an update please on which sets have now been in public service (or a reference to an older but still current post)?
Approved!Bring back slam door stock!!
701044 worked the 5Q45 last week on the 5th.Realtime Trains | 5Q45 1513 London Waterloo to Clapham Yard Sidings | 10/02/2025
Real-time train running information for 5Q45 1513 departure from London Waterloo to Clapham Yard Sidings on 10/02/2025. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
701044 stretching its legs it seems, last seen Sept 24 at Waterloo.
701025 of the training trains, i believe is the most utilised unit that has yet to do a passenger run.
Oh lovely assumed it was unit 025701044 worked the 5Q45 last week on the 5th.
Nothing there was a PA that went live on some crew diagrams this morning, if it was coming in for February surely it would have been today.Any news on the additional February diagrams yet?
Labour Ministers now run the DfT, do we know if have they have had any impact on the 701 introduction to date? And will they likely have any when SWR is taken over shortly?Until the DfT are taken out of the decision making process with the 701 “introduction”, no management is going to be able to reset working relationships. It has been a litany of interference, change of tack, interference, and repeat.
If I was a cynic, when they take over they change a director or two, make a few minor changes to the plan and then claim it as a major change but they will still be calling the shots. The only difference is that, not having to pay fees, there might be a bit more money to do things.
My thoughts exactlyHow about having no doors. Seems to work in India.
Existing Trained Drivers, Trainers themselves etc. A 5T however is usually a test train for route testing of the unit or pti etcForgive the daft question, but if training has stopped, who are these training runs training?
701025We have had the 701s used in passenger service listed a few times (see above), but what about those used for training - are these regular units or do they change over with those in store/stabled at the likes of Farnham ? If anyone can list those used it would be useful.
A bit of history in response to one or two titbits on the last couple of pages:
Yes, it was fairly common for journey times from various outer suburban places to Waterloo to be faster in BR times (e.g Horsley to Waterloo used to be 39 to 40 minutes on the best trains; now takes 45 to 50 or so, depending on time of day). Reasons include: less congested network, allowing more such trains to run fast after Surbiton; more padding/recovery time now added in timetables, to reduce delay payments and complaints, presumably; and that slam-door stock loaded and unloaded faster.
Many commuters actually preferred slam doors. The added injury risk was judged to be worth it, for the benefits of passengers being in control and able to get off as soon as the train stopped; and having the service provided by simple, faster, reliable trains. Where people complained, this was more likely to be about cold draughts from the doors than anything else.
Of course we are in a different era now with society having less tolerance of risk, greater expectations of comfort, and more litigation. Not possible to turn the clocks back.
And the doors would be opened while the train was still at walking (or even running) pace, with several passengers per door already on the platform by the time the train stopped.Is it simply that with slam doors there were more doors in each carriage passengers could alight from, meaning dwell times were much shorter?
Indeed, like the old routemasters, you'd have passengers already getting off the train before its come to a full complete stop, usually about 1-3mph on video you'd see passengers already alighting. Some cases by the time the train fully stops at a terminus at least half of the train would have alightedIs it simply that with slam doors there were more doors in each carriage passengers could alight from, meaning dwell times were much shorter?
The big timetable recast in 2004(?) added extra dwell time at most stations on the suburban lines, to improve reliability. Also removed some of the faster / skip stop trains such as the Dorkings that ran fast from Wimbledon to Worcester Park.Is it simply that with slam doors there were more doors in each carriage passengers could alight from, meaning dwell times were much shorter?
These runs are platform train interface test runs.Forgive the daft question, but if training has stopped, who are these training runs training?
Labour Ministers now run the DfT, do we know if have they have had any impact on the 701 introduction to date? And will they likely have any when SWR is taken over shortly?
Non-interlocked sliding doors would also do the trick.Indeed, like the old routemasters, you'd have passengers already getting off the train before its come to a full complete stop, usually about 1-3mph on video you'd see passengers already alighting. Some cases by the time the train fully stops at a terminus at least half of the train would have alighted

Current londoners on their phones cannot be trusted with theseNon-interlocked sliding doors would also do the trick.
Here's one I was on on Sunday.....View attachment 174393
Photo of train with non-interlocked sliding doors
Forgot that one!!!And 701017
and non-stop peak trains in SUB age. Need to dig out an old timetable to see how long they were booked to take.You're correct, I'm sure my Middleton press Wimbledon to Epsom book mentions Worcester Park had non stop trains to Waterloo which took about 17 minutes back in the steam age, so similar to the Surbiton to Waterloo non stop trains now.