Goldfish62
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 13,235
Or GWR staff travelling PASS on Cross Country. They're not allowed in the cab.What’s the difference to a freight operator travelling PASS on an train where they travel in the saloon?
Or GWR staff travelling PASS on Cross Country. They're not allowed in the cab.What’s the difference to a freight operator travelling PASS on an train where they travel in the saloon?
What’s the difference to a freight operator travelling PASS on an train where they travel in the saloon?
When travelling pass, or at anytime staff travelling free or on a reduced price ticket are expected to stand if full fair paying passengers require a seat. It would also be logical that if the service is very busy fair paying passengers should board first, then staff afterwards. They make the rules so they must be followed.Or GWR staff travelling PASS on Cross Country. They're not allowed in the cab.
Indeed, pleasantly surprised by how quiet they are.Could be forgiven for thinking they don’t have traction motors!
To me they sound exactly like the 710s.Indeed, pleasantly surprised by how quiet they are.
It had been posted in this thread a few weeks ago:Not sure if this has been posted anywhere yet, but here is the official briefing about the explosions:-
Yes it was out all week as well, clocking up its ffr miles. Well, hopefully.!701022 was out today working 5Q51
FFR?Yes it was out all week as well, clocking up its ffr miles. Well, hopefully.!![]()
Fault-free running, I imagine.FFR?
For the first time since Jan 21 Rock Rail South Western plc (the entity leasing trains to SWR) has raised charges (allows their financiers to take the units if they don't pay the interest and capital on the loan) for the following units
701004
701016
701019
701023
701025
701029
701032
701035
This ought to be an indicator that their customer [SWR] now have some confidence in the trains as they [RRSW] now own them outright and maybe it presages potential progress to the next stage towards service introduction but equally it could just be a contractual requirement between Alstom and Rock Rail.
Or ones that have achieved fault-free running?Quite a random (has lots of gaps) list, not clear to me why they have apparently been completed and transferred and others haven’t.
Are these the less badly built ones, or are they just being finished off in a non sequential way.
Thank youFault-free running, I imagine.
Nope, switched off with the removable red lamp since at least mid May.Passed through Clapham Junction yesterday to see 701025 still in the yard. Has this moved at all in the last few months !?
It was there on the 13th May so I suspect your right!Nope, switched off with the removable red lights since at least mid May.
Hasn't Alstom (when Bombardier) used it for refurbs in the past? So could be undertaking work there rather than Derby as it should be closer (thus cheaper movement wise)701030 has been dragged (by 47727) to Ilford EMUD this morning. Storage I assume?
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K00005/2022-07-11/detailed#allox_id=0
Ah yes good point, I'd forgotten about the Alstom place there.Hasn't Alstom (when Bombardier) used it for refurbs in the past? So could be undertaking work there rather than Derby as it should be closer (thus cheaper movement wise)
Here is 701 030 at Stratford. The drag was confirmed as 47 727.701030 has been dragged (by 47727) to Ilford EMUD this morning. Storage I assume?
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K00005/2022-07-11/detailed#allox_id=0
Think of the staff who are working all day in them. It is horrendous. The driver gets "comfort cooling" which might take the edge of the high 20s but doesn't do much above 30. The guard gets nothing at all...On a rare SWR 455 journey today, very unpleasant in the heat, and will be intolerable for anyone having to travel on Monday and Tuesday
It's crazy, by law I believe there is a minimum temperature beyond which workers can't be forced to work, but as far as I know there's no upper limit. That's what a previous employer told me anyway.Think of the staff who are working all day in them. It is horrendous. The driver gets "comfort cooling" which might take the edge of the high 20s but doesn't do much above 30. The guard gets nothing at all...
You are correct.It's crazy, by law I believe there is a minimum temperature beyond which workers can't be forced to work, but as far as I know there's no upper limit. That's what a previous employer told me anyway.
I think that the current legislation has a minimum working temperature of 16 deg C (60.8 F) withing 1 hour of work commencement. This was established at least as far back as 1961 in the Factories act and the Offices Shops and Railway premises act in 1963. There are far worse workplaces than on a train without air conditioning, e.g. restaurant kitchens, but there are no maximum working temperatures although employers are consider the suitability of the conditions for the specific role.It's crazy, by law I believe there is a minimum temperature beyond which workers can't be forced to work, but as far as I know there's no upper limit. That's what a previous employer told me anyway.