nlogax
Established Member
Reading the continuing saga of both the 458s and 456s, how unusual is this run of unfortunate teething troubles in the context of new / refurbed EMU deliveries over the years?
In the late 80s I recall the 442s being the butt of enthusiast jokes during test runs with faulty plug and cable hatch doors, but the woes listed here seem to dwarf the problems of that era. Is it just that we have so much more information in infinite detail now, or are these units properly buggered in a way not seen before in third-rail territory?
In the late 80s I recall the 442s being the butt of enthusiast jokes during test runs with faulty plug and cable hatch doors, but the woes listed here seem to dwarf the problems of that era. Is it just that we have so much more information in infinite detail now, or are these units properly buggered in a way not seen before in third-rail territory?