• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 319

Status
Not open for further replies.

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,665
Thameslink refurbished some units back in 2005. Would this have been the early stages of the programme fcc saw to completion?

Why did the connex units have a pole extending from the ceiling in the lounge area?

How did fcc source the Ashbourne seating to replace the lounge area on the 319/2s?

What happened to all 319/0 and 319/2s in southern livery receiving advertising livery?

Do 319/2s have a carpet throughout?
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,501
Location
DTOS A or B
Thameslink refurbished some units back in 2005. Would this have been the early stages of the programme fcc saw to completion?

Why did the connex units have a pole extending from the ceiling in the lounge area?

How did fcc source the Ashbourne seating to replace the lounge area on the 319/2s?

What happened to all 319/0 and 319/2s in southern livery receiving advertising livery?

Do 319/2s have a carpet throughout?


The pole used to house the electrical supplies for coffee machines.

Seats sourced for internal spares no doubt.

The vinyls seamed to die a death after the mobile one.

/2's only have carpet in first class, and doormat material in doorways. With the rest old style vinyl ( apart from the old snug area which is the new style FCC vinyl).
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
....Why did the connex units have a pole extending from the ceiling in the lounge area?...

If you mean the reasonable large metallic column with an oval cross-section in the lounge area, you will find all 319s have them, but that the rest are not metallic in colour, or oval, or as big. I'm reasonable sure all Mk3 based AC EMUs have them.

As for what they are there for, well, the pantograph is directly above them and main transformer is below them, I'll let you work out the rest.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,501
Location
DTOS A or B
If you mean the reasonable large metallic column with an oval cross-section in the lounge area, you will find all 319s have them, but that the rest are not metallic in colour, or oval, or as big. I'm reasonable sure all Mk3 based AC EMUs have them.

As for what they are there for, well, the pantograph is directly above them and main transformer is below them, I'll let you work out the rest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:3192_breakfast_bar.jpg

Shows two poles I was on about the smaller of the two, obviously the large one contains the HV cable. There was one /2 different than the rest as it had a long serving counter fitted it would go from the partition to near the HV cable and had cupboards fitted to it iirc a coffee chain set up shop on board.
 
Last edited:

47802

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
3,454
I hope these trains get a decent refurb when they go up north rather than a northern style refurb, to say these trains were built in the late 80's the original interior was more like something from the 70's.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,666
I hope these trains get a decent refurb when they go up north rather than a northern style refurb, to say these trains were built in the late 80's the original interior was more like something from the 70's.

Northern have only really refreshed stock recently.

Anyway the original plan was to have a full refurb.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
I hope these trains get a decent refurb when they go up north rather than a northern style refurb, to say these trains were built in the late 80's the original interior was more like something from the 70's.

They will feel hard done by if the refurbishment is not thorough and scream about a North-South-divide. After all, we've only had them mostly unchanged for 25 years (and probably a few more). :roll:

Meanwhile, up north in Desiros and Voyagers...
 
Last edited:

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
They will feel hard done by if the refurbishment is not thorough and scream about a North-South-divide. After all, we've only had them mostly unchanged for 25 years (and probably a few more). :roll:

Meanwhile, up north in Desiros and Voyagers...

Given the choice I would rather have the 319 refurbished or not! ;)
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Given the choice I would rather have the 319 refurbished or not! ;)

They're not bad trains by any means, but having used them regularly for the majority of my life, I can say they have changed very little. Heating that works consistently would be a good place to start improvements!
 
Last edited:

47802

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
3,454
They will feel hard done by if the refurbishment is not thorough and scream about a North-South-divide. After all, we've only had them mostly unchanged for 25 years (and probably a few more). :roll:

Meanwhile, up north in Desiros and Voyagers...

and Rail Buses!

and of course there's not much new stock down south is there, well apart from

350, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 444, 450, 458 and to come 377/6, 377/7,
387, 700, 345.
 

petersi

Member
Joined
24 Apr 2012
Messages
453
and Rail Buses!

and of course there's not much new stock down south is there, well apart from

350, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 444, 450, 458 and to come 377/6, 377/7,
387, 700, 345.

It seams you get new stock if a politicians pet project includes it.
Where I live there is no sign of replacement of 313's. Even though they will be 40 in 2017.
But we will get new trains for Thameslink services.


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
and Rail Buses!

and of course there's not much new stock down south is there, well apart from

350, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 444, 450, 458 and to come 377/6, 377/7,
387, 700, 345.

And obviously London, the Brighton Main Line and South Eastern Main Line constitute the entire South of England. Meanwhile, down in Devon and Cornwall there are the very same rail buses!

Taking North as being Birmingham area and up, we have 139, 170, 172, 175, 180, 185, 220, 221, 222, 323, 333, 350s. If we include Scotland we also have 334s, 380s. Let's also not forget that the north had Sprinters decades before most of the SE had power door stock.

But we can't let reality get in the way ;).
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
and Rail Buses!

and of course there's not much new stock down south is there, well apart from

350, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 444, 450, 458 .

How old was the stock they replaced again?
I have forgotten! ;)
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,350
Location
Yorkshire
Meanwhile, up north in Desiros and Voyagers...

Whenever there's a (often justified) moan about stock up North, the few examples of modern stock that operates above Birmingham (185s/Voyagers/333s/Pendolinos) are cited as proof that the North as a whole has somehow seen just as much of an improvement as London and the South East.

The 185/170s of TPE are really intended to be a 'premium' service, at least in terms of how the service is marketed. Indeed they are fine (and expensive!) units if something of a compromise between commuter/long-distance accomodation. However they only operate along certain routes as do the 333s and the voyagers/pendos/adelantes.

It's fair that the North has to cut it's cloth by way of receiving stock cascaded from the South to an extent- revenues are higher in the South so the higher per-capita investment is more justified. Though the fact that the North has some new trains there's still an awful lot of commuters having to put up with sub-standard rolling-stock (and there's not even enough of that to go around!)...

Given the choice I would rather have the 319 refurbished or not! ;)

This. The 319s may well be a little tired out- they've been worked pretty hard for the last 2 decades- but even in their present condition they'd be a massive leap forward on Northern's Liverpool-Manchester services where passengers will at best get a pair of 156s. More often than not it'll be a tatty 150 or worse!
 
Last edited:

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,602
Location
Croydon
What 61653 HTAFC in the last paragraph makes me think of THE point. Its not going to go down well if the 319s remind the folks in the NW of 150s. The least of a refurbishment the 319s get should be to make them nicer than the pacers and early sprinters.

I dont mind what stock goes where. But I am looking forward to Thameslink improving so that I can get on the 09:32 East Croydon to St Pancras rather then being left behind on the platform and even failing to get on the following 09:47. Today I will be pushing in as I am booked on the 10:32 out of Kings Cross to Darlington !. Somewhere round the UK the oldest/horriblest stock then goes to the cutters. Looking forward to the pacers going though I suspect some sprinters might be in a worse state ?.
 
Last edited:

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
And obviously London, the Brighton Main Line and South Eastern Main Line constitute the entire South of England. Meanwhile, down in Devon and Cornwall there are the very same rail buses!....

Then lets not forget that Oxfordshire has new units as does the Chiltern and LTS lines, oh and the Great Eastern and South West Mainlines, in fact, all the mainlines out of London have had new stock at some point since privatisation, with some even being replaced since.

....Taking North as being Birmingham area and up, we have 139, 170, 172, 175, 180, 185, 220, 221, 222, 323, 333, 350s. If we include Scotland we also have 334s, 380s. ....

Birmingham? The north starts at Birmingham? Wow you really have to go some to justify the 'the north gets loads of new stock' argument don't you. Birmingham is The Midlands. Scotland never has been 'the north'.

139s (the only class on the national network to only need 50% fleet availability) are only found in the midlands. 172s barely go north of Birmingham. The 180s may go to destinations in the north, but they are just there for the trips to London (and are basically cascaded stock, originally bought for use in the south).

The TPE 170s were cascaded from the south (and Birmingham in one case). The Liverpool-Norwich service lost it's 170s to 158s so that Crosscountry could have them (and before you say it, Nottingham is hardly the north either). The only places in the north you will see 175s these days is the relatively small triangle of Manchester, Chester and Crewe the rest of the time they are in Wales, granted they were introduced to routes in the north (and Wales), but the DfT made sure that didn't last.

The 220 and 221s are pretty much country wide, whilst the 222s only go as far north as Sheffield (excepting occasional use to Liverpool from Norwich) on their way from London. Unless you include the yet to be delivered 350s there aren't many of those in the north either, just those on the Crewe-Liverpool runs.

I'm surprised you didn't mention the 390s, although they are only 'new to the north' in the same way as the IEP will be, ie, only in so much as they go to and from the north on services from London.

323s? New? If they are new, the 319s are a couple of years old! They haven't been cascaded yet, but then you could say that about the 142s, 144s, 150s, 153s, 155s, 156s, 158s and 321s as well, but I don't think even you would dare class them as new!

You're only really genuine case for new stock in the north is the 185s and the 333s and that's loads compared to the new stock in the south, isn't it?

....Let's also not forget that the north had Sprinters decades before most of the SE had power door stock.

But we can't let reality get in the way ;).

Decades after the Sprinters? Slight exaggeration there. Sprinters were 1985? 313s were 1978? 365s and 165/166s were 1996? Unless the south east is now everything south of Preston Park, that's one decade at most and it's hardly a fair comparison anyway.

How old was the stock they replaced again?
I have forgotten! ;)

And what of the additional stock that didn't replace anything?

Average age of stock in the south that has been replaced? 40? 45? Average age of replaced stock in the north? Have a guess.....
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
and Rail Buses!

and of course there's not much new stock down south is there, well apart from

350, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 444, 450, 458 and to come 377/6, 377/7,
387, 700, 345.

Yet to be fair in the north you've had the 185 along with the 350 and the yet to be ordered TPE stock (its unfair to include stock like the 387, 700 and 345 without including TPE future stock in into the mix). Ah and Merseyrail stock and the 387 could of course go north meaning complaining about them being south is pointless.

Arguing over and over who gets what is pointless as both have old stock and both have new stock. Upgrades are taking place and that should be concentrated on how to improve the services to get more suitable stock on all routes than bickering while leaving out inconvenient facts to our arguments out.
 
Last edited:

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Then lets not forget that Oxfordshire has new units as does the Chiltern and LTS lines, oh and the Great Eastern and South West Mainlines, in fact, all the mainlines out of London have had new stock at some point since privatisation, with some even being replaced since.

What about the Southern half of the ECML? 313s, 317, 321, 365, HSTs and 91+MK4. The Great Eastern received 360s and 379s, yet a vast majority of the fleet is made up of 315, 317 and 321 units. The Chiltern "Clubman" units are by no means new and has only seen a massive 4 172s introduced. Thameslink is in a similar position to the GEML, having only relatively recently received new units with most services being formed of the 319s.

Birmingham? The north starts at Birmingham? Wow you really have to go some to justify the 'the north gets loads of new stock' argument don't you. Birmingham is The Midlands. Scotland never has been 'the north'.

I am comparing like for like. The person I replied to seemed to be under the pretense that "the south" is only London, Sussex and Kent. Even then, Southern also operate 313, 442, 455 and 456 units.

The south of England also includes places such as Somerset, Devon and Cornwall which also see the same out-dated Pacers and Sprinters that are so regularly complained about on this forum by Northern passengers.

As far as I'm aware Scotland is geographically further north than England. But as some posters seem somewhat Anglo-centric, I omitted Scottish units from my original reply.

139s (the only class on the national network to only need 50% fleet availability) are only found in the midlands. 172s barely go north of Birmingham. The 180s may go to destinations in the north, but they are just there for the trips to London (and are basically cascaded stock, originally bought for use in the south).

(and so on and so forth)

This part is quite long and while I won't reply to specifics, the majority of 170/172 (excluding the LO units) do not venture anywhere near London or the rest of the south of England. We could argue about these specifics all day but it would result in massively long posts.

Decades after the Sprinters? Slight exaggeration there. Sprinters were 1985? 313s were 1978? 365s and 165/166s were 1996? Unless the south east is now everything south of Preston Park, that's one decade at most and it's hardly a fair comparison anyway.

Pray tell me, when were the majority of slam doors withdrawn and when were the Sprinters and Pacers produced?

What it comes down to is that the North does get investment which is proportional to the demand. Whether it's liked or not, London and the "South" of England pay a considerable premium for journeys. The investment wasn't free. If various areas of the "North" would like new stock, they are welcome to pay increased premiums for their fares :).
 
Last edited:

Polo Mint

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2013
Messages
96
The Manchester to Liverpool route deserves newer stock than this. If such a high profile route as this is getting scrap then what is the hope for the commuter lines?

I think the bias should be South East vs everyone else. The South East always get preferential treatment because that is where the MP's and the major party donors live. Surely the reason for these 'higher fares' down south is because prices are generally higher everywhere in the South East?

Also rail travel may be more popular in Northern areas if the trains were comfortable and capacity was added.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,666
The Manchester to Liverpool route deserves newer stock than this. If such a high profile route as this is getting scrap then what is the hope for the commuter lines?

I think the bias should be South East vs everyone else. The South East always get preferential treatment because that is where the MP's and the major party donors live. Surely the reason for these 'higher fares' down south is because prices are generally higher everywhere in the South East?

Also rail travel may be more popular in Northern areas if the trains were comfortable and capacity was added.

Why does it? It will have new stock for longer distance TPE services. Local services in the North can not economically support new stock. Infact the regional services struggle.

We wouldn't even have any electrification if we weren't getting second hand units, that is where the business case for NW electrification came from.

Rail travel is already popular, second hand EMUs will provide a far better experience to the DMUs we currently have. And are also longer.
 

W230

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2012
Messages
1,217
The South East always get preferential treatment because that is where the MP's and the major party donors live.
Ah. That old argument. So what exactly do you mean by preferential treatment? Investment in newer trains and large scale infrastructure projects? A more likely explanation is the sheer numbers of commuters heading into London from a large section of the country. You think the 'major party donors' use a cramped rail service to get to work? :lol:

Also rail travel may be more popular in Northern areas if the trains were comfortable and capacity was added.
So instead of making improvements that 'may be' a success, why not make improvements that will be a success?

I agree that London is a leach on much of the country and that services/employment etc etc would be far better distributed about the UK but we have what we have in a capital city that has a massive draw on jobs.

The argument on the North/South (East) divide just seems to go round in circles. They are different markets.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,412
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Just entering this debate as a 68 year old forum member who was only 12 years of age when the first of the Class 304 slam-door stock was delivered to Longsight depot in 1957. In my middle years, I still remember the 4-car units with a small first class (three facing three) section and a corridor-accessed toilet from that area. These units eventually ran as three-car units. Can someone more knowledgeable than I inform me when these last ran in the Manchester area.
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
What about the Southern half of the ECML? 313s, 317, 321, 365, HSTs and 91+MK4....

Aside from the brand new 170s that were replaced by brand new 222s and again replaced by nearly new 180s? Your right there wasn't anything since the 1996 introduced 365s.

....The Great Eastern received 360s and 379s,...

56 four car units (224 vehicles) for one London terminal compared to 67 three or four car units (217 vehicles) in the majority of the north.

....yet a vast majority of the fleet is made up of 315, 317 and 321 units.

And yet the Northern will have to make do with 319s, Pacers and Sprinters for most of it's fleet for years to come.

....The Chiltern "Clubman" units are by no means new....

And yet you saw fit to add older 323s to you post on the north.

..... Thameslink is in a similar position to the GEML, having only relatively recently received new units with most services being formed of the 319s....

The same 319s that are good enough for the north?

....I am comparing like for like. The person I replied to seemed to be under the pretense that "the south" is only London, Sussex and Kent....

So you thought you'd include Birmingham in the north?

.... Even then, Southern also operate 313, 442, 455 and 456 units....

AIUI, the 313s, 456s and 442s will be replaced by 377s when built and/or released from Thameslink.

....The south of England also includes places such as Somerset, Devon and Cornwall which also see the same out-dated Pacers and Sprinters that are so regularly complained about on this forum by Northern passengers....

Devon and Cornwall are the West Country, so is Somerset. Besides which, the south usually refers to the southeast.

....As far as I'm aware Scotland is geographically further north than England. But as some posters seem somewhat Anglo-centric, I omitted Scottish units from my original reply....

The North no more includes Scotland than it does Wales.

....This part is quite long and while I won't reply to specifics, the majority of 170/172 (excluding the LO units) do not venture anywhere near London or the rest of the south of England. We could argue about these specifics all day but it would result in massively long posts....

The majority don't go anywhere near the north either.

....Pray tell me, when were the majority of slam doors withdrawn and when were the Sprinters and Pacers produced?...

The Midland Mainline lost it's local slam door stock in 1987. The Chiltern and Great Western lost theirs around 1994. The 313s were new to the north London lines from new AIUI, so that's 1978ish. The 315s were new to there routes around 1980. 317s replaced 310s out of Euston and 312s out of Kings Cross in 1987 and 1986 respectively, with some heading to LTS. The 310s and 312s that were not withdrawn replaced 302s and 305s on LTS services until replaced by 357s around the turn of the century. A handful saw use on the Great Eastern but were withdrawn when the LTS 317s were displaced. This left the southern region slam door stock.

By the time of privatisation, some slam door stock on the southern region had already been replaced with 159, 442, 455, 456, 465 and 466 units and were joined by a batch of 365 dual voltage units (later going to GN routes). The majority of the remaining slam door stock was progressively withdrawn between 2000 and 2005, leaving just two slam door units on the Lymington Pier branch, which were eventually withdrawn in 2010.

Pacers entered service from 1983 I think, with Sprinters entering service around 1985. The last Sprinters to enter service were the 158s in 1992.

Just for balance, the last slam door stock in the north was replaced in 2003.

....What it comes down to is that the North does get investment which is proportional to the demand. Whether it's liked or not, London and the "South" of England pay a considerable premium for journeys. The investment wasn't free. If various areas of the "North" would like new stock, they are welcome to pay increased premiums for their fares :).

Fares in the south are high because everything in the south costs more, the usual argument is that there is more demand for places, but in any case, because of that the fares covers the cost of newer stock. The north will not get much new stock, not because they can't raise the fares, but because the current fares won't cover them.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
....Can someone more knowledgeable than I inform me when these last ran in the Manchester area.

Replaced by the 323s I think, so 1992?
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,291
Surely its fair to conclude that a good percentage of UK journeys will be made in "the south" that people are referring to, so mainly London and the SE. Also, as a consequence, this part of the country needs a lot of changes and improvements to try and follow the increase in demand. This means that projects often have a tighter specification and need more specialised stock to work with the most benefits, whereas upgrades of the north can use a wider range of stock and therefore newer units then get bought for London and the South East with units cascaded to the north. Thats fair enough really.

It happens all of the time, for example a bus operator that has buses for council and low profit routes that have been run to the ground, new buses won't be bought for them, they'll be sent to the most profitable routes with the buses that are a few years old cascaded down. That never seems to be a problem because everyone really benefits.
 

47802

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
3,454
A comment has been made about the business case for electrification of the north being based on second hand units, indeed but wasn't that also the case for the Thames Valley routes except nobody believes they will get 319's now.

Anyway after opening up a rant about the north south divide maybe should get back to the 319's.


So having had a ride on one of them last week, they really are knackered old junk, if they are to be given a refub along the lines of the 321 demonstrator then I don't think anyone would complain, however one suspects that it will be a lot less than that in reality.
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
Thought the Thames Valley electrification was down to the IC125 fleet was approaching life expires and it made sense to replace them with modern EMUs which come with all the benefits as seen when the line was last upgraded in the 70s so while the main line was electrified the branches would be done too which would make sense.

And I assume you haven't seen this then - http://www.porterbrook.com/downloads/brochures/319 Brochure.pdf
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,412
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
If they are to be given a refub along the lines of the 321 demonstrator then I don't think anyone would complain, however one suspects that it will be a lot less than that in reality.

The highlighted part of your quote above voices the fears of many in the area where these refurbished units appear to be intended to go.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Crikey, it's like the Four Yorkshiremen sketch over here...

I was thinking more in terms of the "Help, help, I'm being oppressed" sketch from "Monty Python and the Holy Grail".
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Thought the Thames Valley electrification was down to the IC125 fleet was approaching life expires and it made sense to replace them with modern EMUs which come with all the benefits as seen when the line was last upgraded in the 70s so while the main line was electrified the branches would be done too which would make sense.

The original plan was more Diesels wasn't it with extend of wiring bring debated fir some time until confirmed.

The highlighted part of your quote above voices the fears of many in the area where these refurbished units appear to be intended to go.

A rather valid fear people are having of simply getting casts off when they were promised better.

The 319 fleet was supposed to have started major refresh work already (the original plan was for the 377/5 fleet to have been gone by now with the 319 fleet already have started withdrawals for major overhaul), as for some looking knackered, that's because some of them are still running around without a refurbishment in recent years.

What surprised me is the units that have been mentioned going from Thameslink internally were units requiring a full refurbishment yet at the same time the TSGN ITT talks about the 319/3 going first. This could mean one of two things, either the units are going straight into service or they are easier for refurbishment with the recent works.

However with talks still on going at last report (they were about three weeks ago), it may be awhile until we know for sure what is actually going on.
 

47802

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
3,454
Thought the Thames Valley electrification was down to the IC125 fleet was approaching life expires and it made sense to replace them with modern EMUs which come with all the benefits as seen when the line was last upgraded in the 70s so while the main line was electrified the branches would be done too which would make sense.

And I assume you haven't seen this then - http://www.porterbrook.com/downloads/brochures/319 Brochure.pdf

I don't recall suburban services to Newbury being worked by HST's, as for the Porterbrook document yes I have seen that, but that's only an example of what could be achieved, it doesn't mean to say it will happen.

What doesn't help the 319's and the 320/321's is that most of them haven't had a really decent refurb since built, and both the interior and overall trains were built to a somewhat dated design in the first place
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top