• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 317 - Onboard Telephone

Status
Not open for further replies.

McDontrains

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2014
Messages
58
Location
London
Evening all,

During my luxurious commute home this evening I noticed the attached sticker - did these units really have a payphone on board, how did they connect to the network on the move?

Many thanks
 

Attachments

  • FullSizeRender.jpg
    FullSizeRender.jpg
    83.1 KB · Views: 371
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Tempest3K

Member
Joined
16 Feb 2015
Messages
158
Location
York
125 Group found some old analogue phone kit in the MK3 RFM when sorting out the kitchen electrics :)
 

McDontrains

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2014
Messages
58
Location
London
Interesting, thanks all. Does anyone have any media of these booths? Only been commuting for 6 years but never come across these before!
 

47271

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2015
Messages
2,983
The very first mobile call I made was from a payphone aboard a brand new 158 (the unit will still have the same seat cushions 24 years later) between Dundee and Aberdeen in 1991.

As I recall the telephone was a standard BT Phonecard unit as fitted to many kiosks at the time, presumably as Neil says with a Vodafone or Cellnet connection of the era - you needed one of those green cards that the phone burned or stamped out units on the topside. The train phone fair shot through the card. It was an expensive chat.

Analogue mobiles were great in rural Scotland - voice coverage still hasn't been bettered even today in my view.

The problem I had with my own analogue mobile a few years later was that someone cloned it when I was using it at Euston one evening. My next bill informed me of repeated lengthy calls to Rochdale, a town I've never been to or know anyone living in. I experienced an enforced upgrade to digital at this point.
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,561
The phones took BT Phonecards and used the BT Cellnet network. I used them a few times and the cost was higher than normal payphones and the signal could be patchy. Some Northern 158s still have the mounting point for the phone at the inner end of the vehicle.
 

Helvellyn

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2009
Messages
2,575
Off the top of my head the following had phones: -

  • Mark 1 Restaurant Buffets (RBRs) used by Intercity Anglia
  • Mark 1 Miniature Buffets (RMBs) used by Intercity CrossCountry
  • Mark 2F First Miniature Buffets (RFBs) used by Intercity CrossCountry
  • Mark 2F Lounge Cars (RLOs) used by Intercity West Coast Sleepers
  • Mark 3 catering vehicles in all HST sets
  • Mark 3 Trailer Firsts (TFs) - one out of two per set used by Intercity Great Western
  • Mark 3B First Opens (FOs) 11083-11101
  • Mark 4 First Opens (FOs) - one out of two per set
  • Class 158 DMUs - one per set
  • Class 159 DMUs - one per set
  • Class 166 DMUs - one per set
  • Class 365 EMUs - one per set
  • Class 442 EMUs - one per set
  • Class 488/2 EMUS - one per set (in the TFOLH)
I also think some Class 309 Clacton EMUs got payphones.

You could tell the Mark 3 TFs and Mark 3B FOs that had a payphone, because the split half-width window behind the normal luggage rack was replaced by a fully frosted glass half-width window (i.e. no metal bar running horizontally across the middle) where the phone booth was.

If I recall, the last four/five digits of the phone number were usually the coach number the phone was located in.
 

gimmea50anyday

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2013
Messages
3,456
Location
Back Cab
You could buy phone cards on the train. On a HST truro bound in 1988 i bought a BR Intercity phone card. It had a picture of a brand new at the time Mk4 DVT and used it on the train to call my mum and dad to tell them what time the train would be in. The card used at a rate of 20p for 10 seconds iirc and the call cost me £1.60 of the £2 card value.

In comparison the hot bacon and tomato roll sold on board with just one meagre piece of bacon and a 5mm thick slice of tomato in a bread bun cost £1.80 if memory serves me rightly
 

CyrusWuff

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
5,460
Location
London
I believe Chiltern's Class 168/0s had a payphone by the Universal toilet when new as well. The entire payphone unit could be removed and replaced with a bike stand or table as well IIRC.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,916
Location
Fenny Stratford
Will the phones on trains not have used the cellnet network as this was part of BT at the time?

You could also make a reverse charges/charge card calls as i doing on one occasion during a long delay to tell the parents i would be late. When the bill arrived i was no popular!
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
If you look closely, you can see the outline of a phone symbol on the carriage end of a 158 (where the 'engaged' light comes on).
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,900
Location
UK
It was indeed Cellnet providing the service, and I think O2 has pretty much the same level of coverage today. ;)
 

gimmea50anyday

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2013
Messages
3,456
Location
Back Cab
Which, on the rail network, is virtually useless because reception is so poor. As a result for work based communications ill either use my own mobile which uses the 3 network, or the GSM-R

Icomera was testing mobile reception across the TPE network on behalf of Stagecoach as they were assessing the network for Wi-Fi fitment. They found EE was the best followed by 3 and confirmed O2 was the poorest. Maybe its about time Worstgroup considered switching allegiance and maybe save a few quid in the process......
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,352
Location
Yorkshire
Which, on the rail network, is virtually useless because reception is so poor. As a result for work based communications ill either use my own mobile which uses the 3 network, or the GSM-R

Icomera was testing mobile reception across the TPE network on behalf of Stagecoach as they were assessing the network for Wi-Fi fitment. They found EE was the best followed by 3 and confirmed O2 was the poorest. Maybe its about time Worstgroup considered switching allegiance and maybe save a few quid in the process......

Hmm... Is this perhaps why I (surprisingly) found I could get good 4G coverage all the way through Standedge Tunnel last week?
 

gimmea50anyday

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2013
Messages
3,456
Location
Back Cab
I have asked this question on here before. Signal is available on the diggle side, almost up to the marsden portal but is lost until the other side of the station. I considered that mobiles were piggy backing off the network rail GSM-R but apparently this is not the case. There hasnt been a definitive answer from anyone yet as to why it works. Nearby morley tunnel unfortunately doesnt have any reception.

Wi-fi hasnt been inplemented yet, its a franchise commitment for the next holder, hence why stagecoach, not First were carrying out the survey although authorisation also came from first. The guy still had to have a train ticket oddly enoigh......
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,322
When considering the signal coverage we have to consider than the phones likely had proper antennas mounted on or near the carriage roof.

Not a tiny printed circuit antenna inside the carriage itself.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,900
Location
UK
As long as the data channel worked to hand off calls, it certainly didn't matter so much if there was interference. 4G is far better than 3G though, especially with cell breathing on 3G making things worse during congested periods (a lot of the time now if you consider the elevated data usage).
 

317666

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2009
Messages
1,775
Location
East Anglia
I'm guessing this is a 317/7 - I believe they had them fitted during their heavy refurbishment for Stansted Express services.
 

McDontrains

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2014
Messages
58
Location
London
I'm guessing this is a 317/7 - I believe they had them fitted during their heavy refurbishment for Stansted Express services.

Must be it, these are ex-WAGN units so makes sense. Surprised TfL haven't removed these non-compliant stickers!
 

Monkey Magic

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2013
Messages
115
I did use one in an HST buffet car back in the day. They ate up your phone card like no ones business, the connection wasn't bad but I seem to recall it being very noisy and difficult to hear.
 

HMS Ark Royal

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2015
Messages
2,798
Location
Hull
If you look closely, you can see the outline of a phone symbol on the carriage end of a 158 (where the 'engaged' light comes on).

I've noticed that myself...!

Some Northern 158s still have the mounting point for the phone at the inner end of the vehicle.

158904 certainly does - I took a Hull-Sheffield service last week as far as Meadowhall and stood in the vestibule for a few moments ahead of arrival as I had to get over to the Huddersfield platforms for my connection. Whilst waiting at a red on the approach, I noticed the mounting point myself complete with sticker residue where one had been
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top