Shaw S Hunter
Established Member
As a young(ish) spotter what struck me most about the 120s was their somewhat rugged appearance thanks to the thick central pillar at the cab ends. This suggestion of heaviness was enhanced by the obvious sluggishness when accelerating from rest: were they somewhat longer geared for their original duties?
By the time I started to see them they had largely been displaced from those original routes, with the exception of the Central Wales Line (as the Heart of Wales Line was then known) and I came to associate them with Crewe-Derby-Lincoln and linked services. IIRC the opposite services more or less crossed at Derby (efficient pathing at Derby's south end) with one of the services using the south end bay. When spotting at Derby this created a nuisance factor as this tended to block the view across the platforms at that end for a period each hour.
As for the asbestos insulation shortening their lives this didn't necessarily apply to all similarly afflicted units. Is it possible that the relatively good interior build quality made remodelling the seating layout while also dealing with the asbestos more expensive than normal?
By the time I started to see them they had largely been displaced from those original routes, with the exception of the Central Wales Line (as the Heart of Wales Line was then known) and I came to associate them with Crewe-Derby-Lincoln and linked services. IIRC the opposite services more or less crossed at Derby (efficient pathing at Derby's south end) with one of the services using the south end bay. When spotting at Derby this created a nuisance factor as this tended to block the view across the platforms at that end for a period each hour.
As for the asbestos insulation shortening their lives this didn't necessarily apply to all similarly afflicted units. Is it possible that the relatively good interior build quality made remodelling the seating layout while also dealing with the asbestos more expensive than normal?