• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Chinese Six wheel arrangement

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eyersey468

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2018
Messages
2,596
Does anyone know how the wheel arrangement of 2 steering axles at the front of a vehicle such as on the Bedford VAL got the name of Chinese Six?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

eastwestdivide

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Messages
3,404
Location
S Yorks, usually
六 is the Chinese for 6, which isn't much help!
Was the arrangement common on Chinese vehicles? As if they'd be common in the UK at that period!
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
12,968
Location
Up the creek
I found an item on the UK Professional Drivers Forum that said it was because the Chinese read from right to left, which is back to front to western eyes (but who are we to cast the first stone at an ancient culture). Having two axles at the front and one at the back looks to be the wrong way round, so the association with Chinese writing. I do not claim that this is definitely the truth, but it is at least plausible.
 

Eyersey468

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2018
Messages
2,596
Found another source which suggests 'Chinese' as a derogatory term for anything back-to-front.
Aah I see, thanks

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I found an item on the UK Professional Drivers Forum that said it was because the Chinese read from right to left, which is back to front to western eyes (but who are we to cast the first stone at an ancient culture). Having two axles at the front and one at the back looks to be the wrong way round, so the association with Chinese writing. I do not claim that this is definitely the truth, but it is at least plausible.
Thanks @Gloster it's certainly plausible
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top