t_star2001uk
Member
- Joined
- 23 Aug 2011
- Messages
- 724
I don't think Chiltern has been the same since it was acquired by Arriva (and of course ultimately DB)
I think you got that round the wrong way. It was DB first....
I don't think Chiltern has been the same since it was acquired by Arriva (and of course ultimately DB)
Fair call, but that's the current ownership structureI think you got that round the wrong way. It was DB first....
Euston never impressed me - the lack of tube station meant a walk in the rain was sometime necessary
I supposed he meant the lack of a Bakerloo station, as he was travelling from Paddington and otherwise only had the Circle at Praed St (as was).The lack of a tube station at Euston??
We will find out in a couple of years when Chiltern comes up for re-franchising. I doubt they will tinker much with it to be honest as it will be running for a few years before HS2 even gets going.
Partly down to the fact Chiltern are paying premiums back now and will quietly cut corners to make sure they can pay those premiums.
I supposed he meant the lack of a Bakerloo station, as he was travelling from Paddington and otherwise only had the Circle at Praed St (as was).
No doubt there's an element of "end of franchise approaching" malaise.
It's an interesting question to speculate as to where Chiltern goes from here. The low-lying and not-quite-so-low-lying fruit has been picked now, in the form of stuffing their short trains with Birmingham and Oxford passengers respectively, with perhaps a bonus in the form of Bicester Village. In the short and medium term the issue is capacity, and in the longer term it will be about holding up the business in the face of competition from HS2 - Chiltern could find itself squeezed if the West Coast franchise also starts competing for the lower-cost London/Birmingham market.