ChiefPlanner
Established Member
While it's true that mineral extraction was the reason for many lines to built in the areas where there were a lot of deposits waiting to be mined or quarried and taken down to the sea for onward transportation, it's correct to say that in rural areas the desire was to join the railway age.
However, I'd say that the transport of produce to markets was still a driving force behind the desire to have a railway, rather than passenger traffic. Meat, milk and vegetables could be transported in a more efficient manner by rail to big cities and towns, as Michael Portillo's programmes have stated on many occasions. It was also useful for inwards goods traffic, as well, naturally, but the rise of road traffic saw a lot of goods move to road haulage.
It was this loss of freight traffic on the Carmarthen to Aberystwtyh route that really killed it. The line to Newcastle Emlyn remained open until 1973 for milk traffic, if my memory serves.
Very much so - as feeders of basics in of coal for local use , fertiliser , bulk foods like flour - (often killing coastal shipping in the process !) - and as you mention meat (Welsh mutton to Smithfield Market being a regular and valued Cambrian traffic) , fish from Neyland and Milford , and of course bulk milk. Most of this does not move very far now - there are no prospects of liquid milk from West Wales to London ever again. I know , I managed the MMB contract for BR wayback - and they had no interest in long haul milk flows. The tankers were duly scrapped....