• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Can PDF timetable in the UK show subminimum connections?

Status
Not open for further replies.

miklcct

Established Member
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
5,017
Location
Cricklewood
I had a bad experience in Sweden today - a missed connection following a PDF timetable from a main line train connecting to a branch line train starting at the transfer station, both shown on the same timetable. Only afterwards I found out that the connection shown didn't satisfy the minimum connection time, the reason why I couldn't reproduce it on the journey planner.

In the UK, some train companies produces timetables which show connections as well, such as South Western Railway. In such case, can such subminimum connections be shown in the PDF?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
24 Jul 2011
Messages
536
Location
Wigan
More often than not (there are exceptions), a timetable will be organised so that it reads chronologically at all the stations shown. As a result, there are examples of arrivals and departures being shown that do not satisfy the minimum connection time, however this is often accompanied by the 'minimum connection time symbol' (a black box with the minimum connection time in minutes in white text), in the stations column.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,744
I had a bad experience in Sweden today - a missed connection following a PDF timetable from a main line train connecting to a branch line train starting at the transfer station, both shown on the same timetable. Only afterwards I found out that the connection shown didn't satisfy the minimum connection time, the reason why I couldn't reproduce it on the journey planner.

In the UK, some train companies produces timetables which show connections as well, such as South Western Railway. In such case, can such subminimum connections be shown in the PDF?
Why is anyone going to show a sub minimum connection? Think about the issues it would cause? Just because you may think you could make it, not everyone can.
 

miklcct

Established Member
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
5,017
Location
Cricklewood
Why is anyone going to show a sub minimum connection? Think about the issues it would cause? Just because you may think you could make it, not everyone can.
I don't know why but it actually happened which I fell foul of it.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,475
Location
Somerset
Why is anyone going to show a sub minimum connection? Think about the issues it would cause? Just because you may think you could make it, not everyone can.
While a PDF timetable shouldn’t display a sub-minimum connection as a connection (ie in italics), it will be shown if both trains form part of the principle service displayed in that timetable (eg changing from faster to slower train at a mid-point).

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

More often than not (there are exceptions), a timetable will be organised so that it reads chronologically at all the stations shown. As a result, there are examples of arrivals and departures being shown that do not satisfy the minimum connection time, however this is often accompanied by the 'minimum connection time symbol' (a black box with the minimum connection time in minutes in white text), in the stations column.
Or chronologically by departure time from origin meaning that trains “starting short” appear in the wrong place (NIR!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top