• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper

Status
Not open for further replies.

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,583
Location
Macclesfield
The Fort William sleeper portion splits from the same train as both the Aberdeen and Inverness portions.
Yes, but what I mean is that the two (Sometimes three) sleeper carriages that make up the Fort William train come from only one half of the Highland sleeper - With each half consisting of a lounge car, seated car and six sleeper cars. The remaining carriages in that half of the sleeper continue on to only one of the other two destinations, I cannot remember which.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,775
A full half train always goes to Inverness- the Fort William portion is split/combined with the Aberdeen portion. This isn't so much about there being greater demand for Inverness- it is simply that that is where the maintenance base is, so each half train goes back there on a cycle, keeping the carriages together so that everything is kept equal.
 

Vicpaul

Member
Joined
22 Oct 2012
Messages
429
Location
Bletchley
There is a lot of talk about refurbishing the MKIIIs but the word on the street when I was working on them was that it was to be new rolling stock.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,583
Location
Macclesfield
A full half train always goes to Inverness- the Fort William portion is split/combined with the Aberdeen portion. This isn't so much about there being greater demand for Inverness- it is simply that that is where the maintenance base is, so each half train goes back there on a cycle, keeping the carriages together so that everything is kept equal.
Thanks for that, you have fully satisfied my curiosity!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
There is a lot of talk about refurbishing the MKIIIs but the word on the street when I was working on them was that it was to be new rolling stock.
That doesn't seem likely when the opening of HS2 (Particularly the second phase) can probably be expected to sound the death knell for the Scottish Sleepers, the Lowland services in particular. At it's most optimistic £100 million would barely cover the cost of an entirely new fleet of rolling stock, whereas it does provide sufficient funding for quite a high quality refurbishment that should serve to spin out the lives of the carriages into the late 2020s.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
31,023
Location
UK
How expensive would it be to build a new train that is essentially a normal train, so perhaps a tag-on order, which has airplane style first-class seats/beds installed instead of regular seats, offered to standard class users, and a few coaches with traditional cabins for first class that cost the real money - but overall is a small part of the overall train configuration?

If the interior is done well, and the carriages are sound-proofed as best as possible, it will provide a perfectly good sleeping environment for people with the benefit of fitting a lot more people in to make it cost effective. People pay top money on a plane, but I'm talking about standard class/economy here.

I'd go with the diagonal seating as used on Virgin Upper Class, with entertainment system (and ideally Internet), power point and storage area (perhaps lockable) for wallet/valuables. Offer passengers an eye cover, earplugs, toothpaste etc - just like the airlines. When not set up in bed mode, each passenger has an ottoman to put feet on, or for a friend to sit at for a conversation.

Perhaps have small area in each carriage for people to stand, as well as the lounge area that offers snacks and drinks. Other food can be taken at the seat, like any other airline food offering.

You can then provide less toilets and have shower facilities at the stations.

The first class cabins can offer the private WC and showers, at a premium price. By all means have a seated coach as well, for even less money.

I'm sure you'd be able to turn a profit if you get more bums on seats/beds.
 

bangor-toad

Member
Joined
20 Feb 2009
Messages
672
How expensive would it be to build a new train that is essentially a normal train, so perhaps a tag-on order, which has airplane style first-class seats/beds installed instead of regular seats, offered to standard class users, and a few coaches with traditional cabins for first class that cost the real money - but overall is a small part of the overall train configuration?

This really does seem like a very sensible way forward.

The pod-style seat used on planes is very well developed and I've been fortunate enough to fly in the expensive seats a few times. There are a number of different types but all of them offer comfort, entertainment and decent sleep.

They are effectively off the shelf components and are easy to source competitively - a nice way to get a good price. It really wouldn't matter what they were installed into. It could be a MK3 shell, a new IEP body shell or anything else without 1/3 & 2/3 doors. I really do see this as a way to get a cost effective sleeper system without the need for vast capital costs.

Of course, such pods are usable as seats. This would allow a far better utilisation of stock. A diagram could be:
Glasgow (late pm) to London (early am)
London (9am) to Manchester / Liverpool / Birmingham as a luxury service
& the return working
London 5pm again to one of the other cities
London (late pm) to Glasgow
(And of course there's the opportunity for some daytime services within Scotland)

This seems to be a far better use of the stock than having it sat unused between 9am and 10pm.

There's the business model - anyone got a few £million to back my tender for the service? :D
Jason
 

ryan125hst

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2011
Messages
1,327
Location
Retford
This really does seem like a very sensible way forward.

The pod-style seat used on planes is very well developed and I've been fortunate enough to fly in the expensive seats a few times. There are a number of different types but all of them offer comfort, entertainment and decent sleep.

They are effectively off the shelf components and are easy to source competitively - a nice way to get a good price. It really wouldn't matter what they were installed into. It could be a MK3 shell, a new IEP body shell or anything else without 1/3 & 2/3 doors. I really do see this as a way to get a cost effective sleeper system without the need for vast capital costs.

Of course, such pods are usable as seats. This would allow a far better utilisation of stock. A diagram could be:
Glasgow (late pm) to London (early am)
London (9am) to Manchester / Liverpool / Birmingham as a luxury service
& the return working
London 5pm again to one of the other cities
London (late pm) to Glasgow
(And of course there's the opportunity for some daytime services within Scotland)

This seems to be a far better use of the stock than having it sat unused between 9am and 10pm.

There's the business model - anyone got a few £million to back my tender for the service? :D
Jason

It's a good idea in priciple, but there will be one thing that will prevent this from happening: Maintainance. Trains that are used during the day will be in the depot overnight to be serviced and for maintainance to be carried out. Sleeper trains are used at night and undergo their maintainance during the day. If they were to run 24/7, when would they be serviced?

Are there any sleeper trains in the world that are used in the day as well? If so, how do they arrange their maintainance?
 

Vicpaul

Member
Joined
22 Oct 2012
Messages
429
Location
Bletchley
Just reiterating what was said

There is a huge chance of it being no more or possibly going in house at the next franchise
 

TomJ93

Member
Joined
24 Apr 2010
Messages
865
Why not run it through more destinations/more stops? It has plenty of time.
 

johnb

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2009
Messages
223
Are there any sleeper trains in the world that are used in the day as well? If so, how do they arrange their maintainance?

Indian Railways - their sleeper trains run for up to three days (I once took this one, although thankfully only for 14 hours of its 41 hour running time), with a fairly rudimentary conversion from "day" to "night". Locos are swapped en route, and presumably maintained to a relatively sensible timescale; coaching stock is inspected and maintained less often...
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
At it's most optimistic £100 million would barely cover the cost of an entirely new fleet of rolling stock, whereas it does provide sufficient funding for quite a high quality refurbishment that should serve to spin out the lives of the carriages into the late 2020s.

Are there still surplus Mk3 sleepers lurking in various places? If so, they'd presumably be less corroded in the toilet regions and so on than the active stock - with a Chiltern-style makeover, another 20+ years should be doable shouldn't it?

I'm more interested to see what'll happen with the lounge cars, although again I guess the sleeper operator will have the pick of the least structurally ruined Mk3s to choose from as the HSTs are progressively retired...
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,775
or for that matter any other super-long distance services. Even the Nightstar cabins had beds designed to fold into seating for day time use/long services
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,583
Location
Macclesfield
Are there still surplus Mk3 sleepers lurking in various places?
The vast majority have now been disposed of. Scotrail have recently acquired one spare sleeper vehicle, the former Cargo-D owned sleeper, Porterbrook have one off-lease sleeper carriage remaining and Arriva now own a further two. There are eight further sleeper carriages at Long Marston that are stored in such a poor condition that they are currently awaiting disposal.

If so, they'd presumably be less corroded in the toilet regions and so on than the active stock - with a Chiltern-style makeover, another 20+ years should be doable shouldn't it?
Given that what spare sleeper carriages there are have, mostly, been out of service for many years and stored in the open air, they probably have far, far greater corrosion problems than the active mark 3 sleepers, and I doubt that it is restricted to the toilet areas.

I'm more interested to see what'll happen with the lounge cars, although again I guess the sleeper operator will have the pick of the least structurally ruined Mk3s to choose from as the HSTs are progressively retired...
Replacing the mark 2 lounge cars with mark 3 vehicles would be interesting, as this would require some sort of reformation of the trains, as there is not another 12 metres of space available to the Caledonian Sleepers within the platform length at Euston to accommodate the additional, longer mark 3 carriages.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,681
Location
Hampshire
Replacing the mark 2 lounge cars with mark 3 vehicles would be interesting, as this would require some sort of reformation of the trains, as there is not another 12 metres of space available to the Caledonian Sleepers within the platform length at Euston to accommodate the additional, longer mark 3 carriages.

That's always been the problem. The Mk2s are getting on abit and one day will need replacing. But, the problem is what with? Spare Mk3s would be good, but there extra length prohibits this, with no extra length availible at any station en route.

As for any future stock, i wonder if Siemens could create something based on a downsized Viaggio Comfort (The stock used on the Railjet services), perhaps with a built in DVT.
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,619
Transport Scotland has published a Contract Notice stating they plan to spend £50-£60 million on the rolling stock not £100 million as was initially suggested. With only £60 million to spend would that rule out any possibility of brand new rolling stock?

http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=APR141981

The notice is for expressions of interest in bidding for the standalone Caledonian Sleeper Franchise, and mentions that TS intend to invest £50-60m, presumably alongside the franchisee who would have a 15 year franchise. Timescales are stated as:

Invitation to Tender: September 13
Successful bidder announced: June 2014
Commencement: April 2015
 
Joined
27 Feb 2007
Messages
276
I know this thread is about the future of the Caledonian Sleeper, but I wonder if someone could answer a quick query about the recent past:

When did the Class 90s take over the Sleeper services? And what liveries did they carry before the current First Scotrail version? I imagine that there may have been a range of liveries from standard DBS to some of the residual BR schemes.

Many thanks for any replies - I did a bit of searching but turned up nothing, and didn't want to start a whole new thread.
 

12CSVT

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2010
Messages
2,611
Class 90s have been hauling Scottish sleepers since they were introduced to passenger traffic in 1988. (Although for several years these duties were shared with class 86 and 87 - also class 85s were still working sleepers almost until the last ones were withdrawn).
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
....And what liveries did they carry before the current First Scotrail version?....

Well, to cut a long list short, pretty much anything the 90s have ever carried except (I think) the green Freightliner liveries (and maybe the grey version), and NXEA and Virgin Trains liveries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top