• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper

miami

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2015
Messages
3,305
Seeing as Cally hasn't put out any sort of celebratory announcement about how much more uptake there's been since serving Birmingham, I don't think it's an especially high amount.

I'm using the Cally next weekend to go from Glasgow down to Birmingham, but honestly it seems like a bit of a waste, as it's scarcely 6 hours worth of sleep when breakfast etc is taken into account. Also, the lack of a lounge at Birmingham Intl is a real mark against.

Next time around, it'll probably be more time-efficient to book the Lowlander, change onto the first northbound service for Birmingham, and arrive at the office after a decent night's sleep. Ideally, there needs to be an option for either a lie-in at Birmingham, or lounge access arranged with AWC.

Surely the more sensible choice would be the 1840 getting into Birmingham at 2307 and going to a hotel.

An hour's trapse to Falkirk (with a post-midnight walk to change station) for the highlander, and on top of that having breakfast on the train, seems somewhat unusual.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Tetragon213

Member
Joined
14 Oct 2024
Messages
675
Location
West Midlands
Surely the more sensible choice would be the 1840 getting into Birmingham at 2307 and going to a hotel.

An hour's trapse to Falkirk (with a post-midnight walk to change station) for the highlander, and on top of that having breakfast on the train, seems somewhat unusual.
The whole point of us doing this is to try and spend as much time as possible with family in Glasgow before I go back home to the West Midlands! The timings on the Birmingham arrival are less than ideal imo, but at least they give us the option at all.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,253
The timings on the Birmingham arrival are less than ideal imo, but at least they give us the option at all.
Passage of the southbound sleeper through the West Midlands continues to be a major challenge for punctuality further south (although those delays aren't always the fault of the sleeper).

In my opinion, it really is a shame they went for a Birmingham International stop rather than Tamworth or Nuneaton, but I can see the marketing attraction of a station with Birmingham in its name.

As the southbound sleeper is now advertised to arrive in London at 0800, even though it is timetabled for 0747, it can generally arrive within 30 minutes of 0800, but it doesn't help the punctuality of other West Coast operators.
 
Last edited:

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,616
Location
Gwynedd
Does anyone know why the calling pattern for the Inverness service is different southbound to northbound?


Northbound it calls at Carrbridge but not southbound.

Southbound it calls at Falkirk Grahamston but not northbound.
 

A S Leib

Established Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
3,244
Does anyone know why the calling pattern for the Inverness service is different southbound to northbound?


Northbound it calls at Carrbridge but not southbound.

Southbound it calls at Falkirk Grahamston but not northbound.
I'm not sure why, but until Covid, the Highlander also called at Watford Junction northbound but not southbound. I don't know when that situation started.
 

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,616
Location
Gwynedd
I'm not sure why, but until Covid, the Highlander also called at Watford Junction northbound but not southbound. I don't know when that situation started.
Yeah the Watford calling was actually a factor in me turning down a job. Well, it was either that or cost, I can't quite remember as it was a few years ago.
 

Tom

Member
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
868
Location
35,000ft
Northbound it calls at Carrbridge but not southbound.
This dates back from ScotRail days, where the sleeper formed part of the commuter operation into Inverness to allow people to travel there from the local area for a pre-9am start. I can't remember the exact year it started, but is the same reason that it has open calls from Kingussie onwards.
 

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,616
Location
Gwynedd
This dates back from ScotRail days, where the sleeper formed part of the commuter operation into Inverness to allow people to travel there from the local area for a pre-9am start. I can't remember the exact year it started, but is the same reason that it has open calls from Kingussie onwards.
That's interesting and makes sense.

It seems short-sighted to me to not offer it in both directions given the often-zero dwelling time, the flex in the timtable, and the opportunities it might open up for new travellers. Though I suppose given their high occupancy rate they're maybe not so concerned about the latter.
 

Tom

Member
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
868
Location
35,000ft
The southbound working runs quite a lot later, so you lose the commuter traffic, and I suspect there would be a pathing issue at Moy with 1H25 if you were to run it earlier. There's also a southbound ScotRail only about 20-25 minutes ahead of it. When the call first started occurring on the northbound, I think it was over an hour (I realise there's one 30 minutes ahead now).

I haven't got the SRTs to hand, but at the moment 1M16 is booked 12 minutes from Slochd to Aviemore. Similar ScotRail services (e.g. a HST) are booked the same. With a Carrbridge call, it's 20 minutes, so you need to find 8 minutes which, with the pass at Moy on 1H25, you don't have to hand.
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,730
I'm not sure why, but until Covid, the Highlander also called at Watford Junction northbound but not southbound. I don't know when that situation started.

Yeah the Watford calling was actually a factor in me turning down a job. Well, it was either that or cost, I can't quite remember as it was a few years ago.
The WFJ (Watford Junction) call on the northbound Highlander definitely continued for a short time after the initial Covid timetable reductions in 2020, as I used the service a lot in summer 2022 when it called at WFJ.

I am fairly certain it was around the December 2022 timetable change when the Highlander stopped serving WFJ.
 

MrEd

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2019
Messages
599
This dates back from ScotRail days, where the sleeper formed part of the commuter operation into Inverness to allow people to travel there from the local area for a pre-9am start. I can't remember the exact year it started, but is the same reason that it has open calls from Kingussie onwards.
I seem to recall the Carrbridge stop northbound was introduced in May 2013, but I could be wrong. Certainly the sleeper was calling there in the last couple of years of being operated by Scotrail. Its scheduled arrival time in Inverness changed from 08:31 to 08:39 at the same time (passing the up Highland Chieftain at Tomatin instead of Moy as previously).
 

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,616
Location
Gwynedd
Do we know if there's been much uptake on services to/from Birmingham since the change?
I've got it booked to get me between two work trips between Coventry and Perth in a few weeks. Taking daytime trains back south after though.
 

Adam0984

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2014
Messages
1,211
Travelling next week Euston to F William, are we able to sit in the seated coach when we get up or have we to stay in our cabin?
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
4,379
You should just be able to have breakfast in the club car - it’s not usually that busy, a surprising (to me) number of people opt for breakfast in their rooms, so there’s almost always space in the club car. It’s the best way of enjoying the scenery. You can’t usually go through to the seated coach.
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,730
Travelling next week Euston to F William, are we able to sit in the seated coach when we get up or have we to stay in our cabin?
If you have booked a room seated coach access is not usually permitted, don't forget people may have reserve empty seats further along the route between Edinburgh and Fort William. However, it may be worth asking if it is really quiet as the worst they can say is no.

You should just be able to have breakfast in the club car - it’s not usually that busy, a surprising (to me) number of people opt for breakfast in their rooms, so there’s almost always space in the club car. It’s the best way of enjoying the scenery. You can’t usually go through to the seated coach.

If a club or double room has been booked then you can have breakfast in the club car, but if a classic room has been booked it is a different menu card which does not have the Club car as an option.

It is still worth asking in the morning as on the Fort William route the club car can range from just a few people to completely full with multiple sittings for breakfast. At this time of year it is usually relatively quiet, but it can just takes a few larger groups to fill the club car.
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,671

I see from the RTT link above that today's Fort William portion has been arbitrarily retimed, presumably to avoid delay repay liabilities. But because of the rubbish way its been done, 1Y11 is timed to take 188.5 minutes to travel the roughly 0.65 miles from Fort William Junction to Fort William, a whopping 0.2mph

Obviously this isn't representative of what happens on the ground, but is it the slowest timed leg of a journey ever?
 

Bill57p9

Member
Joined
1 Dec 2019
Messages
862
Location
Ayrshire

I see from the RTT link above that today's Fort William portion has been arbitrarily retimed, presumably to avoid delay repay liabilities. But because of the rubbish way its been done, 1Y11 is timed to take 188.5 minutes to travel the roughly 0.65 miles from Fort William Junction to Fort William, a whopping 0.2mph

Obviously this isn't representative of what happens on the ground, but is it the slowest timed leg of a journey ever?
And somewhat bizarrely 1Y11 was planned to be overtaken by 1Y41 between Fort William Junction and Fort William.
Winding the arrival time out is nothing new, but by over 3 hours is quite something.
 

nilvaj395

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2025
Messages
217
Location

I see from the RTT link above that today's Fort William portion has been arbitrarily retimed, presumably to avoid delay repay liabilities. But because of the rubbish way its been done, 1Y11 is timed to take 188.5 minutes to travel the roughly 0.65 miles from Fort William Junction to Fort William, a whopping 0.2mph

Obviously this isn't representative of what happens on the ground, but is it the slowest timed leg of a journey ever?
That's extremely cheeky to avoid paying out the delay repay...
 

185143

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
5,331
That's extremely cheeky to avoid paying out the delay repay...
Indeed.

I get the argument of keeping passengers informed about amendments and up to date arrival times and the like.

But retiming it to 13:00, especially in the way they've done it, is blatantly taking the piss.
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,730
Indeed.

I get the argument of keeping passengers informed about amendments and up to date arrival times and the like.

But retiming it to 13:00, especially in the way they've done it, is blatantly taking the piss.
I agree with this, but if this were done to keep passengers informed they should retime all the stops not just the final station where they know the majority of passengers are travelling to.
They could also just inform passengers as they check in about expected delays as this would equally keep them informed but still offer compensation for what is still a late notice change to the service paid for.
For these reasons I genuinely think Caledonian Sleeper only make these sort of amendments to the schedule to avoid paying out.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
8,928
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
I agree with this, but if this were done to keep passengers informed they should retime all the stops not just the final station where they know the majority of passengers are travelling to.
They could also just inform passengers as they check in about expected delays as this would equally keep them informed but still offer compensation for what is still a late notice change to the service paid for.
For these reasons I genuinely think Caledonian Sleeper only make these sort of amendments to the schedule to avoid paying out.
I wonder whether these changes have been driven by the Scottish Government, who subsidise the service to a massive degree and ultimately have to fork out the delay replay money.
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,730
I wonder whether these changes have been driven by the Scottish Government, who subsidise the service to a massive degree and ultimately have to fork out the delay replay money.
This would make sense, although the sleeper is an unusual case where I would rather the delay repay threshold be lowered to say 1 hour instead of these late notice timetable amendments.

It would be interesting to know if late notice changes like this used to occur to the same extent before the sleeper came under Scottish Government ownership in 2023.
 

Buzby

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2023
Messages
1,651
Location
Glasgow, Scotland
I wonder whether these changes have been driven by the Scottish Government, who subsidise the service
Perhaps so - however, I think this sharp practice has been dreamed up to keep the bottom line from looking worse to their paymasters. I travelled once on CS when it was run by Serco and was unimpressed with the value for money, and looking at their 2026 fares, this is still the case. I imagine their summer loadings are 90% tourists who are less influenced by the charge. I do like the look of the new stock, but I’d use other transportation that is better value per mile.
 

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,616
Location
Gwynedd
Perhaps so - however, I think this sharp practice has been dreamed up to keep the bottom line from looking worse to their paymasters. I travelled once on CS when it was run by Serco and was unimpressed with the value for money, and looking at their 2026 fares, this is still the case. I imagine their summer loadings are 90% tourists who are less influenced by the charge. I do like the look of the new stock, but I’d use other transportation that is better value per mile.
I've used it for work with clients in London. When considering the alternatives, they are basically:

1. Go the night before on day time trains and stay in a hotel. The cost of this ends up pretty much the same and involves more time away from home.
2. Fly. But to get to central London for a 9am meeting, this usually means London City Airport, which brings the cost up. Stansted is possible but end-to-end it can be a bit tight on timings. There's also the environmental consideration. I'm sure the low loadings the Sleeper facilitates means it isn't the best, but it'll still be much better than flying.

The CS from Edinburgh gets to Euston at 0715 (actually usually a lot earlier - today was 0620!); that's time to chill on the train and plenty of time to get to a 9am or even 8am meeting.

The other factor when using it for work is the cost is partly recovered through tax. Corporation tax savings for the business, and potentially dividends tax savings etc.

I tend to mainly go Classic, as I'm not really fussed about UK railway lounges (in general, not just CS), and I tend to take my own pastries and just buy a coffee somewhere.

It is expensive, and I really wish the UK had more affordable sleeper services, especially to/from Scotland, but I don't think it's extortionate, it's just a luxury offering really.
 

mq90

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2025
Messages
64
Location
London Commuter Belt
service, first stop Wilmslow, on which some passenger’s friends boarded “because all trains stop at Watford”. Sadly, we were delayed by the special stop


I've used it for work with clients in London. When considering the alternatives, they are basically:

1. Go the night before on day time trains and stay in a hotel. The cost of this ends up pretty much the same and involves more time away from home.
2. Fly. But to get to central London for a 9am meeting, this usually means London City Airport, which brings the cost up. Stansted is possible but end-to-end it can be a bit tight on timings. There's also the environmental consideration. I'm sure the low loadings the Sleeper facilitates means it isn't the best, but it'll still be much better than flying.

The CS from Edinburgh gets to Euston at 0715 (actually usually a lot earlier - today was 0620!); that's time to chill on the train and plenty of time to get to a 9am or even 8am meeting.

The other factor when using it for work is the cost is partly recovered through tax. Corporation tax savings for the business, and potentially dividends tax savings etc.

I tend to mainly go Classic, as I'm not really fussed about UK railway lounges (in general, not just CS), and I tend to take my own pastries and just buy a coffee somewhere.

It is expensive, and I really wish the UK had more affordable sleeper services, especially to/from Scotland, but I don't think it's extortionate, it's just a luxury offering really.
I think that's a fair assessment.

I used it on two occasions, one Friday night run to Edinburgh where we had to meet family on the Saturday and I was finishing my shift in central London at 9pm. Admittedly in the seats and not the best night's sleep. But I still held a railcard and paid less than £50 at two weeks notice.

Another one was in a twin room Euston-Crianlarich and then onwards to Oban for the Calmac to Castlebay. I had to cancel twice due to Covid and the price went up by at least 20% on both occasions. The initial price was £170 (two persons travelling), which I thought was more than fair. But I believe you can't find rooms for less than £200 now?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
2. Fly. But to get to central London for a 9am meeting

Realistically though hardly anyone does 9am meetings for people who are travelling a long way. 10:30 would get you there on day trains from most of the UK south of and including the Central Belt (the first day train to London from Edinburgh is slightly later than I thought it was), and most people will be reasonable in response to what is a very reasonable request or not even make the unreasonable request for a 9am meeting for someone with a four hour journey to start with!

If of course you're north of the Central Belt things are different, but most people aren't. That to be fair is why I've always felt the Highlander much more secure in the face of stuff like HS2 and electric aviation than the Lowlander. Like the Night Riviera, the Lowlander is only just a long enough journey to justify a Sleeper.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

8am meeting

I think I've had 8am meetings probably single figures numbers of times in my whole career. Because most London based office workers commute, nobody likes getting in that early (and those that do tend to have a coffee and maybe breakfast in the office before wanting to have meetings). The culture is not like New York.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,362
I think I've had 8am meetings probably single figures numbers of times in my whole career. Because most London based office workers commute, nobody likes getting in that early (and those that do tend to have a coffee and maybe breakfast in the office before wanting to have meetings). The culture is not like New York.
That varies - I know a few colleagues who think nothing of 8:00 meetings.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
That varies - I know a few colleagues who think nothing of 8:00 meetings.

Anyone who does that for someone they know is travelling a long way is just rude, to be honest, and I would probably give them (were they colleagues rather than a customer) a very terse response to the suggestion of it to be honest.
 

enginedin

Member
Joined
15 Dec 2020
Messages
473
Location
UK
10:30 would get you there on day trains from most of the UK south of and including the Central Belt (the first day train to London from Edinburgh is slightly later than I thought it was)
on paper, yes - but if you live in any of the areas of Edinburgh which are affordable for almost anyone with a family then you'll have a 20-30 min taxi journey (or, if you're very lucky, a Night Bus) - so the 0540 train means getting up at 0430 by the time you get ready / leave the house etc. Now, everybody is different, but I absolutely don't function for the day if I get up that early so from Edinburgh, for a morning meeting in London, I would always go down the previous night or on the Sleeper.

I know a few colleagues who think nothing of 8:00 meetings.
my response would be to book 6pm-7pm meetings with them and see if they liked that ;)
 

Top