VTWC traction as well in the early days. Moved to EWS after a whileI'm sure I seem to recall that some VTWC guards or drivers operated the sleeper also, up until the point where ScotRail took over, then again I could be imagining that!
VTWC traction as well in the early days. Moved to EWS after a whileI'm sure I seem to recall that some VTWC guards or drivers operated the sleeper also, up until the point where ScotRail took over, then again I could be imagining that!
Virgin provided the traction and crews under contract, just as EWS/DB Cargo did after that and GB Railfreight do now.VTWC traction as well in the early days. Moved to EWS after a while
Can't answer that one but would the stock just have been part of the InterCity Sleeper fleet and network?Was the Sleeper stock's home depot Wembley before the operations were transferred to Scotrail?
Can't answer that one but would the stock just have been part of the InterCity Sleeper fleet and network?
I'm sure I seem to recall that some VTWC guards or drivers operated the sleeper also, up until the point where ScotRail took over, then again I could be imagining that!
Even up until 2004, it was ScotRail Waverley and Central Conductors who worked it with VWC Polmadie drivers between Edinburgh/Glasgow Central and Carlisle, before handing over to (presumably) VWC Preston crew once over the border and vice versa.That ended in 2004 when ScotRail took over and provided guards for every sleeper service until Serco took over.
Wonder why Serco didn't just continue that arrangement?Not forgetting that the Fort William / Edinburgh (37 then latterly 67) legs were worked by ScotRail Queen St and Fort William drivers, right up until Serco took over.
i assume GBRF offered a better deal/cheaper pricetag as they could make use of there underused 92's and 73'sWonder why Serco didn't just continue that arrangement?
Serco partnered with GBRf as traction provider in their bid - was then up to GBRf how to resource the traction/crews. GBRf already had the Alcans running to Fort William, so had crews and "depots" covering that route - so more sense to utilise/expand that resource than hire it in.Wonder why Serco didn't just continue that arrangement?
That's not really how the Sleeper franchise bids worked - each bidder partnered with a traction provider up front and that was part of the 'package' they put forward. It wasn't a case that Serco won it, then went out looking for who could provide the traction the cheapest.i assume GBRF offered a better deal/cheaper pricetag as they could make use of there underused 92's and 73's
Makes much more sense now, thanks.GBRf already had the Alcans running to Fort William, so had crews and "depots" covering that route - so more sense to utilise/expand that resource than hire it in.
It usually goes in / is booked for P6. Only tends to go in P12 when something is in the way on P6 that probably shouldn’t be there (eg. late running empty units).Viewed 23:50 1S25 Departing Crewe from Platform 12 tonite ,I was quite chuffed seeing it leave on crewe 5 cam as i have never saw it from there before , would this be regular Departure from there ??
Regards Dave54.
Looking on Realtimetrains.co.uk it seems that it was rerouted into Platform 12 for some reason.Viewed 23:50 1S25 Departing Crewe from Platform 12 tonite ,I was quite chuffed seeing it leave on crewe 5 cam as i have never saw it from there before , would this be regular Departure from there ??
Regards Dave54.
The sleeper only fits in 6 & 12, so what is in 11 doesn’t matter (or what’s in 1 & 5 come to that)Looking on Realtimetrains.co.uk it seems that it was rerouted into Platform 12 for some reason.
Realtime Trains - 2117 London Euston to Inverness
Realtime Trains provides live realtime running information for the Great British railway network using open data.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Platform 6 had a late running ECS move in the Platform (Transport for Wales)
Platform 11 had a TfW Chester service due.
I had the sleeper on platform 1 in August 2019 on a Manchester divert. I was in the Inverness seats right at the back. We were so far off the platform it took me a few minutes to work out why we'd stopped! Despite me knowing Crewe station well.The sleeper only fits in 6 & 12, so what is in 11 doesn’t matter (or what’s in 1 & 5 come to that)
The sleeper only fits in 6 & 12, so what is in 11 doesn’t matter (or what’s in 1 & 5 come to that)
It isn't very helpful if it blocks up junctions though. It typically sits at Crewe for a while to fit its slot south of Euston at a time when there are other trains moving.The sleeper can use any through platform at any station because it has ASDO.
Does the ASDO actually work?The sleeper can use any through platform at any station because it has ASDO.
I would have thought that that would be a safety critical failure and so immediately out of service.Does the ASDO actually work?
ASDO doesn't seem to work correctly on other CAF stock (even in manual overide).
I would have thought that that would be a safety critical failure and so immediately out of service.
Certainly if the default/manual override system is faulty then a train should only be stopping at platforms that can fully accommodate the trains length.
All the stations/platforms CS normally use can.
Not strictly true.
DalmuirWhich platform does CS normally call at which doesn't accommodate all the doors?
Which platform does CS normally call at which doesn't accommodate all the doors?
Watford JunctionWhich platform does CS normally call at which doesn't accommodate all the doors?
Falkirk Grahamston, also the up platform at DalwhinnieWhich platform does CS normally call at which doesn't accommodate all the doors?
Have I misunderstood or are you suggesting "grandfather" rights would permit unlocking doors that were not at a platform? On a passenger service in 2019? Really??How did they deal with those in Mk3 days, or did that have grandfather rights to release doors off the platform?