Clansman
Established Member
Quite a rookie error on the shift allocator's part if that was the case. Surprised there was no staff spare in Aberdeen who could've worked it as they sign the Inverness sleeper on Elgin diverts, and also there are lots of guards from staff depots who signed the sleeper under First's operation of the sleeper (Dundee/Inverness/Perth), although I'm not sure if Dundee guards still sign the Sleeper.It was a rostering error, it turned out the booked guard did not sign sleeper stock so another guard was stepped up to cover the job. The Aberdeen sleeper portion is currently worked by Edinburgh guards. The same thing has happened a few times recently.
I can confirm that Perth guards at least will stop signing on the sleeper from June. It makes sense that Serco uses Scotrail guards until their new Mk5s are built. Bare in mind that most of the Scotrail guards who cover the sleeper now first started in the 80s when the loco-hauls were still running.I seem to remember that Serco wanted to get their own guards instead of having to use ScotRail due to cost. That was a fair few months ago now, is the plan for them still to train up guards or are they going to be using ScotRail for the foreseeable future?
Sam
This.They're currently being recruited.
Guards find out in advance when they check the rosters in the staff bothies normally after they sign off at the end of their current shift.Genuine question, not a criticism - why is it only just as the service is due to leave (it appears) they realise the guard booked isn't signed for sleeper stock? Does the guard only find out what they are on when they turn up for work? Fair enough the rostering goes wrong sometimes, but you'd expect someone to notice a little earlier?
Last edited:
