Sarahs_Railway
Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2017
- Messages
- 131
The Sleeper is heavily subsidised by the Scottish and UK governments (via Transport Scotland and DfT - to the tune of several £million per year). It wouldn't be still running if it wasn't. It isn't a straightforward commercial operation - lots of politics/indirect benefits (e.g. tourism) involved.
I'd be interested to know (but don't expect for one minute anyone would reveal on a public forum) the balance between how much Serco are able to improve their profits through the way they run their services, how much of it they have to operate in certain ways and to certain places due to the franchise agreement etc and how much is a case of "they get paid anyway" even if services end up being over-priced and little used?
e.g. What is the scope/incentive for Serco to alter/improve services; manage prices etc and how much of it is a case of "keep running the same service but with shiny new stock, and we (govt) will make up any shortfall"?
It strikes me that this may become a case of "we can charge whatever we want and if no one travels we will still be paid" - a typical result of allowing a government to do anything. However there are business people who currently use this service to make working in London and maintaining and living in a home in Scotland and paying their community chsrge in Scotland etc viable. We arent millionaires or lords of our manors by any measure. We are simply trying to make our work lives worthwhile.
Will we be listened to? Probably not. The fares will go up until only those on paid journeys by either Parliament can afford them.
I find this sad as the staff of the Caley Sleeper are always brilliant. Cannot fault them on anything. Far from it I applaud them and hope that others will do so to to show that the sleeper fills a need
