GraphitProjekt
Member
I'm surprised you went with "we accept theft from supermarkets as the norm" - considering the tone of this forum and the average taxpayer's alliance-esque vibe of the people that post in it. In effect I agree with you that low level day-to-day supermarket theft is as close to a non-crime as you can get considering the rampent profiteering of supermarket industries.Why the fuss, no one is harmed, the metal is recycled which in itself provides employment, we accept theft from supermarkets as a norm and factor in the cost, surely the same should apply here. A friend who works for BT on cabling says that a day off with pay after a cable theft stops work is always welcome, although that will cease in March when he takes an incredibly generous package.
But I'd say stealing railway infrastructure can disrupt potentially thousands of people in their day-to-day activities for basically no reason. Unlike the many people far below the breadline shoplifting essential items because the prices have ballooned rediculously, no one really needs a load of NwR signalling cable bad enough that it warrants thousands of people unable to get where they are going. That's the point for me: metal thievers do not justifiable need copper bad enough compared to the negative social consequence they are causing.
And by the way, that's why broken public transport is a problem - it stops people being able to fulfill their lives as easily and that's what is important - the fact it changes numbers for nameless gigantic organisations is not that relevant in the grand scheme of things. Money is not a resource, time and labour are