• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

c2c Class 357 repaint....

Status
Not open for further replies.

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
They are separate limited liability companies that are 100% owned by NEG. Each company files separate accounts which are available from Companies House.

However for the purposes of group accounts (annual reports, etc), parent companies are allowed to consolidate their subsidiary companies as if they were all the same entity, which NX has chosen to do for its separate rail subsidiaries.

It is unequivocally true that NEG has no legal responsibility towards NXEC's creditors, any more than shareholders in Enron had a legal responsibility to throw in extra money after Enron went bust to bail out its creditors. That's what 'limited liability' means and why it exists.
Didn't that Enron example sort of happen though? The big banks involved in the Enron scandal (RBS and Citigroup to name a couple) have in the last couple of years paid hundreds of millions of dollars to the Enron Creditors Recovery corporation (effectively Enron's assetless shell).

The question, which I'm not sure has been resolved clearly by anyone, is whether there is a legal clause in the NXEA and C2C franchise agreements under which the franchises are void if NXEA and C2C's parent company owns another franchise that defaults. Adonis seemed to think there is; others seem to think there isn't.
Didn't Connex succumb to this a number of years ago?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

johnb

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2009
Messages
223
Didn't that Enron example sort of happen though? The big banks involved in the Enron scandal (RBS and Citigroup to name a couple) have in the last couple of years paid hundreds of millions of dollars to the Enron Creditors Recovery corporation (effectively Enron's assetless shell).

No, that's different: Enron creditors are suing the banks who, through gross negligence at best, allowed the management to commit the fraud they committed. They aren't suing the shareholders.

Didn't Connex succumb to this a number of years ago?

No, the CSE franchise was terminated because Connex South Eastern itself failed to meet the SRA's criteria for financial reporting and general management competence.
 

bengley

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2008
Messages
1,987
It is a very nice livery. When the train was first approaching me I thought it was a Chiltern 168 :/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top