Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
I assume that the guy was fined. He took it well and continued to be polite and apologetic. I hate people putting their feet on seats, but this wasn't a particularly bad example so I thought that a telling off might have been reasonable, but I guess these guys must be following a zero-tolerance policy.
Only the easy targets, eh? Like to see them confront those on the last Southport service out of Central with feet up, beer out and a roll-up half smoked. Seen two of them smoking last night, not wholly off the railway premesis, surely a byelaw breached there lol. :roll:
Technically true, but a couple of the necessity grounds are so wide as to be applicable in any situation, such as "to enable the prompt and effective investigation of the offence" and "to prevent the prosecution of the offence being hindered by your disappearance".
Technically true, but a couple of the necessity grounds are so wide as to be applicable in any situation, such as "to enable the prompt and effective investigation of the offence" and "to prevent the prosecution of the offence being hindered by your disappearance".
Some custody Sergeants won't just take prompt and effective investigation as sufficient grounds for the person to be detained though, not if the Constable can't justify their reasoning.
SOCPA not SOCAP. And im afraid you cannot arrest for anything. Read the legislation if you wish. It clearly states the offence has to be indictable if a person "other than a constable" wishes to make an arrest under certain conditions.
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.