• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bye Law No 18(2) consequence query

Status
Not open for further replies.

JasWig

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2012
Messages
7
yes, I understand the odds are against me. am seeing lawyer next week and will find out how much. seems crazy that for good reasons and a three quid fair I could end up with a crim when much worse offenders don't. we shall see.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JasWig

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2012
Messages
7
I am happy to confirm that FCC decided to withdraw charges prior to trial, and were ordered to pay towards my costs. In my personal opinion this was more to do with the expertise of Gary Edel of Penman Johnson (www.penmanjohnson.com) as the particular merits of this case. (though there were those too!) I believe that the same facts in the hands of another lawyer may well not have secured this outcome. Gary Edel is very experienced in particular in the protocol and method of this kind of case. I recommend that you read his profile and cases. It seems that faced with such a potentially protracted and expensive defence, FCC opted, after argument from Gary Edel, for a cheaper and faster resolution to their prosecution against me, by withdrawal of the prosecution case against me. An Application was made to the Magistrates for my Defence costs, which was granted. But it is hard to put a price on a criminal record, and in my case it could have seriously affected my career. I am more than happy to recommend Gary Edel to any forum users looking for help with a similar problem. My initial consultation was £90.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top