py_megapixel
Established Member
What buses and coaches have a 3+2 seating configuration, given that 2+2 is standard? (I'm aware that a lot of older buses had benches but that's not really what I am thinking of here).
Along with the Highlands too. A few years ago, I ended up on a (cramped) Stagecoach Plaxton B7R with a 3+2 layout from Kyle to Portree (Skye). Not the most comfortable of vehicles!Quite common in Northern Ireland. Otherwise some coaches used on school journeys.
Had the luxery of one of those vehicles on the 34X from Inverness to Aviemore a couple of years back. Slochd summit was an interesting experience for sureAlong with the Highlands too. A few years ago, I ended up on a (cramped) Stagecoach Plaxton B10M with a 3+2 layout from Kyle to Portree (Skye). Not the most comfortable of vehicles!
Along with the Highlands too. A few years ago, I ended up on a (cramped) Stagecoach Plaxton B10M with a 3+2 layout from Kyle to Portree (Skye). Not the most comfortable of vehicles!
Funny enough i’ve just found the photos from that trip - and like you, I too took a Citylink back to Kyle of Localsh as well.Saw the title and came onto mention the above service - the single most uncomfortable trip I've ever taken (thankfully I was on Citylink on the way back) as at 6'3 I was way too tall to sit in a row. Thankfully it was off season and the bus was near enough empty that I could sit almost sideways to get some leg room.
It's not really an easy question to answer when you consider that many vehicles will have been converted to 3+2 in later life. Some operators will specify 3+2 from new, though, and coach builders and dealers can usually accommodate such requests.What buses and coaches have a 3+2 seating configuration, given that 2+2 is standard? (I'm aware that a lot of older buses had benches but that's not really what I am thinking of here).
643-646 (WAO643-6Y) had Alexander TE bodies rather than P-types. They were new as C47F, so must have been up-seated later in life.Back in the 1990s, Stagecoach Ribble had I think 3 P type tigers - I think it was 644 to 646 - which were B63 and came from Cumberland.
Several Dartline coaches have 2+3 seating.What buses and coaches have a 3+2 seating configuration, given that 2+2 is standard? (I'm aware that a lot of older buses had benches but that's not really what I am thinking of here).
They are not very good for older school children, even far too cramped for older 9-11 year old primary school children. We used one regularly for our younger children and I didn’t find it too bad for my class of 6&7 year olds. It was very useful to be able to accommodate two classes of children for visits to museums etc as it reduced the price considerably in comparison to having to book two coaches. There is only so much you can ask parents to contribute and using this type of coach would often make a visit viable whereas otherwise it would be too expensive. I take the point about a few 2+2 seats for adults but to be quite honest as a teacher, I was usually too busy and stressed keeping the children safely supervised to even think about my safety and comfort. Having said all that I have to add that I really hated this type of coach with so many children in such a confined space.Generally school coaches. Personally I think it should be illegal to carry adults in those seats because it is not possible to use the seat belt correctly if you do not properly fit in the seat; they should have a section of 2+2 for e.g. teachers.
They are horrible.The seating on the bus.
The only time I've been on one of these setups and the only time I want to be on one of these setups.
View attachment 110657
Such vehicles are completely unsuitable for that type of work. I don't consider them suitable for school work either - too many people in a box with little to no means of exit in the event of an emergency.They are horrible.
I went on a dartline rail replacement coach a few years ago and it is why I hate dartline.