Local authorities usually only provide home-to-school transport for pupils attending their catchment school or when they have been allocated to a different school (either because their catchment school is full, or because they need specialist provision). Some also provide transport to the nearest faith school as well, although this is discretionary and so fewer councils are offering it these days. Setting school allocations in order to minimise expenditure on transport is unlikely to be in the best interests of educational outcomes!However in urban areas I wonder how many would still exist if the schools were under joined up LA control AND the buses were in school budgets. I feel that you'd suddenly find that it was possible for far more children to go to their nearest school, and that schools would suddenly become far more able to adjust their capacities in order to allow this to happen!
From what I've seen, the service is a lot busier on Mondays (Selby market day) than Fridays.When I used the 1 last month I counted 30 people on the bus leaving Selby with 8 of us travelling to either Market Weighton or Pocklington. Just because you might not use it doesn't mean it isn't useful for others.
It isn't worth the hassle of mucking about with the timetable for the 139 to remove two 30-minute round trips from the schedule for the 6 weeks that the 82/84 is running to Fountains Abbey. The rest of the daily diagram is still needed for the services to other villages so the savings would be negligible and probably less than the admin costs of making the temporary change. If the summer extension to the 82/84 becomes a regular annual thing then it might be different, but not for a one-off.Currently useless are the two Saturday. Monday and Thursday 139 Ripon-Fountain Abbey (and return) workings given the hourly York-Ripon are extended for the summer to Fountains Abbey running 5 minutes in front to the Abbey and 10/20 later from the Abbey than the 139.
Thank you. It’s interesting to hear the background to this, as I wasn’t aware of how the St Nicholas diversion came about. Though it does remind me now of seeing a timetable of a service terminating at ‘The Oaks’.The 36 diversion via St Nicholas at Wade was introduced when the former Eastonways routes that terminated in the village were withdrawn. There were sufficient numbers of passengers - especially from an OAP complex at The Oaks, where Eastonways had terminated - that offering them something to get to and from Margate was worthwhile, bearing in mind that the main road stops are around 600m away. Whether that is still the case post-Covid, I don't know, but it certainly wasn't useless at the time.