johncrossley
Established Member
Australia, developed country now turning to private bus companies and starting a little bit of deregulation.
Does anyone have any more details about this?
Australia, developed country now turning to private bus companies and starting a little bit of deregulation.
Sydney was where it was reported as deregulation.@markymark2000 What was your example of Australian bus deregulation?
Sydney was where it was reported as deregulation.
Sydney was where it was reported as deregulation.
To be specific, the State Transit Authority of New South Wales was fully privatised early last year. Despite the name, since 2017 its entire purpose had been to operate bus services in the Sydney region. The privatisation moves all of Sydney to a tender model, like already used in Melbourne, Adelaide, and Perth, and most easily explained to people in the UK as being akin to London.Sounds like from @Pakenhamtrain that isn't the case. In the past I have occasionally seen bus services being described as deregulated in foreign media when they mean tendered.
Ahh, that's different to how it was being promoted.To be specific, the State Transit Authority of New South Wales was fully privatised early last year. Despite the name, since 2017 its entire purpose had been to operate bus services in the Sydney region. The privatisation moves all of Sydney to a tender model, like already used in Melbourne, Adelaide, and Perth, and most easily explained to people in the UK as being akin to London.
Brisbane and Canberra still have government-operated buses; by Brisbane City Council and the ACT Government respectively.
All of these schemes are organised through multimodal authorities, again like London, and none of it is even remotely near "deregulation" in the British sense.
No worries, Sydney's set-up was admittedly quite unusual, and I can see how "government-owned operator is broken up and handed over to private firms" would gloss as deregulation to somebody who wasn't familiar with the pre-existing tendering arrangements.Ahh, that's different to how it was being promoted.
In which case, I apologise for wrongly saying buses were deregulated as it seems that I was misinformed and when reading up on it, my searches can't have been linking to the right sites.
It was a weird set up in that STA had an exclusive contract to run region 7,8 and 9.To be specific, the State Transit Authority of New South Wales was fully privatised early last year. Despite the name, since 2017 its entire purpose had been to operate bus services in the Sydney region. The privatisation moves all of Sydney to a tender model, like already used in Melbourne, Adelaide, and Perth, and most easily explained to people in the UK as being akin to London.
Brisbane and Canberra still have government-operated buses; by Brisbane City Council and the ACT Government respectively.
All of these schemes are organised through multimodal authorities, again like London, and none of it is even remotely near "deregulation" in the British sense.
Melbourne is even more odd. The only thing that is out to competitive tender is the former MetBus services. Everything else hasn't ever been tendered out. The same operators have operated the same routes in thier area for donkeys. There's even two different contracts. A 7 year one where the operator gets to keep all the vehicles, staff and IP and A 10 year one where they have to.