• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Buizingen 2010 collision report

Status
Not open for further replies.

OwlMan

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2008
Messages
3,206
See quote below

http://deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws.english/News/1.2913843
Judicial authorities want rail companies and train driver summoned

100626801.jpg
Belga

Fri 10/03/2017 - 11:45 MB The Judicial Authorities in Halle-Vilvoorde (Flemish Brabant) wants to issue a summons to the Belgian rail company NMBS, the company responsible for Belgian rail infrastructure Infrabel and a train driver for involuntarily having caused the Buizingen rail disaster. The accident happened more than 7 years ago on 15 February 2010. Two trains collided at the height of the morning rush hour. 19 people were killed and a further 162 people were injured.
With the investigation into the disaster now finally having been completed, the Judicial Authorities want to summon the driver of the Braine-Le-Comte (Hainaut) to Leuven (Flemish Brabant) train that was involved in the crash to appear before the Police Magistrates Court in Halle on charges of negligence in his task of ensuring safety on board his train and on the rail infrastructure.
During the investigation the driver always maintained that the signal he had driven through was green. However, it has transpired that it was red. If found guilty the driver could risk a maximum sentence of up to 5 years in prison and a fine of 3,000 euro.
As well as the driver, the Judicial Authorities want the rail company NMBS and the rail infrastructure Infrabel to appear in court on charges of negligence with regard to their tasks of ensuring the safety of the rail infrastructure and the safety of passengers on board trains. They both risk fines of 600,000 euro each.
Magistrates will decide on 24 April whether the case will come to court. The accident provoked a review of rail safety. Since 1 November 2016 all trains that travel on the Belgian rail network are equipped with an automatic emergency breaking system.
The TBL+ system ensures that a train automatically breaks if it has been driven through a red signal. Trains that are not equipped with thee system are not allowed to use the Belgian rail network.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Quakkerillo

Member
Joined
23 Jan 2015
Messages
553
What I don't understand, is that they're pushing to prosecute, without me hearing anything new. Later on, there had been cases of the exact same signal failing, and randomly switching aspect, which was suspected to be related to passing High-Speed trains, eventually leading to the signal being removed completely.
Since the signal was declared faulty in at least 2, possibly 3, occasions after the incident, it was decided at first the driver was probably not at fault, and returned to be a driver for the NMBS/SCNB.

So, with no further reports or information being released, I'm quite curious why the step to prosecution has been taken.
 

317666

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2009
Messages
1,775
Location
East Anglia
Not sure if it has anything to do with the amount of other recent incidents on NMBS?
 
Last edited:

MarcVD

Established Member
Joined
23 Aug 2016
Messages
1,246
Well safety culture hasn't stepped in yet... Finding a culprit is still everything that counts.

Envoyé de mon GT-I9505 en utilisant Tapatalk
 

gysev

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2016
Messages
167
Location
Belgium
What I don't understand, is that they're pushing to prosecute, without me hearing anything new. Later on, there had been cases of the exact same signal failing, and randomly switching aspect, which was suspected to be related to passing High-Speed trains, eventually leading to the signal being removed completely.
Since the signal was declared faulty in at least 2, possibly 3, occasions after the incident, it was decided at first the driver was probably not at fault, and returned to be a driver for the NMBS/SCNB.

So, with no further reports or information being released, I'm quite curious why the step to prosecution has been taken.

Because the signal was red all the time. There has been a very dirty game that was played by a union to put the blame with the signalling staff. Even today, some drivers still believe those lies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top