• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bugsworth signal box 1867

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
9 Nov 2017
Messages
73
I have been researching the story of a double crash and double runaway between Dove Holes and New Mills in September 1867. A runaway cattle train hit a Manchester to Buxton non-stop express at New Mills. Happily, this had been halted by a timely message to New Mills Goods box from Bugsworth box. The express train was halted, and indeed set in reverse by the driver, protecting all the passengers from what could have been a vastly worse outcome. My question is:

The key signaller who got the message through to New Mills, with perhaps seconds to spare, was in Bugsworth signalbox. I'm looking at he old maps, and there appears to have never been a signalbox next to Bugsworth Station. Indeed, there would have been little reason to have one, as there was no pointwork.
But until there were four tracks with a crossover, there would have been no need for the later box called Bugsworth South Junction, on the Manchester side of the big cutting, ex tunnel, and I can't see one there on any map before the four tracks were built.

But there is a signalbox on older maps at the junction to the siding for Ladypit Coal Mine, as there was pointwork to control there. So I am thinking this must be the box referred to as Bugsworth in the report, and the one that got the message through to New Mills. This makes the getting a warning through in time even more time critical. The signaller had to use the slow 'speaking telegraph' to send a runaway alert to New Mills box which was only a mile away. The runaway would take little more than a minute to reach New Mills Goods box. There is nothing in the record I have found yet, to indicate that Bugsworth had prior warning, ie from Chinley, but this may be the case. But I'd certainly like to pinpoint this box, indeed find a photo of it too.

Likewise the box where a grievous error started the series of tragic events was Peak Forest. Back in 1867, with far less trackwork or limestone facilities, there would have been only one box, likely on or very near the station. Can anyone confirm this?

And even c1900 map of Chapel Station shows the signalbox south of the station, and not on the platform as later happened. Anyone know when this change happened?

Grateful thanks. Anyone is welcome to my writeup.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
3,266
Have you had a look at the official accident report on the Railway Archive website?
 
Joined
9 Nov 2017
Messages
73
Have you had a look at the official accident report on the Railway Archive website?
Yes indeed, that's what started me off on the research. It seems clear that there was only one box at Peak Forest, one at Chapel, Chinley is not mentioned but had to have a box as it had a goods yard, one at Bugsworth (which I believe can only have been the one that controlled the sidings into Ladypit Coalmine, and one at New Mills East Goods.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,205
Is it possible that the signalbox was located in the immediate vicinity of the one-time Bugsworth (Buxworth) station?

A number of contemporary regional newspaper sources (including The "Manchester Times" dated Saturday 14th September 1867) each talk about...

"...It is the duty of the signalman here to detain a coming train until he receives a telegram from the Bugsworth station that the line is clear..."
 
Joined
9 Nov 2017
Messages
73
Is it possible that the signalbox was located in the immediate vicinity of the one-time Bugsworth (Buxworth) station?

A number of contemporary regional newspaper sources (including The "Manchester Times" dated Saturday 14th September 1867) each talk about...

"...It is the duty of the signalman here to detain a coming train until he receives a telegram from the Bugsworth station that the line is clear..."

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Thanks so much. I have just managed to find that the Bugsworth box was indeed the Ladypit one. But I must check all these newspaper stories including Manchester, to try to pull all these things together.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
12,970
Location
Up the creek
I hope I am answering the right question. The 1896 Cheshire sheet XXIX.4/Derbyhire VII7.II. shows a box on the Down side just west of what I presume is Bugsworth station. (Map is in the National Library of Scotland 25” collection, which is viewable on line.)
 
Joined
9 Nov 2017
Messages
73
I hope I am answering the right question. The 1896 Cheshire sheet XXIX.4/Derbyhire VII7.II. shows a box on the Down side just west of what I presume is Bugsworth station. (Map is in the National Library of Scotland 25” collection, which is viewable on line.)
Thanks so much, I'll check that.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,205
Of course, that's just someone's sketch map. An appropriately dated OS map, such as the one suggested upthread by @Gloster (link below - Bugsworth station on the far right side of map) is likely to have more historical credence, although it's always possible that the signal box itself was moved sometime between 1867 and thirty odd years later, and after all the line through the area had only just been re-aligned prior to the 1867 train smash.

 
Joined
9 Nov 2017
Messages
73
Thanks everyone. I have come to the assumption that Bugsworth Station box lasted till the track was quadrupled in 1902-3, when it was replaced by Bugsworth South Junction, situated at the crossovers between the two sets of tracks.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
5,631
Location
Hope Valley
Thanks everyone. I have come to the assumption that Bugsworth Station box lasted till the track was quadrupled in 1902-3, when it was replaced by Bugsworth South Junction, situated at the crossovers between the two sets of tracks.
I think that that's a sound conclusion.

Bugsworth was a most unusual community in that its main activity was built around the Peak Forest Tramway, which interchanged with the Peak Forest Canal just south of the actual village from around 1800. It was the largest 'inland port' in the world by some descriptions. Whilst quite an important interchange the two modes didn't provide passenger services.

When the main line railway came along nearby it obviously justified a passenger station to serve the village but rather oddly didn't seem to have a goods yard or any other interchange. There would have been a telegraph line and it would have been sensible to create a 'block section' at the station (without getting too bogged down on the precise sophistication of the signalling system at any point in time).
 
Joined
9 Nov 2017
Messages
73
I think that that's a sound conclusion.

Bugsworth was a most unusual community in that its main activity was built around the Peak Forest Tramway, which interchanged with the Peak Forest Canal just south of the actual village from around 1800. It was the largest 'inland port' in the world by some descriptions. Whilst quite an important interchange the two modes didn't provide passenger services.

When the main line railway came along nearby it obviously justified a passenger station to serve the village but rather oddly didn't seem to have a goods yard or any other interchange. There would have been a telegraph line and it would have been sensible to create a 'block section' at the station (without getting too bogged down on the precise sophistication of the signalling system at any point in time).
Thanks. Yes, guess that Chinley station being so near, it was not worth building a goods shed, etc. Actually space was probably rather limited there anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top