• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bucks Free Press - Fare Evasion 6K

Status
Not open for further replies.

chief_007

New Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
1
Location
London
Emir Allen was fined almost £6,000 after a Chiltern Railways Fraud Unit investigation exposed his fare-dodging tactics

Mr Allen purchased short tickets between Sudbury and Harrow road to London Marylebone, but he would only buy the correct ticket when he saw revenue protection staff checking tickets on-board the train.

To avoid detection, he used aliases when purchasing tickets...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Jamiescott1

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2019
Messages
1,116
Just came on here to post this.
Thought he was clever by using different aliases and different online retailers to buy tickets. Good work by the chiltern railways fraud team
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,882
Location
West of Andover
To avoid the need to visit that advert infested local newspaper site:

A persistent fare dodger has been slapped with a hefty fine in court after he avoided correct train fares for almost a year.

Emir Allen was fined almost £6,000 after a Chiltern Railways Fraud Unit investigation exposed his fare-dodging tactics.

He admitted avoiding the correct rail fares on 119 occasions between May 2022 and March 2023.

After pleading guilty, the High Wycombe Magistrates’ Court fined him at a hearing on September 6, which he did not attend.

Mr Allen was ordered to pay a fine of £1,885, prosecution costs £185, investigation costs of £750, compensation amounting to £2,964.20 plus a victim surcharge of £188, making the total to pay £5,972.20.

How he was caught


Mr Allen purchased short tickets between Sudbury and Harrow road to London Marylebone, but he would only buy the correct ticket when he saw revenue protection staff checking tickets on-board the train.

This kind of fare evasion takes money of the railway while punishing passengers, who buy correct tickets, Chiltern Railways said.

On more than one occasion after he was stopped and questioned, Mr Allen refused to give his name and address.

READ MORE: Chesham: Tube strike concerns among passengers on Met Line

To avoid detection, he used aliases when purchasing tickets and he withheld personal details from retailers where possible, the investigation revealed.

CCTV footage from different dates eventually confirmed that Mr Allen was indeed the person who had travelled on the days in question.

Despite his best efforts to fly under the radar, further enquiries by the Fraud Unit uncovered a digital data linking Mr Allen to the ticket purchases. He had also requested to have his personal data deleted from his Trainline account in March 2023 – immediately after he was stopped and questioned.

Chiltern Railways principal fraud investigator Asif Ismail said: “This was an extremely complex case, and the defendant went to great lengths to cover his tracks in an attempt to avoid liability for the offences committed.”

“The Chiltern Railways Fraud Unit spent a considerable amount of time, including conducting surveillance, to confirm his details and preparing the case for our prosecuting authority, Transport Investigations, to ensure that this was a watertight case and that it met all the evidential criteria.”

He said fare evasion is “not only deceptive but deeply damaging to the railway” and the company will always go after “the strongest penalties.”

Fare evasion means there is less money available for investment to improve the railway for everyone, Chiltern Railways explained.

Many operators are still receiving subsidies from the taxpayer via the government following the Covid-pandemic recovery, meaning the company has “a responsibility to strongly pursue lost funds,” Chiltern Railways said.
 

dakta

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2008
Messages
577
Nice one :D it really is a problem and it's good to see justice done.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,948
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
It's this kind of wilfully dishonest thing I'd like to see prosecution reserved for. I guess they went RoRA for ease - I'm sure a fraud charge would have stuck for this case had they wanted to.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,822
Location
UK
A rather misleading headline, as usual. Mr Allen wasn't fined £6000. He was fined £1,885; he was ordered to pay costs and compensation which brought the total to just under £6000 but the majority of this was made up of compensation for fares avoided.

The article also doesn't state which station he is alleged to have actually travelled from (it's unclear whether he was short ticketing, donutting, or just not buying a ticket at all until challenged), which makes it difficult to establish the basis on which the compensation was calculated. It's possible that the defendant here is no (or not mucH) worse off from the perspective of the fares avoided vs the compensation ordered to be paid.

Finally, it's worth noting that the defendant here pled guilty. Had he not done so, it's an open question as to whether he would have been convicted at all, or of all the counts.

As always, train operators like to trumpet these cases to instil fear into passengers and reassure the general public that fare evasion carries consequences. Whilst these sorts of occasions do happen occasionally, they are very much the exception and I have no doubt that there are many who still get away with fare evasion. If the defendant had been legally represented and had appeared at Court, the outcome might have been rather different in any event.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,933
In these cases with wilful and calculating misbehaviour, false details etc he should be doing time in prison. It paints him as a very unpleasant individual who deserves some very unpleasant consequences, and then to make sure that going forward anything that relates to his honesty or otherwise that can impact others is held under the spotlight - he obviously can't be trusted.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,948
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
In these cases with wilful and calculating misbehaviour, false details etc he should be doing time in prison. It paints him as a very unpleasant individual who deserves some very unpleasant consequences, and then to make sure that going forward anything that relates to his honesty or otherwise that can impact others is held under the spotlight - he obviously can't be trusted.

Certainly he should have been convicted of fraud, not a simple RoRA offence as seems to have been used. I could certainly see the case for a year or two in prison for such a long term calculated piece of dishonesty.
 

MadMarsupial

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2021
Messages
126
Location
High Peak
In the UK white collar crime ( fraud and similar ) committed by wealthy people is always treated very leniently. This isn't just an issue with the railway.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,318
Google his name for a (not) surprise.
If he’s the bloke who comes up with all that LinkedIn stuff about financial governance and responsibility, then hopefully his regulator (if he needs one), will be on the case?
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,704
Location
LBK
If he’s the bloke who comes up with all that LinkedIn stuff about financial governance and responsibility, then hopefully his regulator (if he needs one), will be on the case?
You’d hope so. It’s an unusual name, I’d be surprised if it wasn’t him.
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
3,991
Location
Northampton
Looking at the (easily available) photos of someone with the same name it does seem illogical to create a number of aliases and other subterfuge to conceal oneself but adopt a very distinctive facial appearance. Would be easy to spot....
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,596
Location
Yorkshire
Clearly this individual was not a reader of this forum; had they been, they would have realised this was a very bad idea.

Can you please edit your post as per our forum rules:
  • If referring to an external text-based source, you should put a suitable section of the text in QUOTE tags and provide, as appropriate, details of the source and a relevant comment to promote discussion.
Many thanks in advance :)
 
Last edited:

Statto

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2011
Messages
4,116
Location
At home or at the pub
If he’s the bloke who comes up with all that LinkedIn stuff about financial governance and responsibility, then hopefully his regulator (if he needs one), will be on the case?

Yep, given what happened subsequently to the fare dodger using Stonegate (i know he was fired from his job, wasn't he struck off too), you'd expect the same thing to happen with this one.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,058
Location
Up the creek
Yep, given what happened subsequently to the fare dodger using Stonegate (i know he was fired from his job, wasn't he struck off too), you'd expect the same thing to happen with this one.

He lost his job and was banned (for life?) by the Financial Conduct Authority from working in the financial sector. I think that his case was aggravated by the fact that he did not tell his employers until he heard that the FCA had found out the identity of the mystery man who had settled for £42,000+ and was coming to talk to his employers: as soon as he told them, he was out.
 

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
17,914
Location
0036
He lost his job and was banned (for life?) by the Financial Conduct Authority from working in the financial sector.
He was banned indefinitely; he has the right to apply for the ban to be lifted in the future.
 

Tallguy

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2011
Messages
405
Chiltern (who are my local TOC) seem to be having a crack down on the rampant fare evasion they have suffered from in recent years. But with so many of their stations rarely staffed it’s easy to see how criminals take advantage of Chiltern’s lax attitude.
 

fandroid

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2014
Messages
2,570
Location
Hampshire
There was another bit of publicity recently concerning a group of (unconnected) travellers who ended up in court, and paid a lot more for the privilege, after ignoring penalty fare notices.
 

Momuss97

Member
Joined
10 Jun 2023
Messages
6
Location
Crawley
Lots of anger in the comments.

It could be useful to also consider the root issue - train fares are extortionate.

Spending thousands on commuting, during a cost of living crisis, whilst the service in return is dreadful, will naturally lead people to fare dodging.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,058
Location
Up the creek
Spending thousands on commuting, during a cost of living crisis, whilst the service in return is dreadful, will naturally lead people to fare dodging.

And there you have the problem. People who would never dream of walking out of Tesco with a bottle of milk or driving away from a garage without paying seem to feel their isn’t anything really wrong about trying to get away without paying on the train. There is an element of, “Well, the train is running anyway so I am not causing the operator any loss”, but there is also the feeling that the service is poor (and this dates to long before the strikes) and the prices are diabolical: “If they’re going to produce such a service at such a price, why shouldn’t I fiddle my journeys so that I average a reasonable amount for what I get”.

The government has managed to shift a bit of the blame onto the staff for striking, but plenty of people, without understanding the intricacies of the structure of the industry and the influence of the dead hand of DfT (and the Treasury), do feel that the government is really the one ripping them off. And who really worries about fiddling the government.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,999
Location
UK
Spending thousands on commuting, during a cost of living crisis, whilst the service in return is dreadful, will naturally lead people to fare dodging.

Let them pay the price. I won't be losing any sleep over it.
 

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
6,909
It could be useful to also consider the root issue - train fares are extortionate.

Spending thousands on commuting, during a cost of living crisis, whilst the service in return is dreadful, will naturally lead people to fare dodging.
Hmm.

In the last 6 months you've posted 3 times.

1) Asking someone how they got caught doughnutting
2) Explaining how you wouldn't get caught by giving false details
3) Above - saying fares are extortionate and that people will naturally fare dodge given the service.

Might I be right in guessing you have a motive in reading this section...?
 

Mzzzs

Member
Joined
14 May 2022
Messages
279
Location
London<->Nottingham
People will fare evade even if the price of the ticket is 1 pound so I would argue people will evade fares no matter if the price is high or low
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
5,370
Spending thousands on commuting, during a cost of living crisis, whilst the service in return is dreadful, will naturally lead people to fare dodging.
Many of these people caught in the cost of living crisis seem to have no bother paying for subscription TV, holidays abroad and days in the pub in my observations.
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
3,369
Many of these people caught in the cost of living crisis seem to have no bother paying for subscription TV, holidays abroad and days in the pub in my observations.
And always got the newest iPhone, most expensive trainers and expensive tracksuit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top