Busaholic
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2014
- Messages
- 14,671
There's been no huge leaps but there's been significant increases in frequency.
When it started the routes were:
T1 - 5tph day 2tph eves/Sun Elmers End - Wimbledon
T2 - 5tph day 2tph eves/Sun Beckenham Junction - Croydon
T3 - 8.5tph day 4tph eves/Sun New Addington - Croydon
and now they're
T1 - 4tph day 4tph eves/Sun Elmers End - Croydon
T2 - 6tph day 4tph eves/Sun Beckenham Junction - Croydon
T3 - 8tph day 4tph eves/Sun New Addington - Wimbledon
T4 - 4tph day 0tph eves/Sun Elmers End to Therapia Lane
So capacity has increased by:
Elmers End to Croydon 60% day, 100% eves/Sun
Wimbledon to Croydon 60% day, 100% eves/Sun
(Therapia Lane to Croydon section 140% day)
Beckenham Junction to Croydon 20% day, 100% eves/Sun
And less impressive:
New Addington to Croydon -6% day, 0% eves/Sun.
Yes, capacity increases mirroring passenger increases, thus showing effectiveness of system. Of course, if only Wimbledon Station terminus could be sorted out to hold two trams, a problem that was known about before the first tram ever ran, then a route terminating at Therapia Lane would not be necessary. As it is, surely the Therapia Lane service T4 should be merely shortworking journeys on the T3 thus improving the service to New Addington. I know 'shorts' are anathema to TfL who seem to think passengers are too thick to understand them (on the bus side anyway) despite the wonderful London bus system having been traditionally wedded to the concept, also routes working in sections depending on the time of day.
Keep the spare tph on the Addiscombe lines released from the T4 for if/when the Crystal Palace spur is built.