• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bolton - Salford Crescent Electrification.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ole man

Member
Joined
6 Jul 2011
Messages
739
Location
LEC5
From going off the picture the clearance looks very tight, but it's like all picture's they can be decieving.
We have just run new OLE at Bedford and the last road bridge was to small and lowering the track wasn't a option, so we run a earthed section on OLE, trains now using this section have to use rear pan's, that would'nt be possible at this location.
The only way to find out is take reading's of the tunnel roof, which somebody at Network Rail will have somewhere
 

ole man

Member
Joined
6 Jul 2011
Messages
739
Location
LEC5
Looking at the better picture, the bigger of the tunnels would have no problem at all, was it two track at some time?
The narrower tunnel is the opposite, it looks to tight to have the standard bridge arms most tunnels have.Also apart from having catenary wires up, it must have either Return Conductor wire or Earth wire installed.
Though as previously stated i don't know the height/clearance
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,451
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Looking at the better picture, the bigger of the tunnels would have no problem at all, was it two track at some time?

I had made a posting upon this thread some days ago, when I gave the history of both these two tunnels. The larger one was the original two-track tunnel that was used until the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway decided to build a parallel single bore tunnel in the 1880 period, making both tunnels single track running.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Thank you posting this link which I decided to read in full, finding it extremely well written. I noted that when the graveyard was in need of the approved specialist contractors to disinter the remains, it was the London Necropolis company who did this and I believe that this company had its own railway connections in Victorian times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top