Joseph_Locke
Established Member
A point that should wonderfully concentrate a few minds nearer the time.
Fear not - it is attracting a little debate already ...
A point that should wonderfully concentrate a few minds nearer the time.
On Sunday I had a pork pie made in Yorkshire with bury black pudding in it - talk about a free market economy!
NR has confirmed in the Bolton News subject to financing Bolton will be getting its fifth platform reinstated.
NR has confirmed in the Bolton News subject to financing Bolton will be getting its fifth platform reinstated.
NR has confirmed in the Bolton News subject to financing Bolton will be getting its fifth platform reinstated.
To be somewhat pedantic (am I ever anything else..) would it be better for NR to say that the trackwork adjacent to the platform will be reinstated, as the platform itself in that situation surely was not taken away ?
Well there is/was a way. Bring forward the Wigan - Lostock Jct electrification and it could have happened. OK Chorley residents may get even more ****ed off but it could be done.
Has Lostock Junction to Wigan North West been been confirmed yet? Last time I asked Network Rail about this project, this and the Windermere branch were still being reviewed.
We are currently discussing the output, scope and milestones of a number of additional
projects with DfT. As these requirements are agreed we will seek to change control the
projects into our plan. These projects include:
Ely Soham double tracking;
Syston Stoke gauge enhancements;
Windermere branch electrification;
Wigan Bolton electrification; and
Stratford station (development only).
Line closure for Manchester-Preston line electrification works from 14th December on Sun-Thu nights,
• Lostock Junction to Euxton Junction from 21:35
• Bolton to Lostock Junction from 22:00
• Salford Crescent to Bolton from 22:50
From Friday 3rd to Monday 6th April 2015, there will be a complete closure of the route between Salford Crescent and Euxton Junction (near Preston) and between Bolton and Blackburn to allow the Farnworth bi-directional operation to be commissioned. From April to August there will only be 4 or 5 paths through the tunnels an hour single line working, Northern are working on the plan which will see all services between Manchester and Preston/Wigan be 4 or 6 car lengths. Passengers will be directed onto Wigan via Atherton and Preston via Wigan services.
From a post by WatcherZero on Skyscrapercity on Thursday:
Going off TRUST it looks like all TPE services will be diverted via Chat Moss/Wigan from April. All of the Northern services through Bolton are still showing so it seems they're still deciding what to do with what. I guess an hourly TPE shuttle formed of doubled up 185s running back and forth between Bolton and Manchester all day was too much to hope for.
As for the Northern services, I'd start the Clitheroe service from Bolton. Southport to Manchester Airport can run as a train and run all stops between Wigan and Bolton. Manchester Vic to Preston all stops Bolton to Preston sounds a good idea. Possibly then run a two-hourly service between Hazel Grove and Bolton and with some peak trains extending to Preston and vice versa. You could maybe fit the stops between Salford and Bolton into either the Southport-Airport or the Preston-Victoria services. Otherwise run an hourly bus service between Victoria and Bolton serving the stops.
As for the Northern services, I'd start the Clitheroe service from Bolton.
Does anyone have recourse to the number of daily Monday to Friday direct Clitheroe, Whalley, Langho and Ramsgreave & Wilpshire journeys to and from Manchester Victoria?
According to the Network Rail bods who visited the house yesterday, the work to lengthen the passing loops at Darwen, on the line from Bolton to Blackburn and Clitheroe, is to take place next summer at the same time as the Farnworth Tunnel blockade. That being the case, it seems safe to assume that what trains do actually run on the Clitheroe Line during the Darwen works will be timetabled to terminate at Bolton rather than intrude upon the likely chaos south thereof!
* But since I was at work and the two gentlemen concerned discussed the work with Mrs R, who may have misunderstood, I cannot personally vouch for the verisimilitude of what they were reported to have said!![]()
Work at Darwen is supposed to take place during the Farnworth blockade. I'd guess that for some of this work trains won't be able to run through Darwen, so trains on the Clitheroe line will run only to Blackburn, with buses south thereof(which I don't think can actually get to Entwistle station).
It would then simplify things(IMO) if trains running through Darwen before Farnworth is done terminate at Bolton, so as not to change things part way through the blockade.
The three through platforms at Blackburn are all bi-directional so it shouldn't be a problem.
Indeed a seemingly rare example of joined up thinking!
More than that - the electrical clearance work (and potential platform 5 reinstatement works) at Bolton may also be undertaken during the Farnworth / Darwen Blockade, when it's all nice and quiet ...
Glad you mentioned platform 5 at Bolton. Knowing of all the tasks that are required there to bring this platform face back into full operational status, what time period would you personally attach to those works.
This is the main reason the Tod curve service is planned to run to and from Blackburn: There's nowhere between there and the curve suitable for the service to turn back.
I presume they could not turn back here at Accrington as it looks to be controlled by a ground frame ?. (This looks like extremely grotty track to me, but I know nothing.) See photo : Accrington 158
The facing crossover nearest the camera is controlled by the emergency ground frame; the trailing crossover is signalled and controlled from Preston PSB. (Dunnow why they did it that way though!)
[/I]