mralexn
Member
- Joined
- 2 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 462
So basically in your opinion, What TOC takes the most care and pride in looking after their stations?
Also, what TOC is the worst
Also, what TOC is the worst
Then again Birmingham New Street is managed by Network Rail, and that's very drab and underground!! (although they're refurbishing it aren't they??)
NXEA, sorry, Greater Anglia, have a mixed bunch really. Some stations, Ely being one that stands out for me, are very well kept and the staff seem to take pride in their station. Other stations though, such as a few on the Seven Sisters loop, are absolute dumps quite frankly, with litter/smashed glass/broken signs everywhere.
Manchester Piccadilly, managed by Network Rail, is fabulous! One of the best stations in the country I think!!
Then again Birmingham New Street is managed by Network Rail, and that's very drab and underground!! (although they're refurbishing it aren't they??)
Yes they are.
I don't like VT stations that much; BHI, COV and RUG look grey and desolate.
Chiltern's stations aren't bad although the best are easily MYB and BMO at either end.
Yes, BHM is very much a building site at the moment. Every platform has exposed brickwork and scaffolding on it to some degree, with many temporary walls put up too.
Well ATW certainly don't look after the stations in Shropshire much!
Church Stretton relies on volunteers to keep it tidy and tender the gardens.
Chiltern's station seem nice, as do London Midland's.
Birmingham International seems alright. The concourse looked a little grubby but the platforms weren't bad. Unless they've sorted it out since.
I haven't been to Coventry or Rugby on the train so I haven't seen those stations.
Chiltern's station seem nice, as do London Midland's.
Although grotty at the moment, it's all for a sustainably developed and environmentally friendly place!![]()
Have you been to Dudley Port?![]()
Coventry & Rugby, while functional, if a little dull are normally kept spotless. Standing on the island platform at Rugby post-Christmas on a Thursday mid-afternoon, the place was very quiet indeed, but no litter or debris was to be seen.
Think we're maybe being a bit harsh on some TOCs. Manchester Victoria may have half it's roof missing but that's not down to Norther to sort out
then who is it down to?
Manchester Piccadilly, managed by Network Rail, is fabulous! One of the best stations in the country I think!!
Then again Birmingham New Street is managed by Network Rail, and that's very drab and underground!! (although they're refurbishing it aren't they??)
Have to agree about Piccadilly. St Pancras is very well kept too (though it's apparently jointly mangaged by Network Rail and Eurostar, so where credit for that should go I'm not sure).
Have to feel for them slightly on Birmingham New Street, as when presented with it bar rebuilding the entire station you can't really think of ways to make it too much nicer, you can't get away from the fact it's all underground.
Don't forget Dumfries, which has plethora of "Best Station" awards adorning the booking office wall. And it is quite nice - very olde-worlde, like one you'd see on a heritage line.ScotRail's are quite nice - Wemyss Bay is stunning, as are other like Ayr, Glasgow Queen St (not the Low Level, that's grim, but that's beyond their control), Stirling and to an extent Perth.
I'll think of you when the weather turns **** and you're roasting in the open whereas I'll be in cool BHM shade![]()
It's for Network Rail to sort out - Northern can ask all they want, but they can't do a thing without backing of the DfT and NR.