• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Best looking and ugliest trains

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

8A Rail

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2012
Messages
1,351
Location
Mars
Diesel Loco:
Looker - Class 70
Ugliest - Class 55

Electric loco:
Looker - Class 89
Ugliest - Class 88

DMU:
Looker - Blue Pullman
Ugliest - Class 142

EMU:
Looker - Class 502
Ugliest - Class 506

Steam:
Looker - No 46229 " Duchess of Hamilton" / No 4771 "Green Arrow"
Ugliest - No 6229 "Duchess of Hamilton"

All subjective of course!!! :lol::lol:
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,787
Location
Cambridge
Ugliest: Class 142, 150/1, 156, 165, 166, 168/0, 31x, 365, unrefurbished 373, 374 (only the aggressive looking front), 395 (front), 455, 458/5

Nice: Electrostars, Turbostars, Pendolinos, Refurbished 373, Voyagers believe it or not, Dynamic Lines 180, 458/0, 460 (miss those last two so much)
 

JeremyD

New Member
Joined
20 May 2017
Messages
1
I don't think any multiple units with end gangways look good.

While I like Deltics, I don't think they look good: the class 47 is much more stylish, especially in original two-tone green.

My answers are:

Diesel
Best looker: class 47
Worst looker: class 66

Electric
Best looker: class 91
Worst looker: class 73

Steam
Best lookers: class A4, class A3, and Stirling 8 foot single
Worst lookers: the GWR streamlined King

DMU
Best looker: HST
Worst looker: class 140

EMU
Best looker: class 395
Worst looker: class 302/307
 

mrcheek

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Messages
1,605
Best looking has to be the 1930s GWR Diesel railcar

Check out those curves!!

Ugliest: any EMU with cables all over the front
 

Attachments

  • gwr.jpg
    gwr.jpg
    215.6 KB · Views: 35

Class455

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2016
Messages
1,519
Indeed! Also once more, I'm completely stumped regarding the "vast" differences between a 47 and a 56!!! :lol:

I like the 56's because some of the early ones look like a Southern 455/8 at the front.
 

thenorthern

Established Member
Joined
27 May 2013
Messages
4,711
Diesel Loco:
Best - Class 43 (HST)
Ugliest - Class 57

Electric loco:
Best - Class 91
Ugliest - Class 87

DMU 1st Gen:
Best - Class 116
Ugliest - Class 101

DMU 2nd Gen:
Best - Class 170
Ugliest - Class 153

EMU 1st gen:
Best - Class 303 (best of a bad bunch)
Ugliest - Class 421

EMU 2nd gen:
Best - Class 390
Ugliest - Class 319
 

cjmillsnun

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
3,275
Does a HST count as a DMU?

Technically yes it could, it's a DEMU as they are originally classes 253 and 254 (for two power cars and a rake of Mk3s) and the Mk3 coaches are not standard.

However it has been debated many times and those who say it's two locos between a rake of coaches and those who swear blind it's a DMU will never agree. It is one of those that could be either.
 

700007

Established Member
Joined
6 May 2017
Messages
1,271
Location
Near a bunch of sheds that aren't 66s.
Hmmmmm.........

Best loco: 68/88s definitely are quite the lookers.
Worst loco: Maybe a 56
Best DMU I can agree with a class 180, but I do like the Turbostar facelift that you get on 172/0s and 172/1s as well as the 168/2s.
Worst DMU Probably a 168/0.
Best EMU Any Desiro - 350, 360, 444, 450 and 700
Worst EMU The 332 isn't that pretty outside (inside it's a different story!) and 455/8s and 458/5s.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,171
However it has been debated many times and those who say it's two locos between a rake of coaches and those who swear blind it's a DMU will never agree. It is one of those that could be either.

The fact that the Class 25x classifications were withdrawn are a pretty good clue...
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
7,840
The fact that the Class 25x classifications were withdrawn are a pretty good clue...

The fact that the power cars are numbered as coaching stock is an even better clue!
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
18,898
Location
Devon
The fact that the power cars are numbered as coaching stock is an even better clue!

Then again they also fit perfectly between classes 42 and 44 with their horsepower rating. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top