• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bee Network Service/Route Discussion

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

158756

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
1,628
It is probably Diamond, as a privately owned business, for both (Rosso being owned by Transdev shouldn't qualify but Rotala probably do still in this categorisation) then for LOT 2 add Warrington & probably Huyton has snuck in because their owners have little business in the UK currently so the UK legal entity is still small enough to sit under the SME threshold though I don't think they should qualify as such if you have a foreign owner of that size.

Going by the government's definition of SME (fewer than 250 staff and either turnover less than £44m or balance sheet total less than £38m), Diamond Bus North West has too many staff (341 as of their latest published accounts). Rossendale, Warrington, Huyton and First Manchester all meet those criteria.


Like I said, I can only think it's done on the basis of the entity bidding. First Group is huge. But First Manchester Ltd is not a big operation. If there are 3 SMEs on the list for Lot 2, who can they be? it's a process of deduction.


And this comes down to the whole crux of the "SMEs being driven out by franchising problem". If you're First Manchester and you're owned by a big multi-national, and your subsidiary is being classed as an SME for bidding purposes, then it feels like the definition of SME being used is very wrong. But where does that definition come from?

However, the "ownership considerations" section of the government guidance (section 15c and 27-30 appear to be the relevant parts) appears to suggest you need to consider First, Transdev and Tower Transit as a whole, so as common sense would suggest, none of them are SMEs. The same would also apply to Warrington if you consider the council as the parent company (not 100% sure if that applies where the owner is in the public sector)


So TfGM don't appear to be following these guidelines?

c. Substantially connected - A single person or other enterprise controls more than 50% of the capital or voting rights of the enterprise; or the enterprise controls more than 50% of the voting rights of capital in another enterprise. A substantially connected enterprise will need to reassess the core thresholds in accordance with paragraph 27 below to determine its SME status.
27. Substantially connected enterprise - Where an enterprise is connected, it must consider its own staff, turnover, and total assets figures, plus all of the same metrics from the connected enterprise.

28. Example: Enterprise E owns 60% of Enterprise F. Enterprise E has 1000 staff, £150m in turnover, and £70m balance sheet total. Enterprise F has 100 staff, £20m turnover, and £10m balance sheet total.

29. The figures that must be considered to determine if Enterprise F is an SME are thus:

a. Staff: 100 + 1,000 = 1,100

b. Turnover: £20m + £150m = £170m

c. Total Assets: £10m + £70m = £80m

30. Enterprise F is not an SME because it exceeds the core thresholds for staff numbers and both turnover and balance sheet total figures.
 

Leedsbusman

Member
Joined
9 May 2021
Messages
683
Location
Layton
Going by the government's definition of SME (fewer than 250 staff and either turnover less than £44m or balance sheet total less than £38m), Diamond Bus North West has too many staff (341 as of their latest published accounts). Rossendale, Warrington, Huyton and First Manchester all meet those criteria.
The link provided shows First Manchester, Hutton Travel and Warrington as the SMEs.
 

Dwarfer1979

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2025
Messages
437
Location
Leicester
Well it’s owned by Kelsian through Tower which isn’t a particularly big player.
The bid award lists one bid for lot 1 from an SME and three for lot 2. SME doesn’t not simply equate to family ownership - it’s based on turnover and employees with ‘medium’ having up to 250 employees and up to €50m revenue. Getting three SME bids suggests there is interest from the medium end of sector.
But the only "SME" not part of a major group is Warrington which suggested little to no interest from the actual small/medium sized end of the sector. Kelsian, as a sizeable international group with significant businesses in Australia, Singaport, USA & UK already, specifically bought Huyton Travel to be in a position to access franchising and is in no way genuinely medium sized. Neither are First Manchester as part of one of the biggest bus groups in the country.

Under Industry definitions based on fleet size, different from the legal definitions of turnover & staff numbers designed for more general businesses (buses are very staff heavy & low margin in comparison to similar sized turnover businesses), Warrington isn't quite small (tends to be defined as under 100 vehicles for bus companies) whilst Rotala/Diamond are considered a small group/large operator (as a privately owned business though you could argue they should be considered in the big group sector with the majors like First/Stagecoach/Go-Ahead/Arriva & the multi-national groupings like Kelsian & Transdev)

Since London was the non-deregulation area they wished to emulate, am I to believe that TfGM would not have made in-depth studies into the London operation that concerned matters such as the length of time that franchises were to be let, amongst other associated franchise matters?
Well London very clearly advised them that franchising would be expensive and TfGM's position seemed to just be to say we won't do it the same as London. London did try area tendering, similar to franchising, in their early days and it went very wrong very quickly though those mistakes may have been London Transports as all the winners were LT operating companies and the main driver was reducing costs at the time. When Manchester did start pushing franchising there was a lot of reliance on the success of London as justification but TfGM have not followed any part of the London model and were fairly dismissive of the cost risks that London raised (until relatively recently London was fairly heavily subsidised compared to the rest of the country) based on the fact they didn't intend to follow the London model from pretty early on.
 

johncrossley

Established Member
Joined
30 Mar 2021
Messages
4,373
Location
London
There are plenty of examples of Manchester-style area-wide bus franchising. It is probably more common than London-style route by route tendering. Area wide makes more sense in this case because they wanted to get bids from companies that were not yet operating in the region. Rotala jumped the gun by buying First's Bolton depot thinking it was going to be London-style tendering but when it turned out to be area-wide tendering they realised they made a mistake so joined Stagecoach in legal action against TfGM.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
7,434
Location
Northern England
According to Bus Times Diamond will be operating the new 377 Stockport to Woodford service.


It looks like the xx:30 departures from Stockport are intended to combine with the existing 374, 378 and 379 to provide an even-interval 4 departures per hour towards Davenport for most of the day.

With that in mind I have to wonder why there are 377s at 15:45 and 17:45 - which leave, respectively, 5 minutes before a 378, and 5 minutes after a 379 - rather than 15:30 and 17:30. Perhaps the intention is also to tweak the 378 and 379 times in such a way that this makes more sense.

For most of the day the 377 also manages to be reasonably evenly spaced with the 42B, the other bus to Woodford, between Woodford and Bramhall. In both directions it's roughly a 20min/40min split rather than an even one but this isn't too bad, especially considering these services do go to different places.

Agree the lack of a Sunday service isn't great, but Woodford still has the 42B on Sunday and the 378/379 has only an extremely limited Sunday service in the form of the 378A, so it's perhaps understandable why they have chosen this.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,676
Location
Yorkshire
Great to see a new bus route, but the lack of a Sunday service from scratch is dreadful.
If there had been one, I suspect there would have been a lot of questions from people who currently have an hourly weekday service wondering why they don't deserve a Sunday service.
 

tomoufc

Member
Joined
12 Dec 2014
Messages
358
If there had been one, I suspect there would have been a lot of questions from people who currently have an hourly weekday service wondering why they don't deserve a Sunday service.
Good. Not providing a Sunday service is a policy that went out of date 30 years ago.
 

Statto

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2011
Messages
4,052
Location
At home or at the pub
Are there any plans to set up a Leigh to Liverpool service?
No, no real need for such a service plus that will take too long (the 10 Liverpool-St Helens takes 60 to 70 minutes alone), the old 34 when it was Liverpool-Manchester was more for just serving the Towns along the route (Prescot, St Helens, Earlestown, Newton Le Willows & Leigh) rather than those going end to end when there were much faster options.
 

M60lad

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
1,552
Does anybody know whether there's any changes to any services operated from Oldham Depot coming up next month? I'm sure it was next month that 129 & 415s were changing with 129s going over to either Queens Road or Middleton with 415s staying at Oldham and being converted to double deck operation and re-routed to serve Broadgate, Broadway and Greengate.

I know drivers were pretty sure of it happening next month and some have even mentioned it to passengers in the past.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,385
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Does anybody know whether there's any changes to any services operated from Oldham Depot coming up next month? I'm sure it was next month that 129 & 415s were changing with 129s going over to either Queens Road or Middleton with 415s staying at Oldham and being converted to double deck operation and re-routed to serve Broadgate, Broadway and Greengate.
Did the 415 have once to pass through the low tunnel under the railway line at the former Middleton Junction railway station? Admittledly, it is many years since I have travelled in that area.
 

MCRTransitYT

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2024
Messages
230
Location
Bolton
Does anybody know whether there's any changes to any services operated from Oldham Depot coming up next month? I'm sure it was next month that 129 & 415s were changing with 129s going over to either Queens Road or Middleton with 415s staying at Oldham and being converted to double deck operation and re-routed to serve Broadgate, Broadway and Greengate.

I know drivers were pretty sure of it happening next month and some have even mentioned it to passengers in the past.
The 129 and 415 were moved from Middleton to Oldham as I dont think Enviro100 EVs could fit on the existing route, so Solo SRs and the route was transferred to Oldham.
 

mayneway

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2024
Messages
881
Location
Manchester
The 129 and 415 were moved from Middleton to Oldham as I dont think Enviro100 EVs could fit on the existing route, so Solo SRs and the route was transferred to Oldham.
That’s correct, however both Oldham and Hyde road are supposedly going to be 100% electric by the end of the year meaning operation of the 415/129 needs to either move depot or change route.
In all honestly I’m surprised they want to convert the 415 to double deck as it is a busy well used route.
 

mattyharding

On Moderation
Joined
14 Dec 2024
Messages
199
Location
Stalybridge
That’s correct, however both Oldham and Hyde road are supposedly going to be 100% electric by the end of the year meaning operation of the 415/129 needs to either move depot or change route.
In all honestly I’m surprised they want to convert the 415 to double deck as it is a busy well used route.
Oldham is a bit up in the air as some are saying a few diesels are staying for the 350, 348 etc but the 348 can use EVs and i know because it's my local route and they sometimes use EVs
 

Renown 3B3RA

Member
Joined
31 Dec 2024
Messages
16
Location
North West
Historically the old 377 (pre deregulation) operated that way but now there is no public transport between Dean Row and Wilmslow despite the fact that in the interim much new housing has been built in the area. But with Cheshire East‘s laissez-faire approach to bus services, I’m afraid its probably a non starter.
 

gka472l

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2016
Messages
659
Location
Merseyside
The other issue although not directly route related is where Go North West will operate all these extra vehicles from, as Bolton is nearing capacity, Bolton Nelson Street is for work in Bury and contract schools in North Manchester/Rochdale/Bury and Wigan is due to move to a much smaller site elsewhere in the town within two to three years as Bryn is to be used to expand the South Lancs Industrial Estate. So presume further additional premises will need to be found, wether that is the current Diamond Depot in Bolton or a new site elsewhere that should be interesting. Also what happens to the newish fleet of ADL E200's that Diamond Bus have built up, do these pass to GO North West or go back to the leasing company based on the fact that they aren't electric.

The services under the franchises last time are as follows

Bolton Small - 129,507, 521, 525, 526, 533, 535, 537, 541, 544 and school services 907 and 925
Leigh/Atherton Small - 516, 583, 584, 588, 590, 594, 596, 597 and school service 984 it is also possible that small franchise Wigan East services 126 and 132 could be added into the Leigh/Atherton small franchises. In any case the Wigan small franchises will probably be announced shortly as they commenced at the same time last time.

The E200MMC's are TfGM owned aren't they??? A few have transferred between operators before like a few Metroline ones to GNW.....
 

Simon75

On Moderation
Joined
25 May 2016
Messages
1,498
Historically the old 377 (pre deregulation) operated that way but now there is no public transport between Dean Row and Wilmslow despite the fact that in the interim much new housing has been built in the area. But with Cheshire East‘s laissez-faire approach to bus services, I’m afraid its probably a non starter.
Didn't the 378 extend to Wilmslow and Stagecoach curtailed the service to Grove Lane?
 

MCRTransitYT

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2024
Messages
230
Location
Bolton
The E200MMC's are TfGM owned aren't they??? A few have transferred between operators before like a few Metroline ones to GNW.....
Diamond ones aren't, the press releases from Alexander Dennis said Rotala ordered them, so it's whether Diamond Bus/Rotala want to sell the buses over to Go North West or if they will have to supply a fleet from elsewhere. All these contracts GNW have won are small franchises, therefore the operator must provide fleet and depots

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The press releases from Alexander Dennis said Rotala ordered them
 
Last edited:

WWH44L

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2014
Messages
156
Diamond ones aren't, the press releases from Alexander Dennis said Rotala ordered them, so it's whether Diamond Bus/Rotala want to sell the buses over to Go North West or if they will have to supply a fleet from elsewhere. All these contracts GNW have won are small franchises, therefore the operator must provide fleet and depots

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


according to Simon Dunn at Rotala, they are part of the TfGM RV pool. Quote from the WM Forum.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0285.jpeg
    IMG_0285.jpeg
    265.8 KB · Views: 75

Bungle965

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
2 Jul 2014
Messages
3,372
Location
Calder Valley
TfGM have released their latest service changes.

Buses. But better.

A welcome improvement for some services, certainly in Manchester I'd have liked to have seen the 135 PVR increase and the 59 to have it's reliability looked at.

263 increased to every 15 minutes over current 20 minutes

New 377 as mentioned already

95 Timetable improved on Sunday and evenings to hourly
 

Top