NLC1072
Member
If your lifestyle is causing harm, you need to change your lifestyle. Period.
It's not lifestyle, it's the wealthier usually...
*Edit: Nym got to post first!
Last edited:
If your lifestyle is causing harm, you need to change your lifestyle. Period.
If we're on about PV Cells here, then theres just too much silicon and Gallium Arsenide in them to be viable IMO, indirect solar has more of a future
Seems a bit odd that the ConDems chose this one with which to even things out between rich and poor..
The point was they could have done over the last several decades, as usual economics stopped (and is still stopping) it.
If your lifestyle is causing harm, you need to change your lifestyle. Period.
Sorry was thinking about wave power... whole different kettle of fish, I remember seeing a long jointed cylinder floating on the waters surface and using the waves power to operate the joints and collect power from them IIRC a couple of years back in the paper about it
What about dye-sensitized PV cells or organic polymer solar cells? Both are cheap to make (and also crap, but we're hoping to make them less crap enough that the cheapness outweighs that).
...
Pelamis. They're based not too far from me, and it's something I'm very interested in and have been keeping an eye on.
What about dye-sensitized PV cells or organic polymer solar cells? Both are cheap to make (and also crap, but we're hoping to make them less crap enough that the cheapness outweighs that).
One of the people from my lab bay in first and second years has ended up attached to a research group working on dye sensitised PV cells....
It will be decades until they are cheap enough and good enough to be much use, and at that point they will be so cheap we could literally paper the outsides of buildings with them.
Still would require nuclear for nightime (and industrial loads) though.
What about dye-sensitized PV cells or organic polymer solar cells? Both are cheap to make (and also crap, but we're hoping to make them less crap enough that the cheapness outweighs that).
Pelamis. They're based not too far from me, and it's something I'm very interested in and have been keeping an eye on.
Still would require nuclear for nightime (and industrial loads) though.
unless you can find an economical way to store and release the energy from the cells to make them less light dependant on their output times... otherwise it kind of makes our dependance on fosil fueled power stations all that more permanent, i.e something that can be turned on and off according to demand.
Well dye sensitised PV cells all over buildings would atleast provide a nice easy source for air conditioning loads.
But beyond that I got nothing.
Well, I prefer thinking about technology we have NOW and we know works...
Yeah, I'm not a fan of wave power, makes a lot less sense than the likes of tidal IMO.
And a shed tonne of power electronics for anything to work off them, it's the same problem with any non-synchronous generation method, this includes wind, PV solar, wave, tidal (to a certain extent), etc.
The traditional synchronous turbine systems provide a much 'better' solution for grid connection. Nuclear, Coal, CCGT, OCGT and most bigger Diesel installations.
Such as?
The only viable way to store massess of energy is by water and gravity.
Flywheels would need to be too big and can't run synchronously like dams and pumps can, batteries are stupid, capacitors are more stupid, and the only other thing I can think of uses heat, but that also has an insanely low energy density.
Precisly what I was thinking, it's why I didn't come up with any suggestion because quite simply there is none, yet... a better idea might be to cover buildings with those black water container things on the roofs (excuse the cruedness of this, I have no idea what it's called) that heat water and then the water is used to heat offices etc, would probably be a better use of space than the PV cells on buildings anyway... and reduce electricity usage...
Solar Heating Cells or Solar Heat Exchangers.
And I'm doing really well at the moment, havn't directly called anyone stupid yet or anything... Wonder if anyone in the "Sustainable Living" thread is reading any of this...
One fact has been completely missed by the "greens" and that is when we get the coldest weather conditions with freezing fog, neither solar nor wind power work
Also the local didtribution networks in towns and villages are not designed for 100 % electrical demand, i.e they use a diversity approach with solid fuel, oli and gas supplmenting the heat load which can be over 15 kw alone per house!! Dont beliive me, a few years back the area of Belgarve in Leicester sufffered a serious gas failure for over 3 weeks and residents were given portable electric heaters, resulting in the local grid being shut down. Now with no gas or electric they resorted to portable LPG heaters Add to this the not inconsiderable load of electric car cahrging and you have a major rebuuilding excerside. Not too bad for overhead rural lines, but replacing or doubling up underground power lines in cities and towns with be a mamouth task.