business cases have proven there isnt a significant benefit to reopen the line.
I wonder how many of the existing commuter routes of Kent and Sussex would never be built today if they required a similar "business case" (doubtless coloured by such factors as the replacement of level crossings and the loss of motor fuel tax to the treasury etc).
Quite a few, no doubt. However they are already built.
The overrun was just over an hour. What proportion of the normal service up the Brighton Main line could have gone via a reopened Uckfield line anyway ?
If built to double track, quite a few - those from Brighton, Lewes and Eastbourne certainly. Single track, less so.
I reiterate, If this line were built, it would be well used, and day-to-day, not just for diversions.
Agreed. I'd also like to see a link between what I would call the London-Lewes via Uckfield Line and the Redhill-Tonbridge Line, allowing further diversions. I am pretty sure such a chord did once exist, but only in one direction. I am pretty sure this would allow a decent level of added flexibility.
Of course if the Eridge - Tunbridge Wells line was used, along with the Ashurst - Groombridge chord, there would be all sorts of moves possible. Probably not in the near future though
Cheers,
Jason