Absolutely not. I think it's a dreadful idea.Am I the only one that actually thinks it’s pretty poor value?
Carlisle - Edinburgh/Glasgow. £9-10 for a cheap standard single, £25-30 for a standard premium single, and now about £98 for a first class anytime single (which seems to be all that’s available now this new system has started).
I can’t justify paying 2.5x the price for a slightly more spacious and desirable seat, regardless of the additional convenience.
Yep, now that advances are available you can see their pricing model. It seems greedy, especially as the First Class service doesn't seem to be improving to compensate for the new price hikes.Am I the only one that actually thinks it’s pretty poor value?
Carlisle - Edinburgh/Glasgow. £9-10 for a cheap standard single, £25-30 for a standard premium single, and now about £98 for a first class anytime single (which seems to be all that’s available now this new system has started).
I can’t justify paying 2.5x the price for a slightly more spacious and desirable seat, regardless of the additional convenience.
This sounds very much like what they do in most of Europe in terms of first class pricing and service.Am I right in thinking that I the old BR system for
First Class was that the fare was 1.5x the Standard/Second Class fare but came with no food/drink?
For that you would need to go to the Restaurant or Buffet (and pay for what you consumed) or travel on a Pullman service which cost 1st Class fare plus an additional supplement?
Indeed. That’s certainly been my experience as a seasoned European rail traveller, but hinting that European style practices could come in (or rather return) is a bit of a no-no here!This sounds very much like what they do in most of Europe in terms of first class pricing and service.
I have noticed that previously if I book in advance I used to get a First Class return for roughly £78 with railcard, this time round I got quoted £135 advance return with railcard.I was looking ahead at Journeys from SAD to EUS and it seems to me Standard Premium is the same price Advanced 1st Class used to be roughly.
So effectively the cost of 1st Class has increased to the extent it is almost double the amount prior to the introduction of the new middle option.
Looks like the days of 1st Class cheapo travel has gone on Avanti.
I wonder whether that may backfire on the ToC though.I have noticed that previously if I book in advance I used to get a First Class return for roughly £78 with railcard, this time round I got quoted £135 advance return with railcard.
Looks like they're trying to price out the great unwashed and stuff them in Premium Standard and hope they be happy with it while paying the previous first class price for it.
Premium Standard appears to be poor value for what you're getting, just a......... better seat !
No lounge access, alcohol or food............pointless really.
This also meets my experience – I expect it will start to step up next month when standard premium can be selected at time of booking as opposed to people needing to upgrade on board.I've heard of trains being much busier in 1st than standard premium but this is anecdotal and it's early days yet.
Overall I'd say my main objective when travelling first class is a more comfortable seat, but at all times I want to avoid drunks and people with picnics. Increasingly with seatfrog and similar discounts, first class on some trains has become the decidedly less classy end of the train. If standard premium offers a reasonably effective way of segmenting off the picnicers and drunks then so much the better. Moreover, anything that avoids "fun" auctions and apps just to buy a ticket is a huge improvement.I wonder whether that may backfire on the ToC though.
When First Class passengers realise that they’re being fleeced for tea and biscuits (or even if the full meals service resumes, that’s still a hell
of a mark-up for meals on wheels) they may take the view that going in Standard Premium and bringing a picnic is a better way to do it.
I think quite a few will be doing that, including me. Unless they improve first class significantly then the extra outlay is meaningless.I wonder how many people who would have previously paid for First Class will have decided to "downgrade" to Standard Premium if the only reason they upgraded was for a guaranteed table seat so they could do work on the move.
Overall I'd say my main objective when travelling first class is a more comfortable seat, but at all times I want to avoid drunks and people with picnics. Increasingly with seatfrog and similar discounts, first class on some trains has become the decidedly less classy end of the train. If standard premium offers a reasonably effective way of segmenting off the picnicers and drunks then so much the better. Moreover, anything that avoids "fun" auctions and apps just to buy a ticket is a huge improvement.
But why should it be better?What exactly is wrong with "picnicking" on a decent spread from Marks or similar? It is almost certainly going to be nicer and of higher quality than the freebies.
But why should it be better?
You don't got for tea at The Ritz and take your own jam.
A room at the Hilton no breakfast and a room in a standard clean hotel with breakfast included, I know which one I would choose, a bed is a bed by itself which I wouldn't pay a premium for, sure you get a nice carpet, curtain, exclusive wallpaper etc however a standard hotel will do more for less for same quality.Standard Premium is more like room only at a decent quality business hotel.
A room at the Hilton no breakfast and a room in a standard clean hotel with breakfast included, I know which one I would choose, a bed is a bed by itself which I wouldn't pay a premium for, sure you get a nice carpet, curtain, exclusive wallpaper etc however a standard hotel will do more for less for same quality.
because they’re offering a tiny upgrade to a seat only and pricing it at first class prices. £30 for just a bigger seat is not in anyway good value for most journeys apart from perhaps London to Glasgow - but myself and many others are used to a £12 seatfrog with food and drink included for that, and in comparison £30 for a seat is extortionOne thing I don't get is why people think a product not aimed at them is a bad idea simply because they don't want it. See speedy boarding on flights etc.
I don't know, ask Avanti. But it is - quality and quantity.
Standard premium is never going to be for me for what it costs, I may as well sit in standard.Then Standard Premium is not for you.
One thing I don't get is why people think a product not aimed at them is a bad idea simply because they don't want it. See speedy boarding on flights etc.
because they’re offering a tiny upgrade to a seat only and pricing it at first class prices. £30 for just a bigger seat is not in anyway good value for most journeys apart from perhaps London to Glasgow - but myself and many others are used to a £12 seatfrog with food and drink included for that, and in comparison £30 for a seat is extortion
One thing I don't get is why people think a product not aimed at them is a bad idea simply because they don't want it.
the upgrades start from £15 not £30 dont they? and thats getting nowhere near first class prices - me and the good lady are looking for our trip to london in october and will be wanting to do this as we will be eating with the kids before we leave so no need for free food and drink.
That was BR's Silver Standard and Voyager* model.