• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Avanti "Mandatory Reservations"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Andy Pacer

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2017
Messages
3,501
Location
Leicestershire
This has probably been debated before but I've had a look through some threads and can't find it specifically.

Just been looking back through some old tickets of mine to satisfy my curiosity, I had a super off peak return MKC - EUS on Sat 29 June which is obviously flexible and there are no Saturday usage restrictions.

What has got my attention is the 'mandatory reservation' applied. Presumably in practice this isn't actually mandatory and only assigned because of how the journeys are set up in the industry systems? What I'm getting at is I assume I could have travelled at a different time on the same day if I wanted to? (The only booked train only tickets being Advance?)

Screenshot_20240907_084037_Yahoo Mail.jpg
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,193
Should have been perfectly fine on all other (MKC->EUS) services with Avanti on the Saturday that the ticket was valid on, although you obviously wouldn't have had a seat reservation on any other Avanti service than the 0644.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,594
Location
UK
It's a highly misleading piece of phrasing TBH. What it means is "this train is shown as reservations mandatory in the timetable data and we've given you a reservation for it".

It's still a walk-up ticket and so you can take any train that meets the ticket's time and route restrictions (i.e. any Avanti service that day, as 29 June was a Saturday and the aptly named restriction code MK only applies Mon-Fri).

There are no daytime British trains which are truly reservations compulsory. Several operators including Avanti, LNER, Hull Trains and Grand Central mark their trains as such, having snuck this unhelpful practice in during Covid. Bit if there is space for you to board, you can do so regardless of whether you have a reservation; obviously no guarantee of a seat without a reservation.
 

Andy Pacer

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2017
Messages
3,501
Location
Leicestershire
It's a highly misleading piece of phrasing TBH. What it means is "this train is shown as reservations mandatory in the timetable data and we've given you a reservation for it".

It's still a walk-up ticket and so you can take any train that meets the ticket's time and route restrictions (i.e. any Avanti service that day, as 29 June was a Saturday and the aptly named restriction code MK only applies Mon-Fri).

There are no daytime British trains which are truly reservations compulsory. Several operators including Avanti, LNER, Hull Trains and Grand Central mark their trains as such, having snuck this unhelpful practice in during Covid. Bit if there is space for you to board, you can do so regardless of whether you have a reservation; obviously no guarantee of a seat without a reservation.
Thanks for that added info, much appreciated. I thought it was the case and had recently noticed on Real Time Trains that Avanti services were showing as Reservations Compulsory so assumed it was in some way connected to that.
 

STINT47

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2020
Messages
863
Location
Nottingham
Why not list ot as an optional reservation? Would avoid people believing that they're tied to that specific train
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,594
Location
UK
Why not list ot as an optional reservation? Would avoid people believing that they're tied to that specific train
That would certainly be a lot clearer. If I have time I'll look up the RDG specification, it may be that the industry accreditation rules for retailers require that text if the itinerary contains "reservations mandatory" trains, ignoring the possibility of using such a train with a walk-up ticket.
 

Adam Williams

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2018
Messages
3,518
Location
Warks
That would certainly be a lot clearer. If I have time I'll look up the RDG specification, it may be that the industry accreditation rules for retailers require that text if the itinerary contains "reservations mandatory" trains, ignoring the possibility of using such a train with a walk-up ticket.
I don't think it's as clear cut as that in the spec.

I didn't implement it in the way that the screenshot shows, in any case. I only use that text for Advance tickets (and it got accredited). Anything else is misleading IMO.
 
Last edited:

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,107
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Why not list ot as an optional reservation? Would avoid people believing that they're tied to that specific train

The reason it's done (possibly aside from LNER whose management genuinely seem to want to run a ground level airline) is to allow individual trains to be put on and off sale granularly. If you set reservations recommended then that isn't possible.

It really does need properly fixing.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,193
The reason it's done...

...is to allow individual trains to be put on and off sale granularly. If you set reservations recommended then that isn't possible.
What does that actually mean, in slightly plainer English?
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,638
Location
Burgess Hill
What does that actually mean, in slightly plainer English?
TOCs abuse other features in the railway data to make up for their own lack of future planning or to artificially shape traffic on their services.

If they enforce a reservations to be able to buy a ticket for a service, they can artificially move passengers onto other services by faking them being fully booked, and hence not even allowing flexible tickets to be bought with an itinerary on that service.

Likewise, they can combine these features with the options they can impose in the reservations system to block customers reserving seats (and hence buying tickets) for short hop journeys (or to stop them buying tickets for these short hops on a busy service), like what CrossCountry have done for select services between Birmingham and Wolverhampton to try to force customers onto WMT/TfW services instead.
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,769
TOCs abuse other features in the railway data to make up for their own lack of future planning or to artificially shape traffic on their services.

If they enforce a reservations to be able to buy a ticket for a service, they can artificially move passengers onto other services by faking them being fully booked, and hence not even allowing flexible tickets to be bought with an itinerary on that service.
Go the other way and we will get the "outrage" in the Daily Mail over TOCs selling flexible tickets against an itinerary that they "know" to be fully booked.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,193
If they enforce a reservations to be able to buy a ticket for a service, they can artificially move passengers onto other services by faking them being fully booked, and hence not even allowing flexible tickets to be bought with an itinerary on that service.
Even for end-to-end journeys with 'flexible' tickets? Doesn't that then mean that the train is essentially carting around fresh air for much of its journey?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,107
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Yes, it could very well be.

Due to the very poor way in which Avanti manages it, they do indeed seem to be turning people away while running a lot of services considerably under capacity, particularly 11 car sets which have a lot of unreserved seats.

LNER (for their sins) seem to manage things far better.
 

iht

New Member
Joined
27 Mar 2024
Messages
4
Location
Crewe
It's a highly misleading piece of phrasing TBH. What it means is "this train is shown as reservations mandatory in the timetable data and we've given you a reservation for it".

It's still a walk-up ticket and so you can take any train that meets the ticket's time and route restrictions (i.e. any Avanti service that day, as 29 June was a Saturday and the aptly named restriction code MK only applies Mon-Fri).

There are no daytime British trains which are truly reservations compulsory. Several operators including Avanti, LNER, Hull Trains and Grand Central mark their trains as such, having snuck this unhelpful practice in during Covid. Bit if there is space for you to board, you can do so regardless of whether you have a reservation; obviously no guarantee of a seat without a reservation.
It's a ridiculous rule, on a busy train, people are walking up and down looking for an unreserved seat whilst the people with the reservations for those seats are walking up and down a different train because they aren't on the train they've got reservations for. Meanwhile the old lady who has no concept of advance ticketing and has turned up at the station and paid three hundred quid for her return to Euston can't stay in her seat because it's reserved by a tech savvy student whose paid a tenner. But, we're only 30 years into privatisation so I suppose, like Brexit, the benefits are just round the corner
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,568
It's a ridiculous rule, on a busy train, people are walking up and down looking for an unreserved seat whilst the people with the reservations for those seats are walking up and down a different train because they aren't on the train they've got reservations for. Meanwhile the old lady who has no concept of advance ticketing and has turned up at the station and paid three hundred quid for her return to Euston can't stay in her seat because it's reserved by a tech savvy student whose paid a tenner. But, we're only 30 years into privatisation so I suppose, like Brexit, the benefits are just round the corner
The situation you describe has been around for many years and relates much more to the encouragement to reserve a seat (particularly when booking online) than to mandatory reservations. It is just as likely to occur on CrossCountry or Great Western as on Avanti or LNER.
 

bollocksouwan

New Member
Joined
12 Apr 2024
Messages
1
Location
UK
I have suffered the same problem on Avanti when wanting to purchase off peak tickets. Hence I went onto London Northwestern, and not only were there freely available off peak tickets, there were still some cheaper advance tickets! Avanti shooting themselves in the foot by having a dysfunctional web site.
 

jack31439

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2016
Messages
78
Location
South London
Having a similar issue today where trying to get a train out of Euston this afternoon, 15:30, shows as unavailable. Most ticket sellers simply will not allow that itinerary, whereas I know I can buy a ticket from a machine or office that will allow me to travel on that train. This shouldn't be 'hidden' knowledge and a secret work around, either the tickets are available or they are not.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,107
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Having a similar issue today where trying to get a train out of Euston this afternoon, 15:30, shows as unavailable. Most ticket sellers simply will not allow that itinerary, whereas I know I can buy a ticket from a machine or office that will allow me to travel on that train. This shouldn't be 'hidden' knowledge and a secret work around, either the tickets are available or they are not.

Be careful what you ask for, as the likely outcome isn't removal of the ruse, it's making reservations actually compulsory and enforced. Or the LNER style pricing scheme where unreserved travel is unaffordable (and reserved travel is much more expensive).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top