• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

At risk fleets

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,440
The thread on removal of Castle HSTs made me think about what other fleets are at risk in the near future due to cost cutting.

My guesses are:

LNER 225s - Is there sufficient post pandamic demand to justify more than 80X fleet?
XC HSTs - on day hire therefore cheap to run but a long lease on ex Avanti Voyagers at the right price might appeal.
Chiltern loco hauled - expensive to run
807s - how keen are DfT on introducing a second Liverpool service? Maybe the fleet could be split 50:50 with LNER to partially replace 225s. They are not at risk but if they are transferred they would put other units at risk.
175s - popular but going off lease in a couple of years
155s and 156s - approximately 36 x 158s going off lease in next 2 and a bit years which could replace all 155s and many 158s giving a better impression to passengers.
319s - younger, better EMUs going off lease
769s - unreliable and won't be needed by TfW.
230s - collaspe of Vivarail causing maintenance issues

I am not sufficiently familiar with London and the South East to even guess!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

SuperLuke2334

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2021
Messages
1,898
Location
Welsh Marches
175s are definitely at risk as they aren't really standard or can work in multiple with anything other than within class. I agree they are popular so hopefully they will find a home. 769s definitely at risk, they wont last much longer for TfW, I believe the GwR lease is rumoured to end soon, and I doubt Northern will keep theirs all that long.
 

Thirteen

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2021
Messages
1,888
Location
London
The Bakerloo Line stock realistically has a decade at most left in them but I suspect they'll be replaced by the 2024 stock by the late 2020s or early 2030s.
 

jackot

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2021
Messages
343
Location
Surrey
807s - how keen are DfT on introducing a second Liverpool service? Maybe the fleet could be split 50:50 with LNER to partially replace 225s. They are not at risk but if they are transferred they would put other units at risk.
I can see the 807s working well for LNER - it might be a similar case to what SWT had with the 450s - they ordered too many and some subsequently went to Silverlink/Central - or they could just order them separately. Either way I reckon they would be the most practical option for LNER, simply for the economies of scale associated with operating them alongside their other IETs.

Chiltern loco hauled - expensive to run
Yes, however much I like the Chiltern loco hauled sets I can see they are on the way out. Seeing as they no longer have a classified business zone or catering I can't see why 175s or other DMUs can't do what they already do but with more flexibility likely for less money. I feel like the 175s will find a home, despite being a microfleet, with Chiltern or GWR likely being contenders.

I am not sufficiently familiar with London and the South East to even guess!
As far as London and the SE specifically, I can see the 458s' future becoming uncertain - now they have cut funding for the refurb they will likely go off lease when (or more pessimistically, if) the 701s end up in service, unless by then they decide to restart refurbishing them like was initially planned in a few years. If GWR decide to ditch their 769s I really can't see them ending up anywhere but scrap.

350/2s could also be fit for this thread, with lots of potential uses but also a lot of doubt being cast over their future.
 

joncombe

Member
Joined
6 Nov 2016
Messages
868
Class 458. Being refurbished primarily for use on the fast London to Portsmouth trains. But at the moment these are mostly only hourly now (was twice an hour) so could probably be covered by 444s at least in the short term. Or just stick with 450s as unpopular as they are on that route (and rightly so in my opinion).
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
5,123
Location
County Durham
LNER 225s - Is there sufficient post pandamic demand to justify more than 80X fleet?
Yes there is. LNER are actually carrying more passengers than pre pandemic. But I doubt that’ll stop the DFT!

XC HSTs - on day hire therefore cheap to run but a long lease on ex Avanti Voyagers at the right price might appeal.
I think the opportunity will be taken to get rid of them at the same time as GWR’s HSTs. However I wouldn’t be so sure on any replacement for them. Fewer paired up Voyagers seems more likely.

Chiltern loco hauled - expensive to run
319s - younger, better EMUs going off lease
769s - unreliable and won't be needed by TfW.
These are almost certain to go.

807s - how keen are DfT on introducing a second Liverpool service? Maybe the fleet could be split 50:50 with LNER to partially replace 225s. They are not at risk but if they are transferred they would put other units at risk.
This could be a very good idea actually. Although, despite being almost identical to an 803 and exactly the same dimensions, for some reason they’re not covered by an 80x route clearance. Nothing that couldn’t be resolved though.

Avanti could probably just about manage their wired routes entirely with 390s, so LNER could potentially have all of the 807s.

155s and 156s - approximately 36 x 158s going off lease in next 2 and a bit years which could replace all 155s and many 158s giving a better impression to passengers.
155s maybe being a microfleet, but I doubt any 156s will go apart from the ScotRail ones that are going off lease anyway. 158s aren’t suitable for a lot of the routes they’re already on such as the Tees Valley, which need stock that’s designed for commuters rather than regional expresses.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,789
Location
East Anglia
Wasn’t it announced LNER was at 106% of pre-pandemic travel last month? Having said that, I’d still not want such a small sub-fleet personally.
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,440
I can see the 807s working well for LNER - it might be a similar case to what SWT had with the 450s - they ordered too many and some subsequently went to Silverlink/Central - or they could just order them separately. Either way I reckon they would be the most practical option for LNER, simply for the economies of scale associated with operating them alongside their other IETs.


Yes, however much I like the Chiltern loco hauled sets I can see they are on the way out. Seeing as they no longer have a classified business zone or catering I can't see why 175s or other DMUs can't do what they already do but with more flexibility likely for less money. I feel like the 175s will find a home, despite being a microfleet, with Chiltern or GWR likely being contenders.


As far as London and the SE specifically, I can see the 458s' future becoming uncertain - now they have cut funding for the refurb they will likely go off lease when (or more pessimistically, if) the 701s end up in service, unless by then they decide to restart refurbishing them like was initially planned in a few years. If GWR decide to ditch their 769s I really can't see them ending up anywhere but scrap.

350/2s could also be fit for this thread, with lots of potential uses but also a lot of doubt being cast over their future.

There is a whole thread of speculation on future of 175s. 350/2s could replace 319s. Many lease lengths are not in public domain so its hard to know with these things but logically the general trend will be ditching the oldest most expensive to maintain units. Hopefully there only being three big ROSCOs will allow some early cancellation of leases in return for leases on units about to go off lease that don't have a home.

Yes there is. LNER are actually carrying more passengers than pre pandemic. But I doubt that’ll stop the DFT!

I think the opportunity will be taken to get rid of them at the same time as GWR’s HSTs. However I wouldn’t be so sure on any replacement for them. Fewer paired up Voyagers seems more likely.

These are almost certain to go.

This could be a very good idea actually. Although, despite being almost identical to an 803 and exactly the same dimensions, for some reason they’re not covered by an 80x route clearance. Nothing that couldn’t be resolved though.

Avanti could probably just about manage their wired routes entirely with 390s, so LNER could potentially have all of the 807s.

155s maybe being a microfleet, but I doubt any 156s will go apart from the ScotRail ones that are going off lease anyway. 158s aren’t suitable for a lot of the routes they’re already on such as the Tees Valley, which need stock that’s designed for commuters rather than regional expresses.

To a layman 156s are budget 158s i.e. same family, end door, some tables but no aircon. Some 156 routes are interworked with 158s. There aren't enough 158s going off lease to replace all 156s anyway.

LNERs tender was for 10 x 9 coach units. Avantis 10 x 807s of 7 coaches each would do in the short term. If DfT agrees to fund same capacity then 20 additional coaches could be ordered. I hate to say it about my former town but I am not sure Chester justifies an hourly service anymore. Neither am I sure that the Birmingham - Scotland needs the remaining 807s not allocated to Liverpool. I think they could cope with fewer units than planned but the current 13 x 805s on order + Pendolinos might be a stretch to far.

Giving LNER the current order than is due to be delivered from next year wouldn't rule out 807s for Avanti because another order could be made. However, I can't see Avanti matching or exceeding pre pandemic passenger numbers next year. It could potentially happen in the likely time for a new order i.e. 2-3 years. I am a bit skeptical.

Wasn’t it announced LNER was at 106% of pre-pandemic travel last month? Having said that, I’d still not want such a small sub-fleet personally.

Replacing 807s would rationalise the fleet by replacing 225s with units that are very similar to 801s. If additional coaches were ordered they could interwork with 9 coach 801s. Its highly likely that if LNER tender comes to fruition they will get a Hitachi AT-300 variant anyway.

Does anyone know the lease length of 225 fleet?
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,157
Its highly likely that if LNER tender comes to fruition they will get a Hitachi AT-300 variant anyway.
According to other speculative threads, this is not at all guaranteed.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
The thread on removal of Castle HSTs made me think about what other fleets are at risk in the near future due to cost cutting.

My guesses are:

LNER 225s - Is there sufficient post pandamic demand to justify more than 80X fleet?
XC HSTs - on day hire therefore cheap to run but a long lease on ex Avanti Voyagers at the right price might appeal.
Chiltern loco hauled - expensive to run
807s - how keen are DfT on introducing a second Liverpool service? Maybe the fleet could be split 50:50 with LNER to partially replace 225s. They are not at risk but if they are transferred they would put other units at risk.
175s - popular but going off lease in a couple of years
155s and 156s - approximately 36 x 158s going off lease in next 2 and a bit years which could replace all 155s and many 158s giving a better impression to passengers.
319s - younger, better EMUs going off lease
769s - unreliable and won't be needed by TfW.
230s - collaspe of Vivarail causing maintenance issues

I am not sufficiently familiar with London and the South East to even guess!
LNER 225s - The answer is yes, as DanNCL sys above there is more demand than pre - pandemic.

XC HST's - I a possibility of the Avanti Voyagers going to XC, if there is enough requirement for paired up Voyagers to continue. If the demand is not there and not predicted to be there in say the next 10 - 15 years, then I can the XC existing Voyager fleet replacing them. The other option for replacing the XC HST's is the the EMT class 222 units, which along with the EMT class 180's I would say are also at risk.

Chiltern loco hauled - I can see Chiltern either having EMT class 180's or sharing some of the class 222 fleet with another operator.

807s - I cannot see the 807's going anywhere but Avanti to replace the Voyagers doing services like Euston - Birmingham which is all under the wires, which would replace the need for running diesel trains under the wires on the WCML. Avanti only have 18 Voyagers, there is only 13 class 805 units being built and there is at least 4 services a day with two of those Voyagers coupled together on each service. Now, admittedly it, may seem like a reduction but the IET coaches are longer, so a 7 coach IET would be the same length as to two 5 car Voyagers. If you look at the Avanti services from/to Glasgow Central there is a lot of cancelled services. Many of these cancellations, I believe are with not having the stock available to run these services. So 4 or 5 of the remaining class 807 would fill that gap. You also have to bear in mind that the class 390's are going through a refurbishment program, that will likely take the next 2 years or more. With the class 805 and 807 units, it gives Avanti the ability to have a more than adequate fleet to cover for these class 390 refurbishments and hopefully provide the full service required.

155s/156s/319s - Okay, with regards to Northern 7 class 155, 56 class 156 and 12 class 319 units, I can see these possibly being replaced by either more class 195/331 units being built or possibly a hybrid class 195/331 fleet with either three or four carriages per unit similar to what Greater Anglia have with the class 755 units.

The class 156 units with EMT are being replaced by class 170 units from TFW and Southern. These class 156 units are then transferring to Northern.

171 - This is slowly becoming a micro fleet, with previous units in the fleet being converted back to be class 170 units. As per the future comment on the class 171 wiki page:
As at August 2022, Southern operated 20 sets; 12 two-carriage sets and eight four-carriage sets. In September 2022 the two Class 171/2 and two Class 171/4 sets were reformed back into their original three carriage formations, returned to Eversholt Rail Group and leased to East Midlands Railway (EMR). Three moved to EMR where they will be converted back to Class 170s while the fourth will remain on sub-lease with Southern. Further reshuffling will result in Southern having a fleet of four two-carriage and 13 three-carriage sets by December 2022.[7][8][9]

In September 2022, 171202, 171401 and 171402 were transferred to East Midlands Railway and renumbered to 170422, 170423 and 170424 before being renumbered to Class 170s/9s.

175s - As has been mentioned I can see these going either to GWR to replace their HST fleet or Chiltern to replace their loco hauled fleet. However, I think that there is too many in the class 175 fleet to replace the Chiltern Loco-Hauled fleet. The problem that you have is that if the class 175's go to Chiltern, then they are likely only to be using the 16 3 car units, as two of those coupled together would be the equivalent of the 6 coaches per loco hauled unit currently being operated. They would be no need for the two car units. However, if the class 175 went to GWR they could replace most of the class 255 castle units with using 11 of the three car units, with the 11 2 car units. You could two sets of two three car class 175 units working with each other to form 6 car trains and have a three car set as spare. But some of this has been mentioned in the class 175 speculation thread.

180s - The units with EMT I know are being held on for a few years, while class 810 are being introduced. But come 2025, I suspect that these will either go to Grand Central as there is only four units and one of those units I believe is still a four car unit? But it will depend on whether Grand central within the next two years plans to replace their existing class 180 fleet with new trains and perhaps buy brand new IET trains off the shelf?

222s - I am not sure where these could possibly go to be honest, other than being used on the Grand Central London Paddington - Swansea service. Even though Cross Country have an option on them, I suspect that they will not use them as they are not compatible with either the class 220 or 221 units. With the Avanti class 221 units becoming available soon, I would suspect that they are more likely to go for those as they can work with their existing fleet with little alteration (i.e. turning the tilt mechanism off). The only possibility would be if these went to Scotrail to replace twenty six HST sets.

230 - Even though the manufacture Vivarail has gone out of business, I am not sure that this has had any effect on the maintenance part of the company that would help with maintaining the units.

319s - The only other operator of the class 319 other than Northern is West Midlands Trains (London North Western Railway), who will be replacing their class 319 trains, along with the class 350/2 units with class 730 trains within the next year. Other than scrap, the only other option for these trains is to be converted into freight units if the demand is there though.

323s - Most of the class 323 fleet with West Midland Trains will go to Northern once replaced by class 730 units.

379s - Other than being converted to Battery - Electric units, I cannot see where this fleet of 30 units can fit in other than perhaps replacing the class 387/1 units at Great Northern, so that those can go south to Southern. The only other hope, would be replacing units in Scotland with work being done to electrify routes and possibly using the battery tech on some of those routes. But there is already a thread on this subject.

769s - This has been discussed in the 769 thread, but should GWR be able to get their class 769 units to work within the next year, then I can possibly see them taking the TFW class 769 units when no longer required. The problem, I think is that other than the Gatwick/Redhill - Reading services and perhaps the Didcot - Oxford shuttles, Slough to Windsor & Eton Central, Twyford to Henley on Thames would be the only services that they would be any good on. The West Ealing to Greenford and Maidenhead to marlow would be better done with something like class 230 units.
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
5,123
Location
County Durham
To a layman 156s are budget 158s i.e. same family, end door, some tables but no aircon. Some 156 routes are interworked with 158s. There aren't enough 158s going off lease to replace all 156s anyway.
The biggest difference from an operational perspective is the dwell time. A 156 can handle station dwells much faster than a 158 with its slow opening doors can. Taking the Tees Valley as an example, a 156 can keep to time but a 158 can't.

LNERs tender was for 10 x 9 coach units. Avantis 10 x 807s of 7 coaches each would do in the short term. If DfT agrees to fund same capacity then 20 additional coaches could be ordered. I hate to say it about my former town but I am not sure Chester justifies an hourly service anymore. Neither am I sure that the Birmingham - Scotland needs the remaining 807s not allocated to Liverpool. I think they could cope with fewer units than planned but the current 13 x 805s on order + Pendolinos might be a stretch to far.

Giving LNER the current order than is due to be delivered from next year wouldn't rule out 807s for Avanti because another order could be made. However, I can't see Avanti matching or exceeding pre pandemic passenger numbers next year. It could potentially happen in the likely time for a new order i.e. 2-3 years. I am a bit skeptical.
Realistically Avanti could wait until the HS2 fleet starts being delvered, which as it'll likely be before any of HS2 actually opens they'd be able to use those for extra capacity on the WCML, ie what the 807s were supposed to do.

Its highly likely that if LNER tender comes to fruition they will get a Hitachi AT-300 variant anyway.
LNER are thought to have chosen a preferred bidder and it wasn't Hitachi...

Does anyone know the lease length of 225 fleet?
Summer 2023 expiry with optional extension until Summer 2024.
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,440
LNER 225s - The answer is yes, as DanNCL sys above there is more demand than pre - pandemic.

XC HST's - I a possibility of the Avanti Voyagers going to XC, if there is enough requirement for paired up Voyagers to continue. If the demand is not there and not predicted to be there in say the next 10 - 15 years, then I can the XC existing Voyager fleet replacing them. The other option for replacing the XC HST's is the the EMT class 222 units, which along with the EMT class 180's I would say are also at risk.

Chiltern loco hauled - I can see Chiltern either having EMT class 180's or sharing some of the class 222 fleet with another operator.

807s - I cannot see the 807's going anywhere but Avanti to replace the Voyagers doing services like Euston - Birmingham which is all under the wires, which would replace the need for running diesel trains under the wires on the WCML. Avanti only have 18 Voyagers, there is only 13 class 805 units being built and there is at least 4 services a day with two of those Voyagers coupled together on each service. Now, admittedly it, may seem like a reduction but the IET coaches are longer, so a 7 coach IET would be the same length as to two 5 car Voyagers. If you look at the Avanti services from/to Glasgow Central there is a lot of cancelled services. Many of these cancellations, I believe are with not having the stock available to run these services. So 4 or 5 of the remaining class 807 would fill that gap. You also have to bear in mind that the class 390's are going through a refurbishment program, that will likely take the next 2 years or more. With the class 805 and 807 units, it gives Avanti the ability to have a more than adequate fleet to cover for these class 390 refurbishments and hopefully provide the full service required.

155s/156s/319s - Okay, with regards to Northern 7 class 155, 56 class 156 and 12 class 319 units, I can see these possibly being replaced by either more class 195/331 units being built or possibly a hybrid class 195/331 fleet with either three or four carriages per unit similar to what Greater Anglia have with the class 755 units.

The class 156 units with EMT are being replaced by class 170 units from TFW and Southern. These class 156 units are then transferring to Northern.

171 - This is slowly becoming a micro fleet, with previous units in the fleet being converted back to be class 170 units. As per the future comment on the class 171 wiki page:
As at August 2022, Southern operated 20 sets; 12 two-carriage sets and eight four-carriage sets. In September 2022 the two Class 171/2 and two Class 171/4 sets were reformed back into their original three carriage formations, returned to Eversholt Rail Group and leased to East Midlands Railway (EMR). Three moved to EMR where they will be converted back to Class 170s while the fourth will remain on sub-lease with Southern. Further reshuffling will result in Southern having a fleet of four two-carriage and 13 three-carriage sets by December 2022.[7][8][9]

In September 2022, 171202, 171401 and 171402 were transferred to East Midlands Railway and renumbered to 170422, 170423 and 170424 before being renumbered to Class 170s/9s.

175s - As has been mentioned I can see these going either to GWR to replace their HST fleet or Chiltern to replace their loco hauled fleet. However, I think that there is too many in the class 175 fleet to replace the Chiltern Loco-Hauled fleet. The problem that you have is that if the class 175's go to Chiltern, then they are likely only to be using the 16 3 car units, as two of those coupled together would be the equivalent of the 6 coaches per loco hauled unit currently being operated. They would be no need for the two car units. However, if the class 175 went to GWR they could replace most of the class 255 castle units with using 11 of the three car units, with the 11 2 car units. You could two sets of two three car class 175 units working with each other to form 6 car trains and have a three car set as spare. But some of this has been mentioned in the class 175 speculation thread.

180s - The units with EMT I know are being held on for a few years, while class 810 are being introduced. But come 2025, I suspect that these will either go to Grand Central as there is only four units and one of those units I believe is still a four car unit? But it will depend on whether Grand central within the next two years plans to replace their existing class 180 fleet with new trains and perhaps buy brand new IET trains off the shelf?

222s - I am not sure where these could possibly go to be honest, other than being used on the Grand Central London Paddington - Swansea service. Even though Cross Country have an option on them, I suspect that they will not use them as they are not compatible with either the class 220 or 221 units. With the Avanti class 221 units becoming available soon, I would suspect that they are more likely to go for those as they can work with their existing fleet with little alteration (i.e. turning the tilt mechanism off). The only possibility would be if these went to Scotrail to replace twenty six HST sets.

230 - Even though the manufacture Vivarail has gone out of business, I am not sure that this has had any effect on the maintenance part of the company that would help with maintaining the units.

319s - The only other operator of the class 319 other than Northern is West Midlands Trains (London North Western Railway), who will be replacing their class 319 trains, along with the class 350/2 units with class 730 trains within the next year. Other than scrap, the only other option for these trains is to be converted into freight units if the demand is there though.

323s - Most of the class 323 fleet with West Midland Trains will go to Northern once replaced by class 730 units.

379s - Other than being converted to Battery - Electric units, I cannot see where this fleet of 30 units can fit in other than perhaps replacing the class 387/1 units at Great Northern, so that those can go south to Southern. The only other hope, would be replacing units in Scotland with work being done to electrify routes and possibly using the battery tech on some of those routes. But there is already a thread on this subject.

769s - This has been discussed in the 769 thread, but should GWR be able to get their class 769 units to work within the next year, then I can possibly see them taking the TFW class 769 units when no longer required. The problem, I think is that other than the Gatwick/Redhill - Reading services and perhaps the Didcot - Oxford shuttles, Slough to Windsor & Eton Central, Twyford to Henley on Thames would be the only services that they would be any good on. The West Ealing to Greenford and Maidenhead to marlow would be better done with something like class 230 units.

In current circumstances I would be surprised if rolling stock cuts were limited to Meridians, Chiltern loco hauled and 319s. I think there are going to cuts to fleet sizes at the majority of ToCs. The government wants a significant reduction in funding very quickly and controls most of the levers. GWR scaling back its intercity services (compared with 2019 levels) to enable 802s to replace Castle HSTs may well be the start.

Is the Pendolino upgrade really causing cancellations? They have 56 Pendolinos + 18 Voyagers and seem to be struggling to run more than half their services. Surely only 2, maybe 3 are being refurbished at once? I am aware that replacing 20 Voyagers with 13 x 805s would require a reduction from the pre pandemic service level but I think that may well be justified. Passenger numbers are lower and the TPE 397s had barely been introduced when the pandemic started. I think there would not be significant overcrowding if Avanti used Pendolinos to run London to Birmingham (3tph), Manchester (3tph), Liverpool (1tph) and Glasgow (1tph). London to Chester and North Wales + Birmingham to Glasgow and Edinburgh could be run on a reduced frequency using the 13 x 805s.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,789
Location
East Anglia
Replacing 807s would rationalise the fleet by replacing 225s with units that are very similar to 801s. If additional coaches were ordered they could interwork with 9 coach 801s. Its highly likely that if LNER tender comes to fruition they will get a Hitachi AT-300 variant anyway.

Sorry I don’t think I made that very clear. I was referring to the 225 fleet as the sub fleet I wouldn’t want. Yes, the 807s would fit in perfectly or the next generation of Hitachi.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
In current circumstances I would be surprised if rolling stock cuts were limited to Meridians, Chiltern loco hauled and 319s. I think there are going to cuts to fleet sizes at the majority of ToCs. The government wants a significant reduction in funding very quickly and controls most of the levers. GWR scaling back its intercity services (compared with 2019 levels) to enable 802s to replace Castle HSTs may well be the start.

Is the Pendolino upgrade really causing cancellations? They have 56 Pendolinos + 18 Voyagers and seem to be struggling to run more than half their services. Surely only 2, maybe 3 are being refurbished at once? I am aware that replacing 20 Voyagers with 13 x 805s would require a reduction from the pre pandemic service level but I think that may well be justified. Passenger numbers are lower and the TPE 397s had barely been introduced when the pandemic started. I think there would not be significant overcrowding if Avanti used Pendolinos to run London to Birmingham (3tph), Manchester (3tph), Liverpool (1tph) and Glasgow (1tph). London to Chester and North Wales + Birmingham to Glasgow and Edinburgh could be run on a reduced frequency using the 13 x 805s.
Well, when you have Class 221 Voyagers doing services to Birmingham from London Euston on what seems to be a regular occurrence lately, that suggests to me that they are struggling with getting the class 390 Pendolino's refurbished.

In your comment, you are not allowing for maintenance of any units and also the said refreshment program. You are also not allowing for any possibly surge in passengers numbers over the next 2 - 4 years, hence why I believe the class 807 units will stay put.

Sorry I don’t think I made that very clear. I was referring to the 225 fleet as the sub fleet I wouldn’t want. Yes, the 807s would fit in perfectly or the next generation of Hitachi.
From comments people have said in these forums, Hitachi is not the preferred choice when it comes to LNER getting new trains. I am going to go out on a limb by saying that I believe that it will be either CAF or Alstom building the replacement trains for the class 225 units and that the lease on the class 225 units will be extended to 2025.

I personally think that it is going to be a version of the CAF class 397, but with final assembly in Newport, South Wales. Building of these trains I believe will be started next year, once completion of the class 197 has completed.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
2,217
Location
All around the network
Well, when you have Class 221 Voyagers doing services to Birmingham from London Euston on what seems to be a regular occurrence lately, that suggests to me that they are struggling with getting the class 390 Pendolino's refurbished.

In your comment, you are not allowing for maintenance of any units and also the said refreshment program. You are also not allowing for any possibly surge in passengers numbers over the next 2 - 4 years, hence why I believe the class 807 units will stay put.


From comments people have said in these forums, Hitachi is not the preferred choice when it comes to LNER getting new trains. I am going to go out on a limb by saying that I believe that it will be either CAF or Alstom building the replacement trains for the class 225 units and that the lease on the class 225 units will be extended to 2025.

I personally think that it is going to be a version of the CAF class 397, but with final assembly in Newport, South Wales. Building of these trains I believe will be started next year, once completion of the class 197 has completed.
Avanti were using Voyagers on the Birminghams even before covid. The 10:03 and 12:03 off Euston were favourites. It was something to do with Pendolinos on Edinburgh routes every alternating hour and the newly introduced Blackpools which stretched the fleet.

The DfT does not and never has cared about increasing passenger numbers in future, they look at the passenger numbers now, today. To look ahead would mean future-proof investment but that's silly.

LNER having chosen a bidder does not mean the DfT won't pull out the carpet and say make do with 807s now that Avanti won't need.
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,360
The Bakerloo Line stock realistically has a decade at most left in them but I suspect they'll be replaced by the 2024 stock by the late 2020s or early 2030s.
As TfL have stated themselves, that depends on money. With the current schedule of the NTfL stock for the Piccadilly, I doubt they'll be replaced until the late 2020s even if TfL gets massive budget increases...
 

Thirteen

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2021
Messages
1,888
Location
London
As TfL have stated themselves, that depends on money. With the current schedule of the NTfL stock for the Piccadilly, I doubt they'll be replaced until the late 2020s even if TfL gets massive budget increases...
Late 2020s was always the earliest that the Bakerloo Line stock was going to be replaced as the Piccadilly Line is the priority. I know TfL had gloomy forecasts of late 2030s or early 2040s for stock replacement when they were trying get a long term funding last year ls but the stock is on its last legs now, it'll be considerably knackered by the 2030s.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,726
Location
Worcester
319s are not "at risk;" they are condemned. Absolutely no chance of a future once replaced by 323s and 730s at Northern and WMT respectively.
EMT class 180's I would say are also at risk.

Chiltern loco hauled - I can see Chiltern either having EMT class 180's or sharing some of the class 222 fleet with another operator.
The EMR Class 180s are now part of the long-term fleet strategy to support the 810s, of which there weren't enough ordered.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
319s are not "at risk;" they are condemned. Absolutely no chance of a future once replaced by 323s and 730s at Northern and WMT respectively.

The EMR Class 180s are now part of the long-term fleet strategy to support the 810s, of which there weren't enough ordered.
But the class 180's are only doing a supporting role for the next 2 - 3 years. After that I think you will find they will move on.
 

172007

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2021
Messages
1,132
Location
West Mids
Class 139 fleet if not on paper as "at risk" certainly with its reliability and being a micro Fleet who's builder does not exist anymore is at risk.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,254
I do wonder whether the 68+Mk5 fleet is at risk as well. The time it has taken to get them to get even half the fleet diagrammed is ridiculous and given TPE don't have the staff to run a full service, not to mention the noise complaints making them practically unusable, it does seem they would be better off with a scaled back timetable and releasing the stock to save operational costs.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
I do wonder whether the 68+Mk5 fleet is at risk as well. The time it has taken to get them to get even half the fleet diagrammed is ridiculous and given TPE don't have the staff to run a full service, not to mention the noise complaints making them practically unusable, it does seem they would be better off with a scaled back timetable and releasing the stock to save operational costs.
The latest National Rail Contract (November 2021) has their lease ending April 2023, I wouldn't be suprised if it doesn't get extended.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,051
Location
Reston City Centre
The EMR Class 180s are now part of the long-term fleet strategy to support the 810s, of which there weren't enough ordered.

But the class 180's are only doing a supporting role for the next 2 - 3 years. After that I think you will find they will move on.

I’d be surprised if the 180s hung around at EMR

1. There are enough 810s on order for roughly half the London - Nottingham/ Sheffield trains to be doubled up (back of fag packet maths, let’s say they run a half hourly Sheffield - London - Nottingham - London - Sheffield service… “slow” in one direction and “fast” in the other… that’s maybe 2h + 1h45 + 1h30 + 2h15… (*) add half an hour turnaround time at each terminus and you’re still under ten hours… so just under twenty units required to run a half hourly service… so by my maths, and allowing for maybe 90% fleet availability, thirty three units would allow around broadly half the diagrams to be doubled up

2. A 5x24m 810 has roughly the same number of standard class seats as a seven coach 222 (and the current set up is 23x5 and only 4x7 - https://eversholtrail.co.uk/fleet/class-222/ ), so I think even single 810s would cope with passenger volumes (especially as there are going to be more carriages of 810s than there are of 222s)

3. Probably most importantly: the government are in charge. Any ambitions that Abellio had to expand the fleet further is irrelevant, any franchise commitments can be ignored. If GWR are having to surrender their “legacy” High Speed trains and stretch the “modern” fleet further (800s replacing HSTs) at the same time as losing 10% of their EMUs then it seems “brave” to assume that EMR will be able to keep their “legacy” High Speed trains (180s) - these were only needed because the terrible state of the HSTs meant a speedy withdrawal and 180s were about the only thing available. If you look at the “squeeze more out of your existing fleet” approach that the Government have insisted on at Southern etc (to withdraw small fleets), it seems ‘optimistic’ to assume that our public sector overlords will allow EMR to be the one exception to the rule. Maybe they will turn a blind eye, I’d rather EMR had more trains than fewer, but that involves putting a lot of trust in HM Government, and I think I can guess which way the wind is blowing

I do wonder whether the 68+Mk5 fleet is at risk as well

Agreed; the only question is whether the coaches outlive their “sister” fleet at Caledonian Sleeper, since the long term prospects there look to be on a “shoogly peg”

(*- my reference to “2h + 1h45 + 1h30 + 2h15” being the rough times for a “fast” Sheffield to London, a “slow” London to Nottingham, a “fast” Nottingham to London and a “slow” London to Sheffield - i.e. covering each one of the four services on the Leicester corridor - though these may be slightly faster with 810s - I’m not saying that there will be inter working between the Sheffield and Nottingham services, I’m just using the theoretical example of a combined diagram to show that you’d probably only need eighteen diagrams to run a half hourly service even if you assume half an hour turnaround at each terminus)
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,254
The latest National Rail Contract (November 2021) has their lease ending April 2023, I wouldn't be suprised if it doesn't get extended.
Indeed, seems nonsense that traction training is ongoing when there aren't enough traincrew to run the scheduled service.

For every member of traincrew being trained on 68+Mk5, that is one less passenger diagram covered.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,393
I can see the 807s working well for LNER - it might be a similar case to what SWT had with the 450s - they ordered too many and some subsequently went to Silverlink/Central - or they could just order them separately. Either way I reckon they would be the most practical option for LNER, simply for the economies of scale associated with operating them alongside their other IETs.


Yes, however much I like the Chiltern loco hauled sets I can see they are on the way out. Seeing as they no longer have a classified business zone or catering I can't see why 175s or other DMUs can't do what they already do but with more flexibility likely for less money. I feel like the 175s will find a home, despite being a microfleet, with Chiltern or GWR likely being contenders.


As far as London and the SE specifically, I can see the 458s' future becoming uncertain - now they have cut funding for the refurb they will likely go off lease when (or more pessimistically, if) the 701s end up in service, unless by then they decide to restart refurbishing them like was initially planned in a few years. If GWR decide to ditch their 769s I really can't see them ending up anywhere but scrap.

350/2s could also be fit for this thread, with lots of potential uses but also a lot of doubt being cast over their future.
Re your last para ditto 379s.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
2,217
Location
All around the network
I do wonder whether the 68+Mk5 fleet is at risk as well. The time it has taken to get them to get even half the fleet diagrammed is ridiculous and given TPE don't have the staff to run a full service, not to mention the noise complaints making them practically unusable, it does seem they would be better off with a scaled back timetable and releasing the stock to save operational costs.
Noise? They aren't any louder than the majestic growl of the 185s engines.

A big reason for unreliability on UK railways compared to the continent is the lack of slack in our fleets compared to Germany and France, which run their railways with more spares so when more trains than expected are out for repair the railways can run without cancellations.
 

43074

Established Member
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Messages
2,253
1. There are enough 810s on order for roughly half the London - Nottingham/ Sheffield trains to be doubled up (back of fag packet maths, let’s say they run a half hourly Sheffield - London - Nottingham - London - Sheffield service… “slow” in one direction and “fast” in the other… that’s maybe 2h + 1h45 + 1h30 + 2h15… (*) add half an hour turnaround time at each terminus and you’re still under ten hours… so just under twenty units required to run a half hourly service… so by my maths, and allowing for maybe 90% fleet availability, thirty three units would allow around broadly half the diagrams to be doubled up
That is on the optimistic assumption that they would be used to run in pairs all day, whereas actually what's more likely is 10 or so peak services to St Pancras each way will run as 10 cars and that will be all. Even though there are plenty of contra(London) peak services which are busy and would benefit from being 10 cars.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Back to at risk fleets - EMR 360s - which solves the 360 maintenance issues and could absorb some of the spare capacity in the Thameslink Class 700 fleet :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top