Sometimes I think this whole recruitment process and criteria is ridiculous.
"Think of a time you do a role similar to that of a train driver. (But not what you wrote down) And it would help if it was driving something several hundred metres long and full of passengers!"
For a decent chunk of people, this would be a career change. So its unlikely you've ever done anything explicitly similar. I think there are skills they can look for, methodical, able to follow rules, can multi task, a technical background etc.
Of the 3 drivers I personally know who retrained, (Arriva, SouthEastern and Avanti) 2 were in very similar roles to myself. And the other is the same industry but a sales role. A friends Dad also went from running a motorcycle dealer to ultimately Eurostar!
But having an incredibly rigid criteria MUST exclude candidates who could be excellent drivers. Simply because they dont have specific experience.
I found it interesting that they admit they have a shortage of drivers in general, yet from peoples comments on here and elsewhere reject 90%+ of people that even get to the DMI/MMI stages. Which suggests that they should re-order the process and do DMI/MMI first and THEN to the assessments. A huge rejection rate during, not before, the process perhaps indicates that it needs overhauling. If only to stop them wasting so much time interviewing hundreds of people for maybe a handful of positions (I was never told how many vacancies there actually were)
I did chuckle to myself that the training costs £100k per driver, for 2 reasons.
1) If you cant take a suitable person with no train experience and make them into a driver with £100k in 12-15months then the training isn't very good if you need a candidate to be starting from a very similar role.
And 2) If you want to learn to fly commercial aircraft (eg Airbus A320 for EasyJet) The 18-24 month training from ZERO experience flying to full ATPL (Airline Transport Pilot Licence) is roughly £100-£120K (albeit self funded by the candidate)