Cardiff123
Established Member
There's an article on the BBC website quoting experts defending Arriva today, basically saying that they've done exactly as they were told for 15 years, fulfilling all of their contract obligations and the fault of ATW's franchise is with the Westminster government who awarded the franchise in 2003. Which of course is true.It seems to be very appropriate for ATW to shout 'Do Not Travel' as their franchise finally comes to an end. Some people must have htought that this has been their message to passengers all along!
Hopefully 'no growth' franchises are a thing of the past, but what on earth was the UK govt thinking in 2003, awarding a standstill franchise, locked in for 15 years?
If a standstill franchise had to be awarded due to the crisis in Network Rail taking over from Railtrack at the time etc, it should've been a 5 year short franchise max. Or a 10 year franchise absolute maximum with a 5 year halfway break clause. Because as we know, by 2008 it was more than obvious that the franchise was already failing.
It would've been known in 2003 that Pacers weren't built to last another 15 years. It was known that letting a standstill franchise that close to the PRM 2020 deadline would cause major problems, as we are now seeing.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-45838051
Tony Miles, from Modern Railways magazine, said Arriva was left hamstrung for some of the problems.
"The contract for Arriva Trains Wales was let by the Westminster Labour government in 2003," he said.
"When it was let at that point, it was assumed - as it was across the rest of the UK - that there wouldn't be much growth on the railways.
"People need to bear in mind when complaining about not enough seats that if you want to get more trains you have to get permission from the government to order them and permission to then use them.
"It's not Arriva's fault. They are only allowed to do what they're allowed to do."
He said the new franchise would be different as control solely rests with the Welsh Government.
Stuart Cole, professor of transport at the University of South Wales, said he was surprised Arriva managed to keep the network running with some trains that were 40 years old.
"Arriva was required to run the railway as it was," he said.
"They took over a franchise that wasn't fit for purpose. It was an old and tired railway they ran to their credit."
He added: "The reason why £5bn is going to be spent over the next 15 years is because it wasn't spent over the last 15 years.
"It's a catch-up on what we should've had a long time ago."
Arriva Trains Wales managing director Tom Joyner said more than £100m had been invested over the last 15 years.
He added: "We can rightly feel proud to be handing over the franchise in a far better condition that the one we inherited in 2003."
