• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Arriva Midlands

bringiton

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2024
Messages
645
Location
derby
2928 - CK58 FZK (cotswold stone Pulsar) seems to be have entered service, currently on the 21
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,376
Location
Lichfield
x38 being a route change. Ditching Derby bus station to go back to Victoria street?

Constant timetable and routing changes aren't really in the customers best interest, but they, that has never bothered Arriva in the past.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

2928 - CK58 FZK (cotswold stone Pulsar) seems to be have entered service, currently on the 21

Can't be much left in Cotswold Stone livery now which is a shame considering it's better than the current livery.
 

Foxhound87

Member
Joined
25 Jul 2024
Messages
24
Location
Earth
Constant timetable and routing changes aren't really in the customers best interest, but they, that has never bothered Arriva in the past.

What are the X38 route and timetable changes? I didn’t think this had changed since August 2024, hardly constant changes.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,376
Location
Lichfield
What are the X38 route and timetable changes? I didn’t think this had changed since August 2024, hardly constant changes.

Post #958 mentions changes to the X38, amongst others, I don't know what the changes consist of.

I wasn't referring to the X38 specifically, more Arrivas fondness for tinkering with routes and timetables while their empire falls apart around them.
 

joieman

Member
Joined
18 Feb 2024
Messages
960
Location
Loughborough
Post #958 mentions changes to the X38, amongst others, I don't know what the changes consist of.

I wasn't referring to the X38 specifically, more Arrivas fondness for tinkering with routes and timetables while their empire falls apart around them.
Well, if anything, the 127 certainly needs its timetable fixing. Spending nearly ten minutes dawdling about at Fennel Street or Lemyngton Street is no fun for through passengers.

In fact, perhaps they should run an express route to Shepshed avoiding the villages and maybe even curtail the 127 to run between *Leicester* and Loughborough. The 127 as it is now is a relic of the time before the Mountsorrel Bypass was built.
 
Last edited:

SSmith2009

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2021
Messages
573
Location
East Midlands
Well, if anything, the 127 certainly needs its timetable fixing. Spending nearly ten minutes dawdling about at Fennel Street or Lemyngton Street is no fun for through passengers.

In fact, perhaps they should run an express route to Shepshed avoiding the villages and maybe even curtail the 127 to run between Shepshed and Loughborough. The 127 as it is now is a relic of the time before the Mountsorrel Bypass was built.
Agree with you on the 127 it's a shadow of its former self, no wonder Skylink takes most of the Leicester to Loughborough traffic nowadays, If anything the 127 needs to go back to how it used to be with some terminating at Pitsford Drive

They've done the same with the 50/51 padded in too much layover time into the timetables and they can be waiting on Narborough Road at Jaguar Garage and Gaul Street for anywhere upto 10 mins.
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
3,678
I would have thought the X38 did reasonably well from/to the bus station.
They do get a few passengers from what I have seen but only really in the single figures. Most still seem to head to Victoria Street.
 

Qwerty133

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2012
Messages
2,619
Location
Leicester/Sheffield
Agree with you on the 127 it's a shadow of its former self, no wonder Skylink takes most of the Leicester to Loughborough traffic nowadays, If anything the 127 needs to go back to how it used to be with some terminating at Pitsford Drive

They've done the same with the 50/51 padded in too much layover time into the timetables and they can be waiting on Narborough Road at Jaguar Garage and Gaul Street for anywhere upto 10 mins.
Some of the elderly diesels that were being used on the 50/51 prior to the introduction of the electrics were struggling to keep up with the current timings. The transport commissioner should also take some blame for extreme padding given operators can be fined for late running but there is no punishment for excessive timings. In an ideal world there would either be more leeway to run early at the city end of routes or for late running to be ignored at all timing points other than the terminus (with all recovery time en route being put into the last few stops after the last timing point).
 

derbybusdepot

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2015
Messages
346
They do get a few passengers from what I have seen but only really in the single figures. Most still seem to head to Victoria Street.
I would hazard a guess Trent pick up more since they started waiting time at Victoria street. That is the long established starting point, and with both arriva and Trent going via that stop it is the obvious place to head to, especially if getting a £3 single and it does not matter who is operating the bus.
 

Dwarfer1979

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2025
Messages
437
Location
Leicester
Well, if anything, the 127 certainly needs its timetable fixing. Spending nearly ten minutes dawdling about at Fennel Street or Lemyngton Street is no fun for through passengers.

In fact, perhaps they should run an express route to Shepshed avoiding the villages and maybe even curtail the 127 to run between Shepshed and Loughborough. The 127 as it is now is a relic of the time before the Mountsorrel Bypass was built.
The 127 is still the only bus for Rothley & Mountsorrell and the main bus for Quorn to both Leicester & Loughborough (& a big link from Birstall to Leicester from the main road as the Skylink is limited stop and only serves a single stop on that section of route, I think still) and those are major flows so the Loughborough to Leicester section is still important. It has long been the case that most Leicester to Loughborough passengers use the Skylink unless, like me, they have a pass for travel on the Arriva that doesn't include the Skylink so that hasn't changed.

The 127 is one of those routes that comprises of two core flows either side of town but with a certain amount of traffic crossing between the two halves (particularly but not exclusively education flows) that mean that joining them up has a commercial advantage.

Timetable design is a complicated thing with modern traffic and sometimes you do just need to add some recovery time during the trip to deal with the unpredictability of traffic besides which, even leaving aside the legal matter of the TCs guidance and expectation on reliability which these days is often monitored via tracking data so much more extensive than the old roadside checks, you get far more complaints about unreliability and late running than buses running to time and having to wait time occasionally. It would probably help Arriva somewhat if they clearly showed that recovery time with arrival & departure times in Loughborough town centre rather than hiding it in the running time and confusing passengers.
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
5,090
Location
Great Britain
It would probably help Arriva somewhat if they clearly showed that recovery time with arrival & departure times in Loughborough town centre rather than hiding it in the running time and confusing passengers.
Not specifically Arriva Midlands but what is the thoughts on this practice? Does the TC enforce against this if buses end up late arriving or would they just look at the departure time and appreciate this is padding in the timetable? I ask because I know a firm who has gotten rid of arrival/departure times but has kept the same departure times from the relevant stop, so now it just looks like an extremely slow bus journeys but in reality the bus tends to arrive 5-10 minutes early regularly (which were the original arrival times before they got removed).
 

joieman

Member
Joined
18 Feb 2024
Messages
960
Location
Loughborough
Well, the 127 is included in the next round of bus service changes, so we shall have to see what that entails.

According to Bustimes, Arriva Merseyside's Mercedes-Benz Sprinter/Mellor Stratas 4701 and 4702 have been transferred to Thurmaston.
 
Last edited:

Stan Drews

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2013
Messages
2,139
Not specifically Arriva Midlands but what is the thoughts on this practice? Does the TC enforce against this if buses end up late arriving or would they just look at the departure time and appreciate this is padding in the timetable? I ask because I know a firm who has gotten rid of arrival/departure times but has kept the same departure times from the relevant stop, so now it just looks like an extremely slow bus journeys but in reality the bus tends to arrive 5-10 minutes early regularly (which were the original arrival times before they got removed).
Only the departure times from timing points are measured, so whether a separate arrival time and layover is shown in a timetable or not, won’t impact the punctuality figure.
 

SSmith2009

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2021
Messages
573
Location
East Midlands
Well, the 127is included in the next round of bus service changes, so we shall have to see what that entails.

According to Bustimes, Arriva Merseyside's Mercedes-Benz Sprinter/Mellor Stratas 4701 and 4702 have been transferred to Thurmaston.
Interesting moves wonder what they'll be used on.
 

derbybusdepot

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2015
Messages
346
Is there one more 58 plate E400 in Derby that isn't on bustimes?
Heard 3 got transferred but bustimes only lists 2.
4421 (FHG) is in use at Derby, 4421. Freshly painted. Has been tracking as 3747. A number of buses also tracking with spare ticket machine, namely three vdls carrying old Merseyside numbers and not yet received new midlands ids.
 

ferry58

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2024
Messages
20
Location
Stafford
3747 at Telford (the ex-Derby Pulsar) also appears to be tracking as 4416 (the ex-Telford E-400). See Bustimes tracking for 3747 on 25/7 & a few days before that.
 

zkyx02

Member
Joined
26 Nov 2024
Messages
211
Location
Derby, Derbyshire
So it seems after a year of competition on X38 Arriva are calling it quits.

With the new service changes X38 is now to run every 30 mins, with no Sunday service & is to interwork with the 20/21 services.

The 4 is also to see a frequency slash to every 30 mins & 4s will now also be interworked with the 26s…

I’m unable to share the post as it’s only been shared on blink, but I can’t see it being long before Arriva share the news
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
3,678
So it seems after a year of competition on X38 Arriva are calling it quits.

With the new service changes X38 is now to run every 30 mins, with no Sunday service & is to interwork with the 20/21 services.

The 4 is also to see a frequency slash to every 30 mins & 4s will now also be interworked with the 26s…

I’m unable to share the post as it’s only been shared on blink, but I can’t see it being long before Arriva share the news
Not surprised with the x38, but I can't see it lasting long at every 30 mins when trent are every 15 mins.
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
3,678
I can't see the Trentbarton service staying every 15 minutes either.
Back in the day it was every 15 but on a hourly round trip with 4 buses before the previous 20 min frequency on a 80 min round trip to make the service reliable.
 

Trainman40083

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
4,523
Location
Derby
Back in the day it was every 15 but on a hourly round trip with 4 buses before the previous 20 min frequency on a 80 min round trip to make the service reliable.
Yes, but back in the day, certain tickets were valid on both buses.
 

Top