The deployment of FV107s CVR(T)s (Scimitar light tanks to the Sun and Daily Mirror readers) had nothing to do with intimidating the public in to an invasion of Iraq. It was done by a government that needed to be seen to be doing something in the wake of the Septemeber 11th attacks, nearly 2 years before we set foot on Iraqi soil.
I flew to New York in February 2003, just before Valentine's Day, and there were soldiers standing on the roof of the runway underpass, and as you might remember - there were the protest marches that Tony totally ignored. Wasn't it supposed to be about a million people in total, discounted on the basis that a million was still a small percentage of the population as a whole.
I was also in NYC for their own anti-war protests, which I'm not sure the local networks gave much or any coverage to (Fox certainly didn't). We didn't know they were going to be going on, and got caught up in it (and I took loads of photos) but it showed that an awful lot of people didn't see any connection with 9/11 and Iraq or want to go to war - even though we all know the troops were already on their way before the decision was officially made. Indeed, it had been 9/11 and a link to Afghanistan initially. I have to confess I can't remember how or why Iraq suddenly came into it.
I do also recall the supposed threat of terrorists bringing down planes with heat seeking missiles, which was also quite conveniently mentioned around the same time, but wondered even then how or why the threat suddenly went away, especially after the army left Heathrow (not to be confused with armed police within the airport). Surely there's as big a threat now as there was then (oh, wait, that's probably the point!).
Last edited: